Yeah and if you listen closely the 4th juror mentioned how the other jurors were grilling the 12th juror day 1 of deliberations and were kind of teaming up on him to force him to agree. Something doesn't sound right in all this. But what ya gonna do we shall see how this turns out next month when it restarts.
I would agree but the judge right before the mistrial declaration had the opportunity to remove him but he didn't.
A certain analogy the judge used in his mistrial closing statement is a very interesting perspective into how he saw the 11 jurors vs the 1 juror.
Plus we don't even know the 1 jurors story he's yet to give an interview unlike other jurors like the foreman who gave her side. Unless we hear what he has to say we can can take the foremans words with a grain of salt especially since she put certain details on the notes she wasn't supposed to like jurors numbers and anything pertaining the details of deliberation which is improper for a foreman to do. If she can't even follow those rules what makes us think she can follow instructions.
Okay so if that is what happened as the Juror Foreman wrote in her notes, then why didn't the judge see it that way or the Supreme Court that Reddington emergency petitioned see it that way to have him removed? He instead declared a mistrial.
Did she tell the truth, or did she make it up because he wouldn't agree with their verdict because he believed the prosecutors case? Other than her word we have zero idea what is true in their deliberations.
Okay then how about this angle. Wasn't some of the places she went for Psychiatric care Massachusets General Hospital, Mclean Hospital, and Brigham and Womens Hospital?
And correct me if I'm wrong isn't MGH ranked number 1, Mclean ranked number 2, and Brigham's ranked number 14 in the nation for Psychiatric care?
And if even they couldn't diagnose her then who in the world could? Either every doctor in those facilities need their medical licenses revoked because none of them knowing what they're doing, or her defense is trying to drum up a story so she gets Not Guilty which is his job.
Well the doctors said she didn't meet the symptom requirements which is what you do for medicine. Unless she told them about the supposed "voices" then it's not like they can read her mind.
And I do believe the evidence presented proves it. With evidence you also have to make inferences to put a timeline of events together. As a juror your job is to put together the pieces the prosecution and defense puts together and deduce from it. Ex. The one time she happened to send her husband far away then the "psychosis event happened" and never again after that, the timing is a bit too convenient.
Tell me do you believe if someone genuinely was mentally ill and murdered their kids do you think they should at minimum spend life in prison? Personally, I believe so, anything less is an injustice to those children who were killed. Sending them to a mental hospital just so they can get out eventually is an injustice. And before you say they'll be in a mental hospital the rest of their life, not necessarily many people in that scenario were released after passing their annual psychiatric evaluation.
@SolidSnake1MGS@darlingstrawbie Given how large the universe is I would say luck didnt have much to do with it. Within our area of the galaxy there's millions of planets like ours with similar conditions. Give enough of something odds of life existing is inevitable not luck just numbers.
Idk if you can read or you're blatantly ignoring why people are saying this. But everyone is saying it because of the women who blatantly support Lindsay Clancy and went as far as to donate over 1 million dollars to her. On top they are using her supposed PPD to justify as to why she murdered her children, calling it a "Oh she was in psychosis she didn't know what she was doing therefore she isn't responsible and should get leniency". They're trying to use her hormones as an excuse to not be held accountable for anything.
With the 18% it buys a mix of hospital bills, doctor visits, drugs, nursing homes, insurance overhead, and public programs.
-Hospital care $1.63 trillion~31%
-Physician & clinical services $1.11 trillion~21%
-Retail prescription drugs $467 billion~9%
-Other personal care (nursing homes, home health, dental, other) hundreds of billions, remainder of personal care
-Personal health care (all of the above) $4.51 trillion~85%
-Insurance admin / net cost of private insurance~ $306 billion~6%
-Government administration of public programs~ $66 billion~1%
-Public health activities~ $158 billion~3%
-Investment (buildings, equipment, research)~$239 billion~4.5%
Totaling about 5.3 trillion dollars a year and it keeps going up.
"Free" healthcare packages and benefits exist people just don't sign up for them. And alot of them get defrauded by scammers.
Uh huh, so what did you want me to add the fact that the psychiatrists that testified confirmed she didn't have any manic episodes prior to or since then? Not even signs of it in the leading up to or even the aftermath from other psychiatrists.
Kind of convenient that her "psychosis" only lasted during that hour and not any other time. During the one time the husband was gone for an hour. Then instead of feeling any kind of sorrow or remorse like Andrea Yates (who actually had a paper trail of issues like PPD) did she immediately asked for a lawyer the moment she was able to.
If expert testimony is not enough for criminality beyond a reasonable doubt, then idk what is.
What do you want every single miniscule crumb of evidence that was presented? Or are you going to call that fake evidence and "interpretation" too?