Asphalt

Living life one step at a time | Liberal | Dogs ❤️ Cats 💖 |

[Asphalt @Siren_head1]

@sadist_2003 @amitmalviya was the problem

[Asphalt @Siren_head1]

@muskelon57977 @BJP4Puducherry @IYCLegalCell I too posted on my Insta story and will keep posting lmao

[Asphalt @Siren_head1]

@Kcpandey23 @Prakhar81420407 I know, I invest 17k in market too each month through SIP

Our stocks were overpriced and earnings had to catch up, and they are steadily, this will be the situation for more months until Geopolitical situation becomes better

Which it will, until then, calm and patience

[Asphalt @Siren_head1]

@Kcpandey23 @Prakhar81420407 This

[Prof. Krishnamurthy V Subramanian @SubramanianKri]

𝗧𝗵𝗲 "𝟮.𝟲% 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗹 𝗴𝗿𝗼𝘄𝘁𝗵 𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗲" 𝗰𝗹𝗮𝗶𝗺: a hilarious demonstration of economic ignorance on National TV.

𝗘𝗿𝗿𝗼𝗿 #𝟭: Take a nominal GDP number from the old series and compare it with a nominal GDP number from the new series. Divide one by the other and proclaim 2.6% "growth." That is comparing apples with oranges.

𝗙𝗮𝗰𝘁: When GDP series are revised, historical numbers are re-estimated using the same methodology to ensure an apples-to-apples comparison. Such an ECON 101 error!

𝗘𝗿𝗿𝗼𝗿 #𝟮: Use nominal GDP arithmetic to challenge a real GDP growth rate of 7.8%, while ignoring double deflation, a globally accepted methodology that India now adopts, and the actual constant-price estimates.

𝗘𝗿𝗿𝗼𝗿 #𝟯: Treat routine revisions, based on improved data and methodology, as "manipulation." Historical estimates are revised precisely because new data arrive and better information becomes available.

𝘚𝘶𝘤𝘩 𝘳𝘦𝘷𝘪𝘴𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘴 𝘩𝘢𝘱𝘱𝘦𝘯 𝘳𝘰𝘶𝘵𝘪𝘯���𝘭��, 𝘪𝘯𝘤𝘭𝘶𝘥𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘸𝘩𝘦𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘴𝘰𝘯 𝘮𝘢𝘬𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴 claim 𝘸𝘢𝘴 𝘪𝘯 𝘎𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘯𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵.

𝗘𝗿𝗿𝗼𝗿 #𝟰: Claim consumption growth was negative by committing the same errors, when official data show real private consumption grew 7.1%.

Claims about a supposedly "true GDP growth rate" manufactured by comparing incompatible numbers was not economics.

It was a hilarious demonstration of economic ignorance on National TV.

[Asphalt @Siren_head1]

@fatherofwest @Prakhar81420407 He is a angry old man, who is whining because Nirmala didn't let him issue the bonds that he wanted in 2019 which in lieu of COVID would had pushed the rupee 130 per $

For the 2.6% here is the truth

[Prof. Krishnamurthy V Subramanian @SubramanianKri]

𝗧𝗵𝗲 "𝟮.𝟲% 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗹 𝗴𝗿𝗼𝘄𝘁𝗵 𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗲" 𝗰𝗹𝗮𝗶𝗺: a hilarious demonstration of economic ignorance on National TV.

𝗘𝗿𝗿𝗼𝗿 #𝟭: Take a nominal GDP number from the old series and compare it with a nominal GDP number from the new series. Divide one by the other and proclaim 2.6% "growth." That is comparing apples with oranges.

𝗙𝗮𝗰𝘁: When GDP series are revised, historical numbers are re-estimated using the same methodology to ensure an apples-to-apples comparison. Such an ECON 101 error!

𝗘𝗿𝗿𝗼𝗿 #𝟮: Use nominal GDP arithmetic to challenge a real GDP growth rate of 7.8%, while ignoring double deflation, a globally accepted methodology that India now adopts, and the actual constant-price estimates.

𝗘𝗿𝗿𝗼𝗿 #𝟯: Treat routine revisions, based on improved data and methodology, as "manipulation." Historical estimates are revised precisely because new data arrive and better information becomes available.

𝘚𝘶𝘤𝘩 𝘳𝘦𝘷𝘪𝘴𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘴 𝘩𝘢𝘱𝘱𝘦𝘯 𝘳𝘰𝘶𝘵𝘪𝘯���𝘭��, 𝘪𝘯𝘤𝘭𝘶𝘥𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘸𝘩𝘦𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘴𝘰𝘯 𝘮𝘢𝘬𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴 claim 𝘸𝘢𝘴 𝘪𝘯 𝘎𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘯𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵.

𝗘𝗿𝗿𝗼𝗿 #𝟰: Claim consumption growth was negative by committing the same errors, when official data show real private consumption grew 7.1%.

Claims about a supposedly "true GDP growth rate" manufactured by comparing incompatible numbers was not economics.

It was a hilarious demonstration of economic ignorance on National TV.

[Asphalt @Siren_head1]

@Kcpandey23 @Prakhar81420407 Most of it

[Asphalt @Siren_head1]

@MeIndian03 Accha huwa Sonia aaur bete ko 2014 mai laath maarke bhaga diya 😂😂😂

[Asphalt @Siren_head1]

@Prakhar81420407 If they don't proportionately increase urban seats it will Seppuku of the Indian nation before Dehatis

[Asphalt @Siren_head1]

@CruelAndCouture @mujifren Bhai to itna information hai tere paas to court mai bol proof ke saath

Idhar ek case daala Brij Bhushan ne maanhaani ka tere pe to Puri jindagi paise dete rehna padega

[Asphalt @Siren_head1]

@AryamanBharat Reason for that being ?

[Asphalt @Siren_head1]

@MesoAnglic Tf ??

[Asphalt @Siren_head1]

@Prakhar81420407 Many Urban Dehatis too sadly but I get your point

[Asphalt @Siren_head1]

@ameetgsingh @RfYuvrajShinde @akshaywcam1 Thank God, my chosen Gov will still cut those trees and build metros in my city 😂😂

Tere liye bas 2 extra cut karne chahiye

[Asphalt @Siren_head1]

@YearOfTheKraken @bong_politics No way he said that omg 😭😭😭😭😭

I feel the next leadership of BJP will be from the East Yall

[Asphalt @Siren_head1]

@vrtrahan_ Panihati ?

[Asphalt @Siren_head1]

@vrtrahan_ Congratulations anyway bro

People like you have won it

[Asphalt @Siren_head1]

@madhavareddy55 @NewsAlgebraIND Why ?

I thought he was a good leader

[Asphalt @Siren_head1]

@Iyush004 @IndianTechGuide Why would I hire someone who will work less with same amount of money I can give to a male candidate?

Also less safety issues for males
No maternity leave
Go menstrual leave

I will always go for a male candidate ye to seedhi baat hai