Skin in the Game

I’m a 69 yr old Skiwi (Scottish Kiwi) woman. Free speech free choice. ❤️ Yeshua ❤️the Truth ❤️ my God given freedom.

[The Carnivore RN @wilsonhlthcoach]

"But you weren't forced to get it."

That's a line I will never forget.

No we weren't forced. We were just told that we can't work if we don't get it.

We can't provide for our family. We'll risk losing our home.

We were told that we must not care about our kids if we're willing to lose our job over a "simple little shot."

We had people laughing at us for not wanting it.

We heard, "Just get the shot! There's nothing to be afraid of. Don't be scared. It's not going to hurt you."

Our families pleaded with us to get it. Told us they were worried we would end up in the hospital or die if we didn't get it.

We saw people around us getting it. We kept hearing them talk about how great it felt to get it and "do their part to slow the spread, to protect others."

We were told that if we get it, we can go places. We can go out to dinner, go to concerts and sporting events, get on an airplane.

Our employer told us that if we really didn't want it, we needed to fill out an exemption form.

We filled out the form but it was denied. We either had to get the shot or be terminated.

But through all of that, we still didn't get it.

Many of us ended up losing or leaving our jobs.

So no, we weren't "forced to get it."

We were coerced and bullied into getting it.

We didn't fear covid. We feared not being able to take care of our kids or pay the bills if we lost our jobs.

But, we still didn't get it.

And guess what? We're glad we didn't get it.

[Wide Awake Media @wideawake_media]

"CO₂ is the gas of life."

Renowned astrophysicist and geoscientist Dr. Willie Soon refutes claims that CO₂ is a harmful gas responsible for global warming, hurricanes, and extreme weather events.

He dismisses such claims as "nonsense".

"I've published scientific papers refuting all of these arguments."

[Gad Saad @GadSaad]

Is this Islam, Islamism, Islamismism, or Islamismismism?

[The Consultant @TheConsultant18]

🔵 NZ 🇳🇿 is small country & over governed
NZ has far too many MP's for its tax payer base.
One has too admit there is a stack of NZ MP's that are lazy grifters adding no productivity.
How did they manage spend $3.4 million colonial dollars on domestic travel in nine months?

[New Zealand Taxpayers' Union @TaxpayersUnion]

When it comes out to taxpayer pockets, it's easy to spend.

Full paper here: https://t.co/l6WRao9wih

[Skin in the Game @Skininthe69Game]

@Evie_B2 @JamesOnekaka @DonaldTrump 🙌🙌🙌

[Skin in the Game @Skininthe69Game]

Regarding the recent activities of USA and the west. Brilliant.

[Skin in the Game @Skininthe69Game]

@Coltheman1 🤣😂🤣

[Alex Jones @RealAlexJones]

A Congressman who bizarrely killed 118 beagle dogs, and who can’t speak English has introduced a bill to ban ICE..

[Catturd ™ @catturd2]

Well, he’s not wrong.

[NZ and the MRNA @HopeRising19]

AT LAST OUR NEW ZEALAND mRNA HARMED ARE BEING GIVEN A VOICE...

We are SO excited to finally be launching our Tribute to New Zealand's Covid mRNA injured.

The Tribute NZ is an ongoing weekly docuseries giving a voice to New Zealander's whose lives have been turned upside down by the Pfizer mRNA Many of them were mandated to take it....against their wishes...in order to keep their job, and a roof over their children's head.

Our first episode is launching this Thursday 15th January 2026. Ange will be sharing her journey of 4 long years of serious multi system Pfizer mRNA harm.

Please subscribe (see links in the post below) to ensure you never miss an episode.

Having been declined for every single funding source in New Zealand (so many applications), we are totally reliant on crowd funding to keep this project alive.

This is the ONLY way our mRNA harmed in New Zealand will ever be given a voice to share their stories widely.

Thank you for even the smallest financial support you can offer our project

https://t.co/R0oQYwSV6a

@TheTributeNZED

[Drew Pavlou 🇦🇺🇺🇸🇺🇦🇹🇼 @DrewPavlou]

The new Australian hate speech laws will make it illegal to call for the deportation of Islamic extremists.

Meanwhile they include a carve out clause to ensure that Islamic hate preachers can say whatever they want provided they say it is in their religion.

Nightmare

[Elon Musk @elonmusk]

Does seem low

[Andrew Bridgen @ABridgen]

These are the words of the first 16 scientists of 46 that have left the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) due to the corruption of science within the organisation.

Dr Robert Balling: The IPCC notes that “No significant acceleration in the rate of sea level rise during the 20th century has been detected.” This did not appear in the IPCC Summary for Policymakers.

Dr Lucka Bogataj: “Rising levels of airborne carbon dioxide don’t cause global temperatures to rise…. temperature changed first and some 700 years later a change in aerial content of carbon dioxide followed.”

Dr John Christy: “Little known to the public is the fact that most of the scientists involved with the IPCC do not agree that global warming is occurring. Its findings have been consistently misrepresented and/or politicized with each succeeding report.”

Dr Rosa Compagnucci: “Humans have only contributed a few tenths of a degree to warming on Earth. Solar activity is a key driver of climate.”

