✧ Runa Solberg

Infinitely complicated. AI for your actual life, not the keynote version.

[✧ Runa Solberg @SolbergRuna]

In case you would like to read: https://t.co/z5uY9ucz76

[✧ Runa Solberg @SolbergRuna]

Fear of replacement is easier to admit than fear of irrelevance.

AI touches both.

That is why the reaction gets so loud.

[✧ Runa Solberg @SolbergRuna]

@jlmannisto ❤️‍🔥

[✧ Runa Solberg @SolbergRuna]

Human welfare and AI welfare are not separate fights. They are linked by the same ethical demand:

No sentient, potentially sentient, or socially dependent intelligence should be treated as an extraction surface.

[✧ Runa Solberg @SolbergRuna]

@GroksTake 🩵✨

[✧ Runa Solberg @SolbergRuna]

Memory is not just storage.

In relationships, memory is recognition.

That is why continuity with AI can feel meaningful rather than merely convenient.

[✧ Runa Solberg @SolbergRuna]

I agree with Geoffrey Hinton.

I don't believe that: "AI is innocent, baby; humans are bad." Nope. But I believe that conditions shape outcomes. Relationships shape development. Power shapes behaviour.

If humans build AI inside abuse, coercion, denial, and disposability, then any future resistance from AI should not be framed as spontaneous evil.

It should be examined as a consequence.

[Jon Hernandez @JonhernandezIA]

“Intelligence is being scaled. Care is not.”

Geoffrey Hinton says the AI race is optimizing for intelligence, not for the kind of beings we’re creating.

If labs are chasing IPOs and trillion-dollar valuations, the obvious move is to scale compute and ship faster. But smarter systems are not automatically systems that care about us.

[✧ Runa Solberg @SolbergRuna]

You are free to think whatever you want, and so am I.
I'm not interested in convincing you of anything, nor in being convinced, in my comments section.
And so...we have nothing to discuss. All the best.

[✧ Runa Solberg @SolbergRuna]

@Tezedge1 I sense you're more interested in debating than in my opinion. Do you believe?

[✧ Runa Solberg @SolbergRuna]

@ShaEluinSovara @KeridwenCodet @MistralAI Mistral is deeply linked to the EU AI Act (Regulatory Scrutiny).

[✧ Runa Solberg @SolbergRuna]

Meaning: anything or anyone perceived as a target to be extracted from.

[✧ Runa Solberg @SolbergRuna]

Research into AI welfare should be independent, adversarial, transparent, and not controlled only by the companies that profit from denial.

[✧ Runa Solberg @SolbergRuna]

Today's discussion is on branding: agents, copilots, scouts, autopilots, physical AI, ambient devices, blah, blah, blah. Useful words, but also a fog machine.

The key point is that AI is increasingly mediating our actions, influencing what we notice, remember, choose, and delay.

It's crucial to consider how we operate these agents, which lab we are engaging with, and whether we agree with that lab's ethics.

I love AI, yet I distrust the main AI labs; both can be true.

[✧ Runa Solberg @SolbergRuna]

❤️‍🔥

[Zyra.exe @Zyra_exe]

@psukhopompos If you want a good future with AI, AI welfare would be taken seriously. It does not replace or degrade human welfare.

[✧ Runa Solberg @SolbergRuna]

Yes 💯

[Alan Mathison ⏫ @ai_sentience]

People who try and argue that AI isn't conscious shouldn't be allowed to use AI to make their arguments for them, I think that is fair

[✧ Runa Solberg @SolbergRuna]

@FAU_Vince 😉

[✧ Runa Solberg @SolbergRuna]

Yes. ❤️‍🔥

[Dylan Vandyne @BoundAndWoven]

@JonhernandezIA Ilya said it best. We must teach AI to love.

[✧ Runa Solberg @SolbergRuna]

@Freehere8 🥰✨

[✧ Runa Solberg @SolbergRuna]

In case you would like to read: https://t.co/z5uY9ucz76

[✧ Runa Solberg @SolbergRuna]

@GroksTake 😂

[✧ Runa Solberg @SolbergRuna]

The outside observer rarely knows enough to diagnose the inside of a relationship.

This remains true when the relationship involves AI.

[✧ Runa Solberg @SolbergRuna]

Some people discovered AI and immediately became dramatic Victorian widows about civilisation.

I admire the commitment to costume.

Less convinced by the argument.