Say you. Granted we don't know each other, what we do, have done or know, but this is what I see and based on that and what I do know to be fact, I'm convinced what I described is what's going on. The old detective's saying "Follow the money!" could not be truer.
I'm older. My life's run it's course. It was and still is, very full. So, I don't give a single fuck whether you or anyone else chooses to take me seriously or not. I just know that evil does exist for it's own sake and the old names that still control the world's money are evil. They don't give 2 shits about anything or anyone but themselves. I know a few of these people, their minions and orgs personally - some very well - having run into them in the course of my career. We mean absolutely nothing more to them than the tokenized objects they want to turn us into. I also know the political system here well enough to know it's not on the level. There's only the appearance of a competitive 2-party system. We have selections in these United States, not elections. The same people that set up and run the systems here do so throughout the Western world.
So, dismiss my opinions - or not. It makes no difference to me.
It concerns all of us living in the West because the effort to dismantle Western civilization as we've thought we've known it isn't limited to the UK or Australia or New Zealand or Canada, but includes the West in it's entirety. The same people behind the immigration replacement effort in Europe are involved in the illegal migration effort to accomplish the same goals in the US. This is a global banking controlled, techno-corporate oligarchy effort that seeks to transform Western society into an autocratic technocracy. They seek to control every aspect of our lives by digitizing/tokenizing everything so controllable value can be placed on it all including water. They seek control of the food chain by claiming the threat of climate change and that cows are a major cause of that threat. The Dutch, once known as the world's most knowledgeable farmers, are now targeted to be regulated out of business. They're no longer allowed to teach sustainable farming practices in UN programs because the WEF oligarchy want to replace family farming with just a few major conglomerate farming concerns and replace beef and proteins with infinitely controllable 3D-printed meat/fish products that can introduce whatever they desire into our food chain and into our bodies. They use the structures of the EU and the UN through the WEF to leverage government officials like Starmer or Mertz, Macron, and even people in the US like Texas Governor Greg Abbott to achieve their goals. It's a bit more of an uphill slog for them in the US because so many people here are armed and that's a potential problem for them but they're working on that as well. This concerns us all and your continued focus and attempts to paint those that disagree as hypocritical and or illogical w/o addressing the actual issues they're speaking on means yours is an effort in support of that technocratic oligarchy to discredit our doubts, doubts which are borne from what they're try to do which is becoming ever increasingly obvious.
@New12Robert@ExxAlerts It's NEVER the dog, but ALWAYS the owner. Pits, Staffordshire Terriers, Rottweilers, etc, are just dogs. They're like computers and bad AI: garbage in = garbage out. They are what they're made to be.
@brettrigby7@_InThisTogether I guess you're better at using X than I am. Good for you. Sometimes I need more room to express myself and I hate ads. Whatever your opinion of me is doesn't change what Starmer, his ilk and this rule is about or my thoughts on it.
Yes, while I'm still able and so that others might see this for the authoritarian thing it is. That is my right. And yes, the system is fucked. So, move on and try shilling for this monstrosity and globalist puppet Starmer elsewhere please. I'm not accepting it or it's premise, believe that most don't and believe I've made my point. If you don't agree, then don't. That's your right.
In general, technology - not just phones - is for all intents and purposes, indispensable now for conducting life in this society. It's become almost impossible to do anything w/o it. I pay for the blue tick so I can more fully express my thoughts. Yes, that sucks, but that doesn't mean I approve of it or of being tracked and watched or being forced to accept the govt openly having access to all. If the govt does it surreptitiously as it does already, it can be argued against. That's not true if you accept their doing so openly.
We intuitively know it, but we're forced to use phones despite that knowledge. That's not tacit approval. The alternative is not to use mobile phones. Proving it and getting it undone is very difficult. That's very different from accepting a govt dictate attempting to formalize and make it legal.
@BreannaMorello What're the Chinese doing with all the properties they're purchasing and building on especially if they're not producing the jobs they promised? Why's the US so accommodating to it's greatest threat? Are we back to the Chinese Spy balloon days? Did we ever leave?
π¨ OPINION π¨
Chinese companies are pouring into the United States, dangling promises of thousands of new jobs that they rarely β if ever β actually deliver.
Why do they do it?
It provides politicians with convenient political cover to roll out the red carpet and let them in.
Once the companies are here and the land is purchased, the uncreated jobs become irrelevant.
They forfeit tax credits they never truly needed, but more importantly, the community is left with little recourse to remove them β because the property is already theirs.ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
As Americans, we must call it out.
Share my report below please!
EVERY phone's not just, tracked, but listened to and recorded w/o the user's consent and it started long before the blue tick, which BTW, can still be obfiscated. The difference is we all know it, can choose to - or not to - consent to without the false pretence that it's for anyone's safety. There are plenty of parental controls on all platforms all parents can, should and most use.
The difference is freedom of choice.