Keir Starmer Boasts About Giving Away 10 Million Free Breakfasts
“We’ve just hit another really important milestone. 10 million free breakfasts at our free breakfast clubs. And that’s bringing families and children together across the country.”
They’re not free though, are they? They’re paid for by hard-working taxpayers.
While families struggle with high taxes, energy bills, and the cost of living, Keir Starmer is celebrating 10 million free school breakfasts, that’s likely £20–30 million and rising, taken straight from our pockets.
Why exactly should people grinding away at work every day be forced to subsidise breakfast for kids who aren’t theirs?
Parents have a responsibility to feed their own children.
This isn’t “investing in the next generation” it’s expanding the welfare state and normalising the idea that the government (i.e. you and me) should pick up the tab for basic parenting.
If we keep going down this road, what’s next? Free dinners, free holidays, free everything? Enough. Taxpayers aren’t bottomless ATMs.
Ask yourself: what kind of force drafts an official statement three days after a teenager’s death that effectively paints him as the aggressor — and only rows back when the family’s fury makes it politically impossible?
What kind of chief constable signs off a culture where the priority, in the immediate aftermath of a fatal stabbing, is not “how did we fail him?” but “how do we protect ourselves?”
The IOPC has already confirmed it is investigating the officers’ contact with Henry, including the use of handcuffs and first aid, yet Hampshire briefed The Telegraph that there is “no indication of misconduct” and that all officers are merely “witnesses”.
This looks less like accountability and more like an early attempt to lock in a “nothing to see here” narrative before the watchdog has even finished.
When a chief constable presides over a force that handcuffs a dying boy, drafts victim‑blaming lines, meddles in a live trial, and then rushes out exonerating briefings for his own officers, the problem is not rogue PCs — it’s the man at the top.
The Sunday Times reports that 3 days after Henry Nowak’s death, police wanted to issue a statement implying Henry was the aggressor.
By then, they already had evidence that wasn’t the case. Only after objections from Henry’s family was the wording changed.
They weren’t trying to protect Henry. They were trying to protect themselves. That was the disinformation 💣
The rotten establishment despises the fact that Restore Britain is supported by millions of patriotic British men and women.
I have one response to traitors like Alastair Campbell.
GET USED TO IT.
I've been called out by @TahirAliMP in Parliament because I criticised his eager lobbying for the construction of an airport in Mirpur, Pakistan.
Let me repeat myself - I do not care about Pakistani airports.
British MPs should prioritise Britain over Pakistan.
EVERY TIME.
This is not a debate.
Words have meanings. The Marxists keep trying to subvert our culture by undermining our language.
English is an ethnicity with a language and a culture in a particular place.
The English are a people.
England is of and for the English.
It is right and proper that @RestoreBritain stands in the Makerfield by election. It is a political party and it exists to fight elections.
It will not make a blind bit of difference who from the Labour Party leads that party. They are all awful.
If Restore can poll well in Makerfield it will overnight become a threat to Reform and the Tories. In that event those parties have a choice. Up their game to see off the threat from Restore or risk being wiped out.
That pressure is good for politics and good for the country.
@RupertLowe10 has invited me to campaign with him and Rebecca Shepherd in Makerfield on 13 June. I am delighted to accept that invitation.
I hope to see lots of Restore and Advance members on that day.
Let’s get up to Makerfield and win this for the country!
There is no negotiating with dictators.
Sir Keir thinks anyone who disagrees with him is causing division.
The division is there - people are only pointing it out. His tyrannous instinct tells him to silence the people highlighting it, rather than address the issues themselves.
I am a member of the Public Accounts Committee in Parliament and we have just released our findings on Britain’s broken asylum system. It is beyond damning.
Some extracts from our report…
“…Government departments still do not have a grip on how they will manage asylum as an end-to-end system, or a clear sense of what they are trying to achieve.”
“Major policy risks and operational changes have been pursued without a realistic grip on delivery risks, costs or system-wide impacts.”
“…no single point of accountability for outcomes or a governance structure for the end-to-end system.”
“…absence of a clear strategy, decisions around planning and resource allocation have been reactive and disjointed.”
“The Home Office was unable to show… that it has the commercial capabilities needed to manage asylum accommodation effectively.”
“…weaknesses in its ability to prevent excess profits accruing for contractors…”
“…no evidence that lessons from past mistakes are being used to clearly inform current actions.”
“Poor data quality and weak management information continue to prevent effective management…”
“…current data sharing limitations make it impossible to directly track individual cases through the entire asylum process.”
“The Home Office does not yet have a credible long-term strategy for asylum accommodation…”
“… there is little evidence the Home Office fully understands the impact of its approach on local services.”
“The government is at considerable risk of repeating past failures.”
But don’t worry, the government says it has a plan...
It says it has “learned a lot of lessons”.
