Skulley

[Skulley @Skullay2]

@adornochrome Warum sollte dieser "autoritäre Charakter" der in den Leuten schlummert aber auch nicht dazu führen dass sie einfach eine härtere wehrhafte Demokratie wollen oder Stalinismus?

[Skulley @Skullay2]

@R_OliverDV8 @secretemperor00 @22toGod @Austrovicz @antifantti @The_Davos_Man You would have to become an incredibly successful capitalist to reach that level. It's quite unlikely that someone like this would then argue for an economy where he gets stripped of his wealth and power.

[Skulley @Skullay2]

@Grossefrodo @Nadimo1312 Es geht darum welche außenpolitische Blamage und Komplikation es ist wenn der Präsident des großen Verbündeten ein gegen-Narrativ verbreitet zu einer Sache die ein weiterer guter Grund sein soll um härter gegen Russland vorzugehen.

[Skulley @Skullay2]

@CharmCtyGroyper @FargoMcSimpson @Deepx5lv @secretemperor00 @Austrovicz @antifantti @The_Davos_Man Surely the labor on farms that especially cheap migrants are being utilized for is the exact opposite of that.

[Skulley @Skullay2]

@R_OliverDV8 @secretemperor00 @22toGod @Austrovicz @antifantti @The_Davos_Man You can talk about the points but that doesn't make your arguments less dogshit.

[Skulley @Skullay2]

@R_OliverDV8 @secretemperor00 @22toGod @Austrovicz @antifantti @The_Davos_Man No they don't and as a matter of fact someone can be an extreme piece of shit and be irresponsible as it gets and still have a good critique of capitalism and share a communist position. Those aren't mutually exclusive concepts.

[Skulley @Skullay2]

@cwtscx @FargoMcSimpson @22toGod @secretemperor00 @Austrovicz @antifantti @The_Davos_Man Because you're more interested in morally separating choices of consumption between corporations than actually having an understanding of the economy that they're producing under.

[Skulley @Skullay2]

@MarcAurel1337 @nymoen_ole @simondressler Es scheint ja dennoch eine gemeinsame Identität zwischen beiden zu geben welche sie überhaupt zu einem Nationalismus macht.

[Skulley @Skullay2]

@R_OliverDV8 @secretemperor00 @22toGod @Austrovicz @antifantti @The_Davos_Man Then don't go throwing some random crap at a communist if you don't even know what they want or what their criticism is about. That's just embarrassing.

[Skulley @Skullay2]

@R_OliverDV8 @secretemperor00 @22toGod @Austrovicz @antifantti @The_Davos_Man Communism isn't a philosophy nor a way of life for consumer habits or dietary principles like vegetarianism/veganism. That's where the error starts that makes you want to point out a hypocrisy.

[Skulley @Skullay2]

@Haitian_Heat @JohnSmi96964607 @antifantti @The_Davos_Man "They believe capitalism is exploitation but overindulge in the fruits of exploitation?"
You can very much "overindulge" in its products while having an issue with how these products are being produced and wanting to change that especially if there is no alternative to it.

[Skulley @Skullay2]

@FargoMcSimpson @cwtscx @22toGod @secretemperor00 @Austrovicz @antifantti @The_Davos_Man This person thinks that multi-billion dollar heavy companies like Xiaomi and Huawei aren't emblematic of capitalism but Apple is because it got higher mainstream appeal. This is the level of intellect that we're arguing against.

[Skulley @Skullay2]

@Jucktqel @secretemperor00 @22toGod @Austrovicz @antifantti @The_Davos_Man At least you're honest that it's nothing more than the "you don't like capitalism yet you consume its products" idiocy.

[Skulley @Skullay2]

@Jucktqel @secretemperor00 @22toGod @Austrovicz @antifantti @The_Davos_Man If something works as intended the intended purpose can cause issues for people affected by it. You lack basic logical thinking.

[Skulley @Skullay2]

@Jucktqel @secretemperor00 @22toGod @Austrovicz @antifantti @The_Davos_Man If you would understand that those values that you speak of only exist in your head and are not the subject of criticism about this economy for a communist you would also understand how this is not a question of hypocrisy.

[Skulley @Skullay2]

@Berthold_Skull @RedCommieD @The_Davos_Man How can you be so sure that dictating to others what kind of phone or watch they’re allowed to have is a principle of her - one that she’s now violating?

[Skulley @Skullay2]

@R_OliverDV8 @secretemperor00 @22toGod @Austrovicz @antifantti @The_Davos_Man So if I want a functioning phone for the next few years that is at a proper technological level I have to go through the hassle of finding someone in my surroundings who sells one in decent enough quality and if done then what exactly is being won out of it?

[Skulley @Skullay2]

@Jucktqel @secretemperor00 @22toGod @Austrovicz @antifantti @The_Davos_Man Go and ask her personally if judging someone by the choice of their phone and watch is part of her value system. However that is not a fundamental critique against capitalism but an idiotic consumer critique.

[Skulley @Skullay2]

@Jucktqel @secretemperor00 @22toGod @Austrovicz @antifantti @The_Davos_Man You don't resolve or fix an issue that works and functions as intended to begin with. You abolish it. That's not being done by appealing to the consumer choice of an individual.

[Skulley @Skullay2]

@Jucktqel @secretemperor00 @22toGod @Austrovicz @antifantti @The_Davos_Man Your dumbass mistakes a communist critique with one that pertains to individual consumer habits which is where you even get the idea of "hypocrisy" from.
Otherwise there is none.
To repeat myself for the 5th time: not an ounce of systemic thought but instead pure individualism.