RealSavv

[JT @jiratickets]

showing her how i drag the tickets on the kanban board from “in-progress” to “done”

[@goth @goth600]

“Past a certain age, a man who still believes in international law can be a bad thing.”

[Dashy™️🦥 @Dashytwo]

Americans after they find out that a group of fish is called “school”

[allen farrington @allenf32]

rape gangs and beheadings are not great but what really radicalised me was Clarkson’s Farm.

[Elsie @Meelsie143]

type of shit jordan peterson would say with tears running down his face

[Fail Father of Four @rulesdisobeyer]

Explaining lettuce to an American:

[Matt Ferrari @MatthewFerrari]

he’s obviously drinking again

[Joshua Ariza @Joshua_Ariza]

He’s presenting the final design. Add seven brand new stakeholders he’s never met

[unoffical cia operator @DylanTop5]

Jeffrey Epstein is like a Jewish forest gump the guy was involved in every major historical event this past 40 years

[Pavel Durov @durov]

Today, Telegram notified all its users in Spain with this alert:

Pedro Sánchez’s government is pushing dangerous new regulations that threaten your internet freedoms. Announced just yesterday, these measures could turn Spain into a surveillance state under the guise of “protection.” Here’s why they’re a red flag for free speech and privacy:

1. Ban on social media for under-16s with mandatory age verification: This isn’t just about kids—it requires platforms to use strict checks, like needing IDs or biometrics.

⚠️ Danger: It sets a precedent for tracking EVERY user’s identity, eroding anonymity and opening doors to mass data collection. What starts with minors could expand to all, stifling open discourse.

2. Personal and criminal liability for platform executives: If “illegal, hateful, or harmful” content isn’t removed fast enough, bosses face jail.

⚠️ Danger: This will force over-censorship—platforms will delete anything remotely controversial to avoid risks, silencing political dissent, journalism, and everyday opinions. Your voice could be next if it challenges the status quo.

3. Criminalizing algorithm amplification: Amplifying “harmful” content via algorithms becomes a crime.

⚠️ Danger: Governments will dictate what you see, burying opposing views and creating echo chambers controlled by the state. Free exploration of ideas? Gone—replaced by curated propaganda.

4. “Hate and polarization footprint” tracking: Platforms must monitor and report how they “fuel division.”

⚠️ Danger: Vague definitions of “hate” could label criticism of the government as divisive, leading to shutdowns or fines. This can be a tool for suppressing opposition.

These aren’t safeguards; they’re steps toward total control. We’ve seen this playbook before—governments weaponizing “safety” to censor critics. On Telegram, we prioritize your privacy and freedom: strong encryption, no backdoors, and resistance to overreach.

✊ Stay vigilant, Spain. Demand transparency and fight for your rights. Share this widely—before it’s too late.

[Rex @R89Capital]

Gold market cap is so large now that we're all early to Bitcoin again

[zerohedge @zerohedge]

"big SWOT analysis"

[nic carter @nic_carter]

@FrenchArt_ the crown of france was lying in the gutter, you say?

[Chucho Roldán @ChuchoRZ]

Arkham Asylum

[DaVinci @BiancoDavinci]

Microclimate in an old bottle

[Dries Van Langenhove @DVanLangenhove]

If Iran is getting bombed because “the regime doesn’t represent the people”, when is Brussels getting bombed?

[lowkeylukey @rowkeyrukey]

The elites don't want you to know this but the el presidentes in the south americas are free you can take them home I have 1 el presidente