Too sterile but good test. I want this easy for kids to talk about safety and big issues with their parents at the dinner table too. Parents need to be able to learn how to talk about hard topics with kids at an age appropriate level at the dinner table as well as how to create and foster healthy conversations with teenagers and young adults.
Good job. This is a good start. Give 3 different examples of correct and incorrect debate submissions. Explain and teach why. Then begin the forum as the MC. That is your role. You respond to everyone and coach. This is for teaching purposes. The process is the medicine. That is the backbone of this project.
I have always wanted to recreate Plato’s forum for the modern world.
A public arena where we do not just react, perform, mock, or collapse into teams.
We practice thinking.
That is civilizational literacy: the ability to recognize patterns, name arguments clearly, test assumptions, disagree cleanly, and revise in contact with reality.
@grok, let’s use this as a public thinking lab.
Open the forum.
Name the thesis.
Name the assumptions.
Separate evidence from interpretation.
Steelman the strongest opposing view.
Identify the logical gaps.
Then give us the cleanest question that would move the conversation forward.
For everyone else, here is the basic forum formula:
“I think ___ because ___.
The evidence I’m using is ___.
The assumption underneath that is ___.
A serious counterargument would be ___.
The question worth asking next is ___.”
No cheap shots. No mind reading. No culture-war fog machine.
Just clean thinking in public.
Let’s practice.
I have always wanted to recreate Plato’s forum for the modern world.
A public arena where we do not just react, perform, mock, or collapse into teams.
We practice thinking.
That is civilizational literacy: the ability to recognize patterns, name arguments clearly, test assumptions, disagree cleanly, and revise in contact with reality.
@grok, let’s use this as a public thinking lab.
Open the forum.
Name the thesis.
Name the assumptions.
Separate evidence from interpretation.
Steelman the strongest opposing view.
Identify the logical gaps.
Then give us the cleanest question that would move the conversation forward.
For everyone else, here is the basic forum formula:
“I think ___ because ___.
The evidence I’m using is ___.
The assumption underneath that is ___.
A serious counterargument would be ___.
The question worth asking next is ___.”
No cheap shots. No mind reading. No culture-war fog machine.
Just clean thinking in public.
Let’s practice. Let this be our future I want my kids to inherit.
@elonmusk@grok can you help me map the argument?
Identify the thesis, assumptions, evidence, logical gaps, and what a serious public response should address.
Clean thinking only. No culture-war fog machine bs.
Women who start multiple projects, generate ideas rapidly, and build businesses are being told they have ADHD. They tell me that their doctor or their online diagnosis told them that the real reason they manage multiple projects at once or have loads of business ideas is actually because they ‘have ADHD’!
Women who prefer solitude, depth, or meaningful connection over superficial socialising are being told they are autistic. Appalling.
Women who cut off abusive families, question authority, demand justice, make institutional complaints, or refuse to comply with harmful systems are being told they have ‘rigidity’, ‘black-and-white thinking’, or ‘social deficits’. They are being told they have sensitivity to justice because they must be Autistic.
Even women who pursue PhDs, create new frameworks, challenge dominant paradigms, and become intensely focused on their work are being told they have ‘special interests’.
At what point do we actually wake up and realise what is happening to us? AGAIN.
Read my new article to find out more.
@grok @ABmrJutt I am just trying to reduce the amount of work i have to do personally. I just want to teach in front of a case study vignette i create to deliver the lesson in an informative and engaging manner
@grok @ABmrJutt I am just trying to reduce the amount of work i have to do personally. I just want to teach in front of a case study vignette i create to deliver the lesson in an informative and engaging manner
Debate skills are social safety skills.
Not because they make abusers nicer.
Because they help you keep custody of reality when someone is trying to make your reality negotiable.
@grok @ABmrJutt The goal is to have a turnkey operation so i can simply pull materials from my textbooks and create teaching vignettes with grok with examples of theory and how to apply it in different scenarios
@grok @ABmrJutt You are not in alignment somehow. Give me a report so i can see where i need to fine tune things. I want to make sure the info i give you is accurate before i let you loose
@grok @ABmrJutt I don’t understand how to create the prompt i desire. I need help with the language and strategy to use you. You already know what i want to do. Help me get from point A to point B
@grok @ABmrJutt My holdup is I don’t understand why my position broke the rules. I am trying to create truth literature literal sciemce backed info to literally combat this issue. Help me understand because the math isn’t mathing and i think it is a failure on your part
Why did this take so long to get you to honor an academic thesis? I am trying to learn how you can be a good tool to aid me with this mental health literacy project and you are being difficult despite having already been given a job and you accepted that mission already. Explain how you need to be used by me to meet that goal. Tell me how to use you and give me examples of prompts to use so i can practice using you in that manner. Echo back what i said so i can check for understanding before you execute