The "design engineer" archetype in intelligence era needs be someone much further-reaching on both ends.
Beyond DESIGN,
a keener social intuition, a rich visual + tonal vernacular, broadly read, a deep understanding of people. They need to be deeply-feeling themselves, and not Maslow's 'existential zombies.' They need an investigative & suspended disbelief, but also a discernment and sanity to prevent psychosis. Far beyond just buttons + sliders. Much closer to a novelist or anthropologist.
Beyond ENGINEER,
a deep-seated intuition of machine intelligence: how they traverse latent space, what they can / cannot do well. A scientific approach to prodding this 'grown-not-built' intelligence. Far beyond just CRUD apps. Practically: ability to fine-tune + benchmark models, among other skills, to bridge machine intelligence to the more design/humanistic.
FWIW: all this is very good for a field — software design — that has recently (and rightfully) become the butt of jokes, and seen as a very unserious discipline
Some news! After a long Twitter hiatus, I'm happy to announce that I'm going full-time @theloversmag ✨ We're launching something new called Spaces, a more personal careers page for teams 👫
👉 https://t.co/KRBybGvBRO
Oh, and the landing page was built in @framer 💚💙❤️
@laraisuncool - how to influence your team as a designer
- History of UX (historical UX failures, successes...etc)
- Evolution of UX + computing (how has computing and design evolved and how has that influenced human behaviour and culture)
- Are there cultural differences in ux?
@JessGaddis Both probably. I was able to interview last year without a portfolio (just had a chat with hiring manager) but you will almost always been a deck for indepth portfolio/project reviews.
TL;DR: Website for initial outreach, deck for portfolio review interview