@elonmusk Boiling frog
100% planned and very skilled
Watch the redefinition of Charles as protector of s multi faith society - and the army being loyal to the King..
This is clever and devious
🔥👀 UNREAL… YOU CANT UNSEE IT.
What if I told you the woman who attempted to smear Elon as “far right” in her Economist interview … Zanny Minton Beddoes and said people “LOATHE” him is the same one who flew into Kyiv for a curated tour and called Zelensky “immensely brave”.
What if I told you she called Zelensky the avatar for the entire Ukrainian people” in 2022 and she had unprecedented ACCESS to the war room instantly?
What if I told you she’s on the Bilderberg Steering Committee and a permanent Davos regular and has attended at least 5 of them?
NOW what if I told you Zanny’s husband Sebastian Mallaby has written extensively about George Soros in the 2022 book George Soros: A Life in Full.
Now what if I told you Chatham House (linked to Zanny via her late father-in-law) has received over $3.5 million+ from Open Society Foundations in just the grants publicly listed since 2020 including a dedicated $200k Ukraine package in 2024 ALONE.
What if I told you Canadian PM Mark served as a President of Chatham House from 2024 until 2025 when Carney was he was elected?
Open Society Foundation is still listed as one of their top institutional funders to this date.
Gets crazier.
Now what if I told you and in 2008 he PERSONALLY moderated a CFR (Council on Foreign Relations) panel with Georgie S was sitting right next to him.
So George was trying to assist Kerry in 2004 & pouring millions into anti-Bush protests George attacked the Middle East Wars.
4 years later he would pour millions into the Obama & Clinton campaigns in 2008.
Years later his foundations put more than $230 million into Ukraine including support for civil society groups active during the protests What is his goal?
Zanny also did an interview with Bill Gates where he was calling for more government expenditure on vaccines AND predicted the pandemic would cease around the end of 2021.
Connect the dots… Pro endless Ukraine funding…. Davos elite attendee.
That’s exactly why the questions to Elon were so aggressive while she coddled others. She’s a TRANSLANTICIST as @MikeBenzCyber would say.
Just weeks after the war started she flew into Kyiv and fawned over Zelensky like a propaganda piece calling him “immensely brave” and the avatar of his people while he suspended elections… kept martial law going… and fed older men into the meat grinder.
She gave Bill Gates the same soft treatment.
Then she went after Elon Musk.
The man accelerating clean energy, landing reusable rockets, keeping Ukraine online with Starlink, advancing Neuralink, and defending free speech on the last major open platform.
Zanny glows over the ones who fit the script… and attacks the one actually pushing humanity forward.
That’s not journalism.
That’s defending the club.
Are we getting it yet?
@benfromqc@elonmusk The studies of the rats that lived in Utopia has been replicated already in the western world; lower fertility, debachuchery, violence and madness.
Rats loosing primary purpose spiraled into madness - and society ended.
The same with Rome.
We need to figure out purpose
@elonmusk And to make sure that societies on earth develop in a direction of truth and fact, and not be overwhelmed with distortion, censorship and brutality
.
We applaud you fornyer foresight, and we will work to bring about true freedom to all nations
Elon Musk was called a racist on camera by the editor-in-chief of The Economist.
An accusation that serious should have come with proof. Hers came from no one.
Zanny Minton Beddoes: “People say that you’re a racist.”
People say.
No evidence. No incident. No source. No name.
“People say” removes the journalist’s fingerprints from the accusation. Nothing to verify. No one to hold accountable.
A label laundered through a question so it can never be traced back to a fact.
Musk: “My partner is half Indian. I have four children with her. One of them was named after a famous Indian physicist. If you look at the people employed at my companies, we have senior executives of all races.”
The accusation cost nothing to make. The defense required a man to put his own family on the table.
Then she moved on. No pause. Not one word of his answer made it into the next question.
Beddoes: “Are you anti-Muslim?”
The first accusation was still on the ground. The next was already in the air.
