@stockdogg34@MemeDitka I’m not even conspiracy theorizing that the amount of people is wrong, assume it’s right, just confused why that info is the only secret. Also think with a lock Thursday morning, dono why they don’t release each players win amount early on so you know what you’re rooting on
@MemeDitka Impressively close, thanks. do you find it strange that Draftkings will give exact amounts for every player except rai or smalley and just say they were close to same, can’t think of a reason and it’s made me more curious
@DK_Assist@tigerflappy Why not put what exact amounts for the 2 winners are when you’ll do it for everyone else, seems intentional and I’m curious the reason
@CFBGarrett@JoeDellera Baseline numbers, but still squeaking out value on larger free bets that you don’t get often and minimizing your chance to capitalize isn’t worth a strong take in critiquing Dana’s use, esp when it now has $9,200 value post use.
@CFBGarrett@JoeDellera Take it to polarized odds
$10,000 bets
-10,000 odds. Win $100 let’s say 100%. Worth $100
-110, win ~$9,100 50% of time. $4,550 value
+300, win $30,000 20% of time and it should be a little higher, $6,000 value
@UsedGolfFacts@StevenCheah@Glenny_balls This makes a lot of sense and I think you might be right, as he specifically said not your moms, math might be mathing after all
@SportsCardsDrct@Glenny_balls I don’t know, it’s an incredible trick, just saying there are no possible numbers you can input via his directive(unless glenny thinks 33/25 is a date which I guess is possible) that would equal 9987.
@StevenCheah@Glenny_balls The math doesn’t math Steven, 9987 only divisible by 1 and 3 and 3329/9987 is impossible to get to using the math he suggested
@ClubCamCole@DraftKings I lost like 3 entries on Brendan Todd last year so I would’ve preferred not that being a thing in early rounds, your path seems better