@TPPSkol Listen to the video folks. CC quote ends at GM. The bald guy infers "not the coaches guy". I dont care who the qb is, but PPs got a hard on for JJ that has lasted well over 4 hours. Seek medical attention
@JeffSmi25057426@MVCsports Big Ten. Top four seeds 3 games 3 days. Same with Big 12 ACC Big East SEC and every league in DI. Except the Valley. Yeah. Makes perfect sense
@TPPSkol@Charley_Walters Here's a hot take. There's probably a reason Charley hasn't been hired as GM. Trading a top 10 pick after only b 10 starts AND thinking a 3rd round would be enough compensation? Dumb even for Twin Cities scribes. Congrats
@SeifertESPN So members of the media like yourself create the narrative that he wants to be traded and its up to him to field a question about that narrative thar he didn't create to your satisfaction. Got it
Hey @espn . There is a reason a lot of us don't watch The Pat McAfee Show, so please tell Roxy to stop verbally felating him during the broadcast of the Supers
@nacholeber The problem is ESPN has gone to this model of talking heads arguing back and forth and they have to fill time. So they have to over sensationalize everything. This is nothing more than click bait and time filler. I wish they would do less self promotion and more highlights.
@DustBaker Hasn't anybody thought that the reason Darnold went to Seattle was because it was a better situation? With everything else being equal, he chose Seattle because the job was his. No looking over his shoulder. His job. So Darnold chise to sign with Seattle.
@hawkgawd@rathjen_caleb Yes. How he keeps getting assigned national tournaments is beyond me. He decides before the match which corner he's going to listen to.
@ESPNLunardi I'll make it easy for you. No team should be CONSIDERED for an at large bid if they are not above 500 in their league. Stop rewarding mediocrity. And if Auburn's argument is because the SEC is tough, true, but it isn't because of you
It's turning into a joke that we reward teams for finishing below 500 in their league. How is that considered successful? I'd rather see a highly successful mid major get rewarded than a bad power 4. You can no longer be taken seriously if you are even talking about Auburn.
@ESPNLunardi why are you and every talking head so eager to reward teams like Auburn. They should not be in the discussion! At large bids should only go to teams who are having a successful season. 7-11 in your conference does not equal a successful season.