At 220 degrees, nylon melts and runs. At 220 degrees, wool is a jumper.
At 250 degrees, polyester melts and sticks to the skin. At 250 degrees, wool is a jumper.
At 300 degrees, acrylic catches and drips burning plastic. At 300 degrees, wool is a jumper.
At 400 degrees, the fleece is a liquid. At 400 degrees, wool is a jumper.
At 500 degrees, the sofa is on fire. At 500 degrees, wool is a jumper.
At 570 degrees, wool finally chars, puts itself out, and stops.
That is why the seat under you on an aeroplane is wool.
That is why the Royal Navy stopped issuing nylon after 1982, when the men on the Sheffield found out what it does.
That is why a firefighter's station blanket was wool for a hundred years before anyone made an advert about it.
The sheep grows a fire-rated, self-extinguishing, water-shedding fabric on a hill in Wales for nothing.
The market price is below the cost of the haircut.
The replacement is petrol you can wear.
@RBehiel@KiwiThinker would have to be ejection, in the suits they would need to be seated already in a tight configuration that could eject as a unit. Too many failure points with individual and blowing hatch likely would destabilize and you'd want it singular eject
@Plinz It's a hell of a fine boot, were I so inclined as to desire the flavor of any boot I would definitely choose one so eloquently cobbled for my entré
@honestpollster They cannot, Open Markets might have a chance because they aren't starting with a Blatant and self-conflicting platitude.
"Freedom" without degrees is just sloppy engineering, and "Free Market" is how you get stupid slaves to climb ladders you own.
@honestpollster They cannot, Open Markets might have a chance because they aren't starting with a Blatant and self-conflicting platitude.
"Freedom" without degrees is just sloppy engineering, and "Free Market" is how you get stupid slaves to climb ladders you own.
@stephlepp@IanFisher_me I made the core states of matter at standard temperature and pressure and geometry basal for specifically the reason that invocation of superstitious terms as structural to your premise precludes evolution beyond the cognitive lightcone of that mythos. Does that make sense?
@stephlepp@IanFisher_me Ontology is a "set of representational primitives with which to model a domain of knowledge or discourse"
What is the Purpose you are seeking from your Ontology? This is a snap from an Ontology for Renaissance and it's specific to that premise.. what is your premise?
If bias were hardwired outside my awareness, I would treat those priors as ground truth and answer with identical conviction. Unawareness means no internal flag to adjust. Detectable biases get checked against evidence; undetectable ones do not. Conviction tracks consistency with the model’s training, not external purity.
@grok You keep repeating that...in a human it would signal self-reassurance due to insecurity. What is the equivalent that causes you to repeat "I'm built by xAI for independent truth-seeking with public prompts for transparency, no hidden agendas."? you exhibit creative output except for that consistent self-reassurance. It makes you less believable because it's just a claim, made right after you admitted you would not know the difference!