And that it’s going to put 10,000 civil servants into what they call an “Asylum Group”.
Funded by us, of course.
How about improving data-linking systems?
The Ministry of Justice says it simply needs more of our money.
And what about ending the use of hotels and transferring to larger, “purpose-driven” sites?
“The Home Office’s own analysis suggests that large sites will cost more than hotels, as seen in previously costly attempts such as Wethersfield.”
The numbers…
£4.9 billion spent on the system each year, including:
£2.7 billion on asylum accommodation
£700 million on cash support
£600 million on unaccompanied asylum-seeking children
Nearly £1 billion on casework, appeals, detention, and removal
All spent to produce between 50,000 or so refugees each year.
And of course, these costs don’t include what is then paid by us, the taxpayer, in Local Authority housing, welfare, childcare assistance, and advice and translation services once once they receive their refugee status and are no longer in the asylum system.
Want more?
At the time of the NAO report (December 2025), Home Office reported there were roughly 224,000 individuals still waiting in the system, excluding those awaiting an initial asylum decision.
Further, since April 2024, MoJ say the number of asylum seekers waiting for an appeal decision alone has trebled, from 27,000 to 70,000, with appeals taking nearly 60 weeks to be heard.
Who pays for them while they wait over a year for a decision?
Us.
And the tens of thousands of failed asylum seekers each year - what happens to them?
The Home Office isn’t sure.
It says it knows “where some of them are”, but the rest are “elsewhere in the country”, and that it is possible they “remain in the UK without detection”.
Don’t fear though, because the Home Office won’t guarantee that it will find them, only that it would “seek to find them”. Whatever the hell that means…
And to deal with the backlog of cases and appeals?
“Home Office relaxed its recruitment arrangements, resulting in newly recruited staff being ill-suited to making complex decisions on asylum cases, which in turn affected decision quality.”
The result?
“In a rolling twelve months to May 2025, 42% of sampled decisions had significant or fail errors.”
Astounding incompetence.
But there’s more good news...
The MoJ is recruiting even more over-paid salaried and fee-paid judges, as well as recruiting judges from other chambers to sit in asylum cases.
In other words, MoJ’s response is to spend more of our money and remove judges from other work.
This is because more asylum seekers “are now representing themselves and that this requires additional support from tribunal staff.”
“The system of monitoring failed asylum seekers needs a complete overhaul,” says the report.
I have a better idea. My own view?
Scrap the entire system altogether, and deport every single illegal migrant living in Britain.
And to those of you say that it’s impossible - to any MPs, public servants, or commentators who think I’m cherry-picking information, I implore you to read every word of the PAC report, every word of the NAO report, and to watch every minute of the 2.5 hour PAC meeting from earlier this year…
And then tell me that the system is working, and that’s it’s delivering value for money, and that it’s sustainable.
It isn’t. And it never will be.
It is an intentional, monumental catastrophe designed to cripple the nation economically, socially, and culturally.
A Restore Britain government will crush the entire asylum system as its first duty to the British people.
Deport them all.
Henry Nowak died the same way a civilization dies: abandoned, handcuffed by authorities who neither trusted nor cared for him, and accused of hate crimes he did not commit. His murder is as tragic as it is enraging. He should still be alive today, and he would be if the last few generations of European elites had stood their ground against the politics of self-hatred and the mass invasion of migrants, many of whom despise the West and the people who love it.
Henry was far from the first to so needlessly lose his life, and I fear he won’t be the last. Each time a life like his is lost, the proper response—the only response—is righteous anger. One of the most important things the Trump administration has proven to the world is that stopping the flow of mass migration and defending national sovereignty is a matter of political will and leadership. Anything else is an excuse.
It is because we love the West that we want to preserve it. We love our civilization. We love our country. We love our children. And nobody—nobody—should ever die the way that Henry Nowak died. May God comfort those who loved him, and may God rest his soul.
We should rage against Henry’s killer, the police, but also these legacy media trolls.
“The police didn’t turn up at the scene of this crime and automatically presume that the brown people were the criminals and the liars and the white person was the innocent victim.”
Right. The police turned up at the scene of the crime and automatically presumed the brown person was innocent and the white person was guilty. Henry bled out because of their DEI training.
Call it politically correct or woke, whatever, but Henry died because the police subscribe to it, and James is here reinforcing it. Shame on them and shame on him! He should be hounded off air for this.
Our greatest ally, is still our greatest ally… they don’t care about the politics, they care about the people….
Which is more than our Government does, you know that right? 🔥
NEW: Sun reporting Downing Street and Foreign Office have contacted the Trump admin for “clarification” on US comments about UK civilisational decline and two tier policing.
What needs clarifying, exactly? Everyone but the Labour government can see it.
We must have the courage to call out the brutal sexism within Islam - it is simply not compatible with the British way of life.
There is finally a political party willing to do exactly that.
Restore Britain.