Rupert Lowe follows £14.5 billion through one housing deal - STAGGERING!
In Parliament on 10 September 2026, Restore Britain’s leader has forced officials to explain how Britain sold about 55,000 military family homes for £1.7 billion, rented them back and ended up an estimated £14.5 billion worse off.
The chain starts in 1996. The Ministry of Defence sells the homes to Annington, then leases them back for 200 years while remaining responsible for maintenance and management.
These are not spare offices or forgotten warehouses. They are homes for servicemen and women whose families regularly face deployments, separation, school changes and moves across the country.
The deal means the taxpayer pays rent on homes it once owns. If the MoD improves a property, the work can increase an asset belonging to somebody else.
By 2024, the annual rent bill reaches £230 million.
The Government eventually buys back more than 36,000 homes for £6 billion. Officials say the repurchase is a success: it secures properties valued on Annington’s balance sheet at £10.1 billion and is expected to save the MoD £7.7 billion over ten years.
Rupert Lowe gives credit for that clean-up. But he refuses to let a successful rescue erase the scale of the original mistake.
The National Audit Office’s £14.5 billion figure is not simply the purchase price or a single missing payment. It is the amount by which the MoD is estimated to be worse off by 2024 than if it had never entered the sale-and-leaseback deal.
That is Restore Britain’s case for following public money all the way to the end (even when the trail begins three decades earlier). A government cannot call the clean-up a triumph and quietly close the book on how the damage happened.
Lowe has run contracting businesses. He tells the committee that when a contract looks this bad, he questions whether fraud or misfeasance may have occurred. He asks whether the MoD has a process to “lift the drains” when the taxpayer has been comprehensively beaten in a deal.
That is a question, not a finding of fraud.
The permanent secretary confirms that the 1996 agreement has been a poor deal, says it has undergone repeated National Audit Office scrutiny, and declines to comment further on the possibility Lowe raises.
The homes are back. The estimated £14.5 billion loss is not.
And Rupert Lowe’s final question-whether a deal this damaging triggers a deeper investigation-has received no substantive answer.
@voag@BogeParker@EPLBible Yep , not in terms of league positions, but in the fact of sky and Premier leagues obvious bias, and clear favourable decisions towards certain teams!!! They want those teams to succeed.
Top six so called elite fans , keep saying #AVFV need to build a new stadium and grow economically.
We don't have the benefit of being in London ( thank fuck) but economically beneficial.
Cheating Chelsea ( who's stadium capacity is 40000, and don't have a shirt sponsor)
Am I the only person in this whole feminist feckin
rainbow merging
Epstine hiding
Ufo blinding
Pizza box eating
Council milking
Government lying
And still couldn't give a fuck if the eath is flat or round!!!!
The real twats are alot closer to home , and fuck you every day !!