Indonesia & Malaysia declared Malacca 'not an international strait' in 1971 and it took decades to bury. Legitimise one toll and every littoral reopens the file. 80% of China's oil transits Malacca.
Would've expected the US to be prepared for the response and haven't seen evidence of a high number of impacts. That being said, if US soldiers have died it's going to be limit long $BNO
BREAKING: Iran's IRGC announces it struck the US Marine Camp Titin base in Jordan with a heavy barrage of ballistic missiles, killing "a large number of American forces" and destroying "several important facilities and enemy attack helicopters," per Tasnim.
The IRGC says the retaliation is for a US strike on a residential home in Sirik that hit a wedding ceremony, killing and injuring nearly 50 Iranian civilians including a child.
The historical precedent for sustaining near-zero ERPs in a tightening cycle is poor. For the ERP to mean-revert even modestly toward its post-GFC average of ~3.5–4%, either the 10-year yield needs to fall significantly, or equity prices need to decline materially.
S&P 500 forward earnings yield sits at 5.16% against a 10-year Treasury yield of 4.80% leaving an equity risk premium of just 36 basis points. Premium has averaged well above 300bps over the past decade. $SPY is not discounting a sustained inflation/tightening cycle
During the dot-com era, negative ERPs existed in a world of falling inflation and a Fed that was broadly accommodative. Today, the ERP is near zero with the Fed actively hiking, oil at $90/bbl, and geopolitical risk elevated.
No one on the FOMC will say this explicitly, but there will be no stopping the momentum toward a hike if oil remains this high going into the September meeting.
Dec oil <$1 from new highs.
If oil is this high, there is no realistic CPI/PPI/NFP number that will stop a hike.
Unpopular opinion, Trump only consistent feature is that he cares about markets more than his own children. He also loves a deal. He won't cause a sovereign debt crisis over Iran. That being said, it's always darkest before dawn and I'm not sure the suns on the horizon.
A U.S. official said the plan is intended to reduce the risk of Iranian attacks on oil tankers, U.S. Navy ships and Air Force aircraft, describing the approach as “mowing the lawn.” - Axios
If this isn't a negotiating tactic this is thesis invalidation. US struck Iran because it was trying to mine the strait, Iran returned fire and caused limited damage. Unless the claim of limited damage is understated, I don't see why Trump moves up the escalation ladder here
Indonesia & Malaysia declared Malacca 'not an international strait' in 1971 and it took decades to bury. Legitimise one toll and every littoral reopens the file. 80% of China's oil transits Malacca.
At the May Beijing summit Xi explicitly opposed any attempt to charge for the Strait of Hormuz's use. The ramifications for the Taiwan Strait, South China Sea, Strait of Malacca etc are significant
Surprised this point doesn't come up more often. Whilst US military capacity degrading is in China's favour, a prolonged conflict further strains and already weak Chinese economy. That being said, China won't be dictated to on sanctions.
The current unquantifiable is what Iran wants. We know the US want a deal. We know the political establishment (eg Pezeshkian) want a deal. But what do the hardliners want?
A) They accept they cannot achieve total victory and are escalating for leverage to restart talks
B) They still believe they can win by outlasting the US and their demands are so egregious they are an ultimatum designed to be rejected
All hinges on how bad Iran are hurting.
Surprised this point doesn't come up more often. Whilst US military capacity degrading is in China's favour, a prolonged conflict further strains and already weak Chinese economy. That being said, China won't be dictated to on sanctions.