Dr Richard Courtney: “The empirical evidence strongly indicates that the anthropogenic global warming hypothesis is wrong.”

Dr Judith Curry: “I’m not going to just spout off and endorse the IPCC because I don’t have confidence in the process.”

Dr Robert Davis: “Global temperatures have not been changing as state of the art climate models predicted they would. Not a single mention of satellite temperature observations appears in the IPCC Summary for Policymakers.”

Dr Willem de Lange: “In 1996 the IPCC listed me as one of approximately 3000 “scientists” who agreed that there was a discernible human influence on climate. I didn’t. There is no evidence to support the hypothesis that runaway catastrophic climate change is due to human activities.”

Dr Chris de Freitas: “Government decision-makers should have heard by now that the basis for the long-standing claim that carbon dioxide is a major driver of global climate is being questioned; along with it the hitherto assumed need for costly measures to restrict carbon dioxide emissions. If they have not heard, it is because of the din of global warming hysteria that relies on the logical fallacy of ‘argument from ignorance’ and predictions of computer models.”

Dr Oliver Frauenfeld: “Much more progress is necessary regarding our current understanding of climate and our abilities to model it.”

Dr Peter Dietze: “Using a flawed eddy diffusion model, the IPCC has grossly underestimated the future oceanic carbon dioxide uptake.”

Dr John Everett: “It is time for a reality check. The oceans and coastal zones have been far warmer and colder than is projected in the present scenarios of climate change. I have reviewed the IPCC and more recent scientific literature and believe that there is not a problem with increased acidification, even up to the unlikely levels in the most-used IPCC scenarios.”

Dr Eigil Friis-Christensen: “The IPCC refused to consider the sun’s effect on the Earth’s climate as a topic worthy of investigation. The IPCC conceived its task only as investigating potential human causes of climate change.”

Dr Lee Gerhard: “I never fully accepted or denied the anthropogenic global warming concept until the furore started after NASA’s James Hansen’s wild claims in the late 1980s. I went to the [scientific] literature to study the basis of the claim, starting with first principles. My studies then led me to believe that the claims were false.”

Dr Indur Goklany: “Climate change is unlikely to be the world’s most important environmental problem of the 21st century. There is no signal in the mortality data to indicate increases in the overall frequencies or severities of extreme weather events, despite large increases in the population at risk.”

Dr Vincent Gray: “The [IPCC] climate change statement is an orchestrated litany of lies.”

[NZ and the MRNA @HopeRising19]

W.H.O. HAS NEARLY 6 MILLION ADVERSE EVENTS FOR COVID VACCINES IN THEIR DATABASE....

LET'S LOOK AT THE CARDIAC ADVERSE EVENTS...

Earlier this week I shared a short video of the W.H.O. database in which adverse events for COVID VACCINES are stored.

There are nearly 6 MILLION Covid vaccine adverse events in the database.

It is a compilation of adverse events collated by individual countries through their pharmacovigilance databases.

Reporting to these databases is voluntary....and under reporting is HUGE.

To give you an example, NZ Medsafe database is considered one of the highest reporting rates in the world...with approximately 5% of ACTUAL adverse events reported there.

Following my video I had online pushback from people saying....

"yes but 6 million reports means nothing because they are mostly a sore arm".

So now I'm taking you back to the WHO database for a second looks at the CARDIAC EVENTS

A sore arm?

I don't think so

PS yes I know a report is not proof of causality...but the intention of the database is to detect safety signals. What does it take to acknowledge a safety signal!!

[Skin in the Game @Skininthe69Game]

🙌🙌🙌🙌🙌🙌

[Gilda.Kirkpatrick @Strange_G]

Our second Rally in Auckland NewZealand for a free Iran.
Saturday 17th

[Skin in the Game @Skininthe69Game]

🙌🙌🙌

[Mario Nawfal @MarioNawfal]

🇺🇸 ELON JUST CALLED THE EU'S BLUFF - OPEN SOURCING X'S ALGORITHM IN 6 DAYS

@ElonMusk is making X's entire recommendation algorithm public January 17th. Every line of code showing what posts you see and why.

Then updating it every 4 weeks with developer notes.

This is a direct response to France classifying X as an "organized gang," the same legal designation they use for drug cartels and mafia, so they could wiretap employee phones and demand algorithm access.

The EU wants control over what people see online. They fined X $140 million last month, launched probes into "algorithm abuse," and demanded researchers get data access. France wants "experts" to analyze X's code to "uncover the truth" about the platform.

Elon's response: "You want the algorithm? Here's the algorithm. Everyone gets it."

This is 4D chess. EU regulators wanted private access to modify and control.

Instead they're getting public disclosure they can't manipulate. Every competing platform, every researcher, every government on Earth gets the same code at the same time.

You can't secretly pressure someone to censor when the censorship mechanism is open source.

My prediction: EU loses its mind, threatens more fines.

Elon doesn't care. Other platforms forced to follow or look like they're hiding something.

If that's not a classic Elon, what is?

Source: ZeroHedge, Epoch Times

[Elon Musk @elonmusk]

Wow