@MukeshPathakji Vote should be divisible like property downstream the generations....ONLY that will take care of this and almost all other issues of society....
@ANI There is nothing more satisfying than something logical thought by someone, being independently getting created by another.
Really would be a revolution if the quality isn't compromised..
Hell, may be MODI ACT ki jururat hi khatm ho jaye...
At last some one listened.
Had asked one SC guy here playing victim card, questioning why all Sweet Shops are "Agrawal" "Gupta" etc.
The idiot didn't listen. But someone did.
May the shop make the best sweets and start a trend. No sane guy will see the board and Not Buy.
But MODI ACT will say, chosit hai...but also want the group to remain Chosit...Vanchit...Peedeet...
@FredipusRex@elonmusk My bad...
But you know what, there is a theory that eventually what will differentiate AI from humanity is going to be, the ability to make mistakes...and change spellings to evolv languge
....pun intended.
@phoenix47rising@elonmusk There is a possibility, if it becomes self aware ( through loop algos and self improvement).
It has, apparently ( not expert here ) already improvising.
Bang on target.
Problem is only one: the menace is multi headed, some heads so sweet, you just fall in love.
What IS the solution? Problem is identified.
IMHO, the non-editable book of SOP needs edition change, but it's cleverly put up as the last ever edition, to even think any deletion or addition itself is punishable by elimination.
There is NO SHAME for the other,
Sooner than later, he will be bestowed title of "Shahid" and a Mazar built, prayers offered, lectures delivered of the bravery.
And it's inevitable, as the SOP remains unchanged.
It has already begun with doubts being expressed at the whole event by the silent "non-radicalised" ones.....
Rather let there be one Non-Cult pilot at least with all CULT pilots..
If all on a flight are CULT, at least passengers be given a choice,
Upar Jake Neeche Aana Chahte hai? Ya seedha upar...
Jokes apart, the few places where the cult presence is risky most are:
1. Pilot
2. Bus drivers
3. Doctors
4. Food outlets...
Please add on
And Be careful, with getting exposed day by day, the few radical enough will hit again out of frustration.
And the non radicals will give coverfire.
100 percentage agenda of the so called incestual intellectual of left wing cabal.
They come, they shyte, spread and move.
No sane Indian or even so called RW will defend such 'demands' ( which were thankfully not made by BAPS anyways ).
A request can be made by anyone about anything, however. And the onus lies of the granter, if it is deemed not as per the policy of their own.
During the whole issue, neither BAPS, ties with Modi NOR being Indian is the issue that needed to be blamed and flamed.
That being done is agenda and dishonesty of the so called liberal intellectuals. Well, nobody gives two hoots to such idiots now.
Sure, BAPS can be critiqued for its own views about women and it's not representative of 1/1000th of the RW - if you call it, it is totally intellectual dishonesty to put them in the dock for the Eiffel Tower controversy - whether it was then or now.
Don't have the delusion of intellectual or moral superiority over any RW or India or hell even BAPS..Go deal with those who allowed/misread what was requested.
@MediaHarshVT
While what Smit did is "Dharma", ye cult walo ki "praise" etc par jyada feel proud na kare
Till they have to defend and sustain the wealth of oil, they will accomodate almost anything. Truely free of bigotry and delusion of superiority hote to "appreciation" " praise" jaise words ( symbolic of delusion of grandeur) ki jagah " thankful" "proud that humanity is in safe hands" use karte....
BTW, someone of them only hired the "true to his ideology copilot"....so support base hai....but "all in whatever capacity should do what must be done" - even if it means praising.....
No sane Indian or even so called RW will defend such demands ( which were thankfully not made by BAPS anyways ).
A request can be made by anyone about anything, however. And the onus lies of the granter, if it is deemed not as per the policy of their own.
During the whole issue, neither BAPS, ties with Modi nor being Indian is the issue to be blamed. That being done is agenda.
Sure, BAPS can be critiqued for its own views about women and it's not representative of 1/1000th of the RW - if you call it, it is totally intellectual dishonesty to put them in the dock for the Eiffel Tower controversy - whether it was then or now.
Don't have the delusion of intellectual or moral superiority over any RW or India or hell even BAPS..Go deal with those who allowed/misread what was requested.