#SUPREME

LDN

[#SUPREME @SlickBlocka]

Sweeping a high/low then not breaking the opposing side is all i see these days with $XAU so boring. Manipulation at its finest

[#SUPREME @SlickBlocka]

Another day and yet still no response from @QtFunded at this point i believe theyre avoiding me. They managed to see a comment on instagram and further timed me out for that apparently even though all ive done is say the truth. Theyre choosing what they respond to clearly

[#SUPREME @SlickBlocka]

Im not going to stop going public about this scamming prop. You better make the decision to do the right thing and pay me what i am owed because at this point youre literally scamming me @QtFunded @QuantTekel this is madness

[#SUPREME @SlickBlocka]

at this point they’re taking the piss. They extended my time out and i wasnt even off the initial time out. I havent spoken in the chat. First image is the new time out and the second image from the 9th meaning my time out was about to end after 7days. @QtFunded wtf

[#SUPREME @SlickBlocka]

Just remember i requested my payout on the 6th of august. This kinda behaviour is unacceptable. The least you could have done is to respond within the timeframe which you promised. How much longer must i wait for you to fix your mistake quant tekel @QuantTekel @QtFunded

[#SUPREME @SlickBlocka]

Day 12 waiting for a response from the risk & payouts team its getting ridiculous. Ive sent a second email on 11th September. False allegations with no proof because there is no proof. Delay after delay, unnecessary restrictions . Do something about this @QtFunded @QuantTekel

[#SUPREME @SlickBlocka]

Another day of waiting for a response from qt risk and passes team. Continuously delaying and avoiding my to face the lies @QtFunded

[#SUPREME @SlickBlocka]

Even if i did stack my positions (which I didnt) its not a rule. You’re allowed to layer/stack your positions. You had a layer rule and you removed it. Hence why i cant find it when i search your website. You tell me are you gonna go out sad like this. Worst excuse ever @QtFunded

[#SUPREME @SlickBlocka]

Heres the details. Theyre confusing taking partials as a new independent order because theyre system isnt smart enough to detect a partial. Thats not my fault. You can compare the open and closes. reference back to the log to understand these are 1 positions per trade @QtFunded

[#SUPREME @SlickBlocka]

tell me to open a ticket for support. Im told response will be made 24-72 hours. No reply was made for more than 144hours which is double their max advised timeframe. Just for them to tell me to email the relevant team as if they are not apart of the same company @QtFunded

[#SUPREME @SlickBlocka]

Multiple time outs for talking the truth on the channel. You guys try to hide the truth but it will come out @QtFunded

[#SUPREME @SlickBlocka]

Otherwise, I request that my account status be restored and my pending payout processed.@QtFunded
Sincerely.

[#SUPREME @SlickBlocka]

If you maintain that a breach occurred, please reply with the exact ticket IDs, timestamps, and raw server logs demonstrating two or more simultaneously active positions… this is mine @QtFunded

[#SUPREME @SlickBlocka]

Requested Resolution
I request an immediate manual review of my account by a senior risk manager, looking directly at the parent order ticket IDs rather than secondary partial-exit tickets. @QtFunded

[#SUPREME @SlickBlocka]

Retroactively applying a broad platform breach almost a month after a payout request—without providing timestamped execution logs—is unfair and unreasonable. @QtFunded

[#SUPREME @SlickBlocka]

After holding my payout request for nearly four weeks, a Risk Interview was scheduled for September 2, 2026.
The scheduled interview was missed/cancelled without attendance, followed immediately by this boilerplate rejection notice. @QtFunded

[#SUPREME @SlickBlocka]

3. Procedural Timeline
The trades in question occurred on July 2026, and I submitted my formal payout request on August 6, 2026.
My account remained active with no real-time breach notifications or automated system warnings during live market trading. @QtFunded

[#SUPREME @SlickBlocka]

Conservative Risk Management: Trading a consistent 1.00 Lot on a $50,000 account represents standard, low-leverage exposure. @QtFunded

[#SUPREME @SlickBlocka]

Standard Holding Durations: My trades were held over realistic market timeframes (ranging from over 40 minutes to multiple hours on July 23–24). This reflects standard manual intraday price-action trading, not high-frequency trading, tick scalping, or latency arbitrage. @QtFunded

[#SUPREME @SlickBlocka]

2. Full Compliance with Account & Trading Rules
No Simultaneous Open Positions: Every trade was managed sequentially. A full or partial exit cycle was completed before any new market entry was initiated. @QtFunded