We're using AI but not seeing business impact.
Because coding is an input, and AI made inputs free. So "we shipped a lot" now means nothing.
Two scoreboards that matter:
- Did it move the top line? (the customer)
- Did it move the bottom line? (us)
Move neither = kill it.
The real asset isn't chess — it's that he's glued to it.
What transfers is knowing how curiosity feels from the inside, so he can chase that feeling anywhere: music, dancing, cricket, studying, work.
Chess is just the vehicle the passion showed up in.
@deliumtech#engineering
My son Arav is glued to chess — so I'm using it to teach him everything I think matters: money, character, judgment, passion.
Then we found Zah: a bot from an inverted universe. It refuses to win. To beat it, you have to lose — by forcing it to win. Same rules. Goal flipped.
What I want Arav to keep and the moral if the story for me:
1. How would I lose? is often easier than How do I win?
2. You don't really understand a system until you can run it in reverse.
3. The rules are fixed. What you optimize for is a choice - and it changes everything.
Sync · Trust · Share · Ship · Guard · Shape.
In an engineer's hands, AI is a Ferrari whose brakes he designs. In a vibe-coder's, brakes aren't a concept he's met.
The brakes are what let you STRIDE.
@deliumtech
When the coder gets 100× faster, you don't drop best practice. You double down.
AI made coding cheap. It did not make design and judgement cheap — and it quietly 100×'d the price of not having them.
Our six engineering harnesses spell one word: STRIDE.