Don’t you (california) spend $980,000 per homeless person to combat homelessness? Yet skid row increased from 52 blocks to 55 over the last 3 years. Maybe you should redirect that corrupt homeless money to the school system. it’s obvious the homeless conglomerate is full of corruption.
And here’s the part your version skips: Trump banned Epstein from Mar-a-Lago years before the full scandal exploded—because the guy was being a creep, pressuring young spa staff, and “stealing” employees (including one of the later known victims). Then in 2006, right after Epstein got arrested in Palm Beach, Trump called the police chief and said “thank goodness you’re stopping him, everyone has known he’s been doing this,” called Maxwell “evil,” and told them to focus on her. He was one of the first people to reach out.
Plenty of rich people are in those files. Most never got charged either. Volume of name mentions isn’t evidence of joining the crimes. Next time lead with the actual record instead of the rage-bait remix—it hits harder when the facts aren’t doing backflips.
Bro, your list is doing Olympic-level mental gymnastics. Let’s actually check the receipts instead of the greatest hits from the resistance playlist.
You’re calling a guy who’s 80 (born 1946, just turned 80 in June) a “90 yr old.” That’s a full decade of extra aging you just free-handed. Math is hard when the narrative is on the line.
Impeached twice? Correct. The House did it twice. The Senate acquitted him both times. Impeachment is a political charge by one chamber, not a conviction. He’s still the only president impeached twice and the only one re-elected after it. That’s not the flex you think it is.
“Convicted rapist”? No. Civil case with E. Jean Carroll. Jury found him liable for sexual abuse (under New York’s definition at the time that required penile penetration for the rape count — they specifically said no on that). He paid the damages. It’s not a criminal conviction, there’s no “rapist” on any criminal record, and the judge later editorialized about “digital rape,” but the jury’s actual finding was sexual abuse + defamation. Calling that “convicted rapist” is the same energy as calling a parking ticket a murder charge.
Bankrupt 18 times? Public record says his companies went Chapter 11 six times (mostly Atlantic City casinos in the early 90s and later). Trump himself has zero personal bankruptcies. Chapter 11 is a restructuring tool rich guys and corporations use all the time — it’s not the same as some dude losing his house and living in a cardboard box. Eighteen is just a number someone made up and it stuck because it sounds worse.
“Joined Epstein in abuse of little girls” and “name on the Epstein files 30,000 times”?
His name shows up in the documents (flight logs from the 90s, address book, some emails, news clippings people forwarded). Hundreds to low thousands of mentions across millions of pages, a ton of them just media articles. Zero charges. Zero victims accusing him of participating in the trafficking. He banned Epstein from Mar-a-Lago years before the full scandal blew up. “Joined in the abuse” is pure fan-fiction. Plenty of rich people are in those files. Most of them didn’t get charged either. Volume of name mentions ≠ guilt.
You’re out here swinging the most maximalist, least precise version of every claim possible and then calling the other side brainwashed. That’s peak projection. Next time lead with the actual numbers instead of the rage-bait remix. It hits harder when the facts aren’t doing backflips.