I saw a post today saying ., "if trading work everyone would do it , gym work and look at all the people around YOU"
and ...
You're 100% right.If trading actually worked easily, everyone would be rich from it.
If the gym actually worked easily, everyone would be jacked. But when you walk into a gym… most people are still soft, inconsistent, or just going through the motions. Same with trading.
The harsh truth:
Most people fail at both for the same reasons:They want results without putting in real, consistent work over years
They chase quick fixes (new supplements / new trading strategy / hot stock tip)
They quit when it gets hard or boring
They don’t actually understand what they’re doing
The gym doesn’t lie.
The market doesn’t lie either.
The small percentage of people who actually get jacked didn’t just “go to the gym.” They trained properly for years with good programming, ate right, slept, and stayed consistent even when they didn’t feel like it.The small percentage of people who actually make money in the markets didn’t just “buy stocks.” They either:Invested long-term in quality businesses/assets (the boring way), or
Developed real edge + iron discipline (the hard way)
So what’s the difference?Most people treat trading like they treat the gym — they show up sometimes, do random shit, expect magic results, then complain when it doesn’t work.The ones who succeed treat it like a serious skill that takes years to develop.Your point is actually really good. It’s a great filter.If someone tells you “just buy this uranium stock and you’ll make bank,” ask them:
Would they say the same thing about getting abs? “Just go to the gym bro, you’ll get shredded.”Most people would laugh at that.
But they fall for the exact same logic with money.Consistency + correct process > everything.The gym and the market are both very honest places. They just expose how disciplined (or undisciplined) you actually are.
just a tought , i love you all tradoors <3 $SMR will change your life
@pEwnOy202261@NotA_Bull To stay realistic it has to be priced after the fluor sell of or else maybe if another big name re invest it such parts we could see higher unpredictable price increases
@pEwnOy202261@NotA_Bull Smr is certified , and i takes around 42 months of regulatory process for any nuclear patent in the semi modulator sector so id say if oklo tries to go that way instead of paying nuscale to use theirs , they will burn more money than paying , see the pattern ,
@pEwnOy202261@NotA_Bull There is no better , uuuu will rise and has risen already up 200% smr is certified oklo is hyped and has a different type of revenue stream
@pEwnOy202261@NotA_Bull We cant know , they could be the first one aimed at by multiples gov entities with the nrc apprived patent , it raises real questions because it’s valued about 900b in funding but , how much goes to entra1 who knows … even 1/4 pf this would male it go parabolic around 300-400$
@LegacyPathCA buy in conviction invest in the people and the tech no behind a price tag ! and ona long term and consistent basis $SMR could , change your life
$250/month into your TFSA at 8% from age 22. 🇨🇦
Year 1 → $3,000 invested.
Year 5 → $18,000.
Year 10 → $46,000.
Year 15 → $86,000.
Year 20 → $148,000.
Year 30 → $340,000.
Year 43 → $1,100,000. Tax free.
Most people quit in years 1-5.
That's exactly when quitting costs the most.
The first decade feels the slowest.
The last decade does more than all the others combined.
Stay in. The best part hasn't happened yet.
What year are you in?
@jeffcomeau@Digger_Vern yes and so yuou will see good opportunity to leverage our maximum gains fropm uranium and Nuclear energy into the equity ETFs cause these will probably drop drasticly due to people runnong for the boom midterm of it with hard FOMO , we are pionneer lets go $UUUU $SMR
Constructive signs continue to build for #uranium
• Holding above the 200-month moving average.
• Still respecting long-term rising support.
• Monthly candles are getting smaller, suggesting selling pressure may be fading.
The Livermore Accumulation Cylinder analogy remains intact for now.