Musk: “I’m against people coming to a country with antithetical views. I’m against rape and murder. I’m against the imposition of rules and laws that are contrary to what we’ve come to accept in the West.”
He answered with positions no functioning society disputes. The only way to make them sound like bigotry was to attach a religion to the people he was describing.
That isn’t journalism. It’s a trap where the question does the accusing and the answer does the rest.
Musk: “I think it’s a crying shame that the traditional media, like you, don’t recognize this.”
To her face. To the editor-in-chief of one of the most powerful publications on Earth.
When a man has to prove he isn’t a racist by naming his own children, then defend himself for opposing rape and murder, the labels have stopped describing the world. They’ve started building one.
The accusation was never meant to be true. It was meant to be answered.
Because the moment you’re defending yourself against a label, the label has already done its work. And when no answer can acquit you, you were never being accused. You were being sentenced.
The presumption of innocence was never a description of how people think. It was a wall built against it. Four centuries putting it up. A decade taking it down.
Musk didn’t accept the frame. He answered with facts and let the accusations collapse on contact, then told the person holding the microphone that she was the problem.
The weapon only works on people who flinch. He didn’t.
And the accusation that came from no one finally had a name on it. Hers.
How does a country make itself safe and productive?
Great Britain did it with Christianity—and by executing or imprisoning the worst males in every generation for hundreds of years.
By the 1960s, the country was so civilized that policeman carried nothing but a nightstick, everybody queued without a second thought, and newspaper boxes were left unlocked on the high street.
Britain had become a so-called high trust society — less euphemistically, an honest society.
Something similar—without the Christianity—transpired in Japan.
What happens to such a country if it forgets how difficult that was to attain?
The Brits found out. And then denied it.
https://t.co/xbdCHNknd3
Nicklas Nilsson förklarar skillnaden mellan höger och vänstermänniskor i klockren text på Facebook:
"Om en högerpolitisk person är bög, så är han det, och bryr sig inte om vad andra tycker.
Om en vänster är bög, så kräver han lagändringar, protesterar mot allt och alla, och gör det till en politisk kamp.
Om en höger är vegan, så äter han helt enkelt inte kött.
Om en vänster är vegan, så vill han förbjuda kött, stoppa matproduktionen och protestera utanför bondgårdar och hönsfarmer.
Om en höger inte gillar vapen, så köper han inga.
Om en vänster inte gillar vapen, så försöker han förbjuda dem, hindra alla andra från att äga ett, och hatar dem som har.
Om en höger oroar sig för klimatet, så flyger han mindre, kör elbil om det passar honom och sorterar sitt avfall.
Om en vänster oroar sig för klimatet, så vill han förbjuda fossilbilar, flygresor och kött för alla andra, protestera utanför fabriker och kräva att staten tvingar fram förändringen.
Om en höger vill ge sina barn en bra skolgång, så flyttar han till ett område med bra skolor, eller väljer en privatskola eller engagerar sig själv.
Om en vänster vill ge sina barn en bra skolgång, så kräver han mer skattepengar från alla, lika resultat för alla, förbud mot friskolor och protesterar mot varje skillnad.
Om en höger klagar på sitt jobb eller arbetsplats.. det gör han det inte. Han byter jobb eller startar ett eget företag.
Om en vänster klagar på sitt jobb – så är det chefen, företaget eller kollegorna det är fel på. Han kräver kollektivavtal, strejk, förändringar för hela orten och protesterar mot företaget så att det ska passa honom.
Om en höger är missnöjd med sin bostad eller hyra, så flyttar han, renoverar eller köper något annat.
Om en vänster är missnöjd med sin bostad eller hyra, så kräver han hyresstopp, mer bidrag, regleringar för alla och protesterar mot hyresvärdar och politiker.
Om en höger misslyckas med en affär eller en investering som går snett, så reser han sig upp, dammar av sig och försöker igen imorgon.
Om en vänster har slut på pengar den 24:e, så skyller han på att de rika har för mycket och måste bidra mer, skyller på att lotterivinsten inte gick hem förra veckan och muttrar att han har så himla otur.
