Schlimp

one day at a time

[狂樹@ゲーマー・インフェルノ @kuruuki]

海外遊戯王の大量禁止の背景、ちょいと調べたら結構深刻やね
・前回の改訂でロタリー禁止でキラチェは殺したけど他デッキの規制が緩すぎた
・そもそも競技人口が馬鹿ほど減ってる。参加者が半分以上減ってるところも
・それらに対してユーザーの不満が爆発中

[Liz Churchill @liz_churchill10]

Terrible

[General Mike Flynn @GenFlynn]

@Fmari0n Dirt before degrees.

[Schlimp @Slimp999]

@RolleRukus @khaliltooshort Every episode is dick everytime. Literally and metaphorically

[Schlimp @Slimp999]

@Thefusionistygo Should’ve ashed first play

[Schlimp @Slimp999]

@Yuvyan_Malhan @AlmondTheSyrian Science can’t even prove itself, along with all other immaterial things in the universe like love, numbers, consciousness, and etc.

[Schlimp @Slimp999]

@TheTacoKing2 @mirrormaster900 Yes, that may be fallacy but he’s pointing farfas inconsistency

[Schlimp @Slimp999]

It’s very complex but I think it should be more of a stakeholder voting. If you have meat in the game or “x” requirements, something like land or business while also passing a civics exam you should then be able to vote. This would weed out most idiots, illegals, women, and low T men that ruin our country with their decisions.

[Schlimp @Slimp999]

@KateSabers01 @TemplarsVoice I agree but I have a justification for that claim. Do you?

[Schlimp @Slimp999]

@hasioorr @fireisice2 @TemplarsVoice He’s running himself in circles bc he’s caught in a logic trap and doesn’t even realize it.

[Schlimp @Slimp999]

@JingoJungleNL @TemplarsVoice Back to your earlier points, how do you prove your moral relativity ?

[Schlimp @Slimp999]

@JingoJungleNL @TemplarsVoice So with your position you don’t accept there is absolute truth ?

[Schlimp @Slimp999]

@Aiism_Priest Your logic is absolutely blowing my mind rn

[Schlimp @Slimp999]

@Aiism_Priest Nihilism broke your brain. Sorry bud

[Schlimp @Slimp999]

@JingoJungleNL @TemplarsVoice So your entire worldview boils down to we all have preferences and everything is permissible and nothing is good nor evil?

[Schlimp @Slimp999]

@fireisice2 @TemplarsVoice Statement A cannot both be true and not true at the same time. That’s incoherent. This is basic philosophy

[Schlimp @Slimp999]

It’s a hypothetical to reduce your logic and point inconsistencies. We could use other time periods as well that condoned slavery, rape, killing and stealing. In your worldview it doesn’t matter anyway bc everything can be good if the masses agree on it right? Or morality can just shift and decide rape is okay and you would have to just accept it.

[Schlimp @Slimp999]

@fireisice2 @TemplarsVoice Another Logical leap. Why doesn’t morality have a fixed point? Why does morality need to shift? You’re just asserting things

[Schlimp @Slimp999]

@JingoJungleNL @TemplarsVoice So your counter position is that rape can be good or bad depending on the situation and it still makes sense for an orderly world?

[Schlimp @Slimp999]

It’s not a logical leap, it’s logical consistency. Statement A about murder being good cannot both be true and false at the same time. That violates the law of non-contradiction. Also, collective consensus cannot make the moral standard. The collective consensus in Germany decided it was good to murder Jews, so I guess genocide was truly good for them. Collective Consensus is also subjective., so you saying “truly” this and that is actually not “truly”. Seems like you’re making some serious incoherent logical leaps.