Skeptical Ass

At this point, permanently skeptical

[Skeptical Ass @SkepticalAss]

You’re referring to the press as if they fulfill the role of the press as it was intended by the First Amendment.

At the same time you know very well that they abandoned all civic responsibility years ago.

They violate our social contract every day. They destroy the innocent to create a narrative. Get caught. And do it again the next month.

They follow no rules, and certainly no moral code.

They are overwhelmingly responsible for the toxic division between race, class and politics in our communities. They are the very reason we can’t have a rational conversation with anyone on the left.

They show no regret - no sign of stopping.

So why should they get special rights while they spend every waking hour pushing propaganda? Haven’t they abused those rights long enough?

How long do we play the role of honorable target?

What do we do to put them back in their lane, make a strong argument?

You have education and expertise and eloquence far beyond any gifts I will ever have. You have the words and skill to make that case. Make it.

Show us how us how to get them back to the point where they deserve the First Amendment.

[Melissa O'Connor @Melissa_in_CA]

Funny how same-day election results by 8:53 p.m. are possible when it’s 2021 and the whole state is voting on whether to recall Gavin Newsom.

[Skeptical Ass @SkepticalAss]

@therobbieharvey @MattWalshBlog It doesn’t matter.

The guy murdered him.

There are no conditions where a scuffle among high school students justifies murder.

None.

[Skeptical Ass @SkepticalAss]

@Eastsidecrazy67 @MattWalshBlog So a scuffle among high schoolers is justification for murder now?

That’s not a world I know.

[Skeptical Ass @SkepticalAss]

@CynicalPublius @infantrydort 😂😂😂

Did not see that one coming!

[Skeptical Ass @SkepticalAss]

The problem is in the misuse, when people who have control of the system use it against innocent citizens that they redefine as the enemy.

For decades we leaned into the idea that people who have that access could not be trusted to control their impulses.

I think we can all agree that’s manifestly obvious now.

The ‘secure in your person’ clause of the 4th amendment guarantees individual privacy. It’s been challenged and upheld by SCOTUS for decades. This is why LE can’t show up and demand your phone records, account statements, fingerprints, etc without a court order authorizing an investigation against you specifically.

SCOTUS have also ruled that if you’re in public, a picture/video of you or your vehicle is legal.

None of us were asked about this. We didn’t vote for a surveillance state. It was decided on a Tuesday while the rest of us were at work. Now that we’re aware, people are justifiably angry.

What it comes down to is what do we want? What do we as a society want?

I personally do not want the surveillance state in any of the forms that are evolving.

I absolutely do not trust the government. Anyone with their eyes open since 2009 probably agrees with me.

I am convinced that if you give them the infrastructure to use against us, someone will come along who will.

LE can solve crime without it. They’re pro. They’ve been doing it forever.

[Elon Musk @elonmusk]

Vote them out

[Skeptical Ass @SkepticalAss]

@Pro__Trading Same with Rodney King.

KTLA in Los Angeles played an edited version of it every 30m for weeks until the Compton riots erupted.

[Skeptical Ass @SkepticalAss]

@txsalth2o @TheEconomist The Economist is a yellow rag.

Besides, no one listens to Democrats.

[𝗦𝗵𝗼𝘄 𝗠𝗲 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗗𝗮𝘁𝗮 @txsalth2o]

@TheEconomist Maybe it has something to do with the mass raping of children…just spitballing here, the recent killing of an unarmed child.

Dunno, real mystery…

[Skeptical Ass @SkepticalAss]

@RealJamesWoods 🍻

[Skeptical Ass @SkepticalAss]

@ACLU_SC “South Carolinians” who are not illegal migrants, and who should be in South Carolina, are not the least bit “fearful”.

We see you.

We see your game.

The only person you’re fooling is yourself.

[Skeptical Ass @SkepticalAss]

@arigoldstein @RWMaloneMD ‘learn to enjoy approval through “the enemy” character assignations’

That explains a lot.

Thank you.

[Mike Collins War Room @TeamOverhaulGA]

🚨 Jon Ossoff just voted against the SAVE America Act.

80% of Americans support requiring an ID to vote.

But Jon Ossoff only supports checking ID at his rallies.

[Skeptical Ass @SkepticalAss]

@daveatherton @paulmasonnews @elonmusk You can’t have a rational conversation with the Left.

They live in a cocoon of layers of propaganda which create true defense in depth.

They are the human batteries of The Matrix.

PS: Note to lefties: notice how wrote that without a stream of vile and disgusting insults?

[Skeptical Ass @SkepticalAss]

@CarolineWren Your funny 😂

[Zia Yusuf @ZiaYusufUK]

I have written to Hampshire Police:

1) The body-cam footage directly contradicts the public statement made by Deputy Chief Constable Robert France.

DCC France claimed officers lacked "all of the information" and that Henry's injuries were hidden and internal.

The footage shows the opposite.

Before officers even handcuffed Henry, they were explicitly warned by a the murderer’s father that he had a "mouth full of blood" and couldn't hold himself up.

Henry himself clearly tells officers: "He stabbed me, I've been stabbed, I can't breathe."

The arresting officer's response?

"I don't think you have mate."

Henry was dragged across a driveway, handcuffed as a suspect rather than treated as a victim, and died minutes later. Judge Mousley KC’s sentencing remarks confirm Henry had a "clearly visible facial wound."

DCC France’s statement is misleading, indefensible, and a potential breach of Police Conduct Regulations. 

2) DCC France’s statement implies that the police considered it justifiable to take what was claimed by an ethnic minority family as absolute fact.

Upon being presented with a man that has a "mouth full of blood", that "keeps dropping side to side" and repeats "I've been stabbed, l've been stabbed, I can't breathe, the arresting officer's response was "I don't think you have mate."

Attending officers had more than enough information to treat Henry as the victim, not the suspect.

Hampshire Police’s "Race Action Plan" embeds anti-white racism in its operations, which today’s reports in The Times reveal has left rank-and-file officers feeling "controlled and pressured."

The Police Race Action Plan, launched under the Tory Government, demands that Police Officers “(do) not treat everyone the same”, nor be “colour blind”.

The public deserves to know:

How has this plan operationalised policing? 

We need answers.

WE WILL NOT LET THIS REST

[Skeptical Ass @SkepticalAss]

Yes, this 💯🎯

The bleeding heart apologists overlook the fact that the perp worked out, long before the event, what action he would take given a certain condition.

That decision, that planned response, is between him and him alone.

From that point forward he’s locked and loaded.

The argument that ‘well he was spooked, confused, insulted, whatever…’ doesn’t fly. 98% of humanity would not immediately murder someone because of a momentary event.

The man who does commits a pre-meditated response to stimuli he pre-determined justified murder.

[Skeptical Ass @SkepticalAss]

@MaddyJean19 @pattistanger @POTUS Grok reports that older elections data are not always retained and n the tracker.

Linked below.

Thanks for this post though. It prompted me to research ballot tracking 🍻

https://t.co/mBRspR3Le3

[Skeptical Ass @SkepticalAss]

@lamps_apple “for absolute moral integrity”

The Democrat Party?

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

[Pino Americano @PinoAmericano]

If we are speaking honestly and objectively, Senate Republicans have done more to stop and delay the Trump agenda than Democrats ever thought was possible.