Om en höger ser det här – så skickar han det till några kompisar för ett gott skratt.
Om en vänster ser det här – så försöker han argumentera emot, få det bortplockat och radera mig från Facebook."
This story is actually insane. The police picked up a 16 yr old girl that was kidnapped by Omar (the guy Shiloh Hendrix insulted) and his brother at a gas station. They raped her for two days. She was found "sleep-deprived, dehydrated, and had not eaten recently" according to the nurse that examined her.
They found her glasses in their trailer. She identified them perfectly in a lineup.
Then, in the middle of the case, prosecutors discretely dropped charges with no explanation and no oversight. "In the interest of justice," they said.
This was just one month before the Shiloh Hendrix incident. During the Shiloh Hendrix trial, we find out that Omar's son, who is actually 9 even though it was claimed he was 5, already wears a ankle monitor because his father lets him wander off and steal things. As is expected, the father has faced no consequences for this.
In Minnesota, a single word is worse than kidnapping and raping a young girl. Two Somalian men abducted a young, vulnerable girl, then were shielded by the government and faced zero consequences. Personally, I think the charges were dropped to avoid their deportation.
On the flip side, a productive member of society gets probation, a jail sentence, and 200 hours of community service over a single word, with no violence involved in any way.
We can't live like this. We can't live in a country where foreigners are above the law, yet get to twist the law into a weapon against productive American citizens.
Seeing first-hand different parts of Greater Manchester and how they’ve been demographically vandalised and bastardised beyond any recognition by mass immigration? It is so very depressing.
You could be standing in the middle of Pakistan, and you wouldn’t know the difference.
British communities have been forced out. Not over centuries, but years. Local men and women have watched these streets change in the most thorough and ruthlessly efficient manner.
The working class who built Greater Manchester have been driven out of certain streets, neighbourhoods and even towns.
Replaced.
In the most part? By one culture. By one religion. By one way of life.
Islam.
So let’s call it what it is.
Colonisation.
It’s happened there, I saw for myself. It will happen elsewhere.
I felt uncomfortable on those streets. I can only imagine how women feel, late at night and alone. The vast majority just don’t go. Unwelcome in their own town.
The good people of Greater Manchester have an opportunity on Thursday to register their discontent. Their anger. Their fury.
Marlon West, our candidate, knows what happens better than anyone when these parallel communities and legal systems are able to effectively police themselves, and it ends with vulnerable white girls getting abused and raped. It happened to his daughter, and it’s happened to thousands and thousands of other daughters across the region. It continues today, and every day.
Restore Britain is offering a democratic route out.
On Thursday, thousands and thousands of Greater Manchester men and women will take it.
🚨 AMERICA’S WORST NIGHTMARE JUST GOT CALLED OUT LIVE ON NATIONAL TV 🚨
Sid Rosenberg went ABSOLUTELY BERSERK and said what nobody else will:
“This guy is a TERRORIST. That’s the bottom line. I’LL SAY IT. He’s a terrorist. He’s a JIHADIST. He hates the Jewish people. He hates America. He hates the Italian people. He hates the Irish people. He hates the German people.”
“Those two people stabbed the other day in New York City — that blood is on HIS HANDS.”
“Unless you’re Muslim, Mayor Mamdani has no use for you! He is a horrible person and maybe has perpetrated the worst American and Jewish hate in the history of this country!”
“That blood is on your hands, Mayor Mamdani! We got to find a way to get this guy out of here… this guy is the worst thing to happen to New York politics, maybe in the history of our state. He’s a lowlife!”
Fox host tried to pull him back: “I think you may be a bit over your skis calling him a terrorist…”
Rosenberg didn’t flinch: “You don’t have to kill somebody to be a terrorist. You have to share the ideology.”
Mamdani is being called a jihadist and a terrorist… and right now he is looking like America’s worst nightmare.
Is this the most dangerous mayor in American history? Drop a 🔥 if you agree. Share this before they try to bury it.