@fet_my29252@yhwyyhwy It was already one of their ideas. Look at the Economist magazine for 2026. Pay attention to the missile flying into the 250th anniversary cake
@manfromnazareth@yhwyyhwy If there isn't a false flag during the WC, then look out for 2027. If nothing happens in 2027, then I'm finished with any of these theories
@NilsBabcock73 No, Jesus didn't lie. He does whatever the Father does as it pertains to Divinity. Have you read this chapter? And secondly, where in this chapter does it say that the Father was born elsewhere. You're constantly repeating yourself going nowhere, like let's move forward!
I believe exactly what Jesus said. See above. Jesus came to earth as the savior of mankind. He was born of God the Father to a body of flesh and blood. A mortal body. Yet as God, he still retained power over life and death. He suffered the pains of mortality in all ways while in Gethsemane he took all of our pains and sins upon himself, then died what was meant by the pharisees to be an ignominius death, then rose again on the third day, taking up his body.
Before that, he stated clearly that he can do nothing but what he sees his Father do even as he prophesied his own death and resurrection.
Either Christ meant what he said or he lied. He never lies, forbhe is God and God is a god of truth, not lies.
Thus the only logical conclusion is that in another creation on a different world, God the Father was born exactly as Jesus Christ as savior of THAT world obtaining a physical body, living, suffering for all mankind, dying and being raised up.
@NilsBabcock73 Fam, drink water and come off social media, because clearly you're losing it. Firstly, what was the context of Christ's statement? I am going to walk you through sum, and you're eventually going to trip over your own unbiblical private interpretations
This 80 year old drunkard can cuss off Netanyahu all he wants, but he'll eventually fall back into line like a well trained dog. Either that, or this is another act. Happy birthday, Donald
@NilsBabcock73 The burden of proof is on you. You claimed that God the Father was born in another creation, even though Christ was simply talking about how He is the perfect representation of the Father as it pertains to Divinity. Don't run, present your evidence
@NilsBabcock73 Rubbish. The Bible is clear that only the Son was Incarnate. There's literally no verse talking about God the Father taking on flesh, and if you disagree with that statement, I'd like you to actually provide biblical evidence for your view. You're absolutely incorrect