Today the US Supreme Court justices are in conference and will decide if they will hear my case against Democrats in the Colorado Legislature who silenced me for not using preferred names and pronouns. Pray they do!
@MorrellMDmph Even still, be it known unto thee, o king, that I will not serve thy gods nor worship thy golden image which thou hast set up.
If it be so, that my God whom I serve, is able to deliver me from the burning, fiery furnace, and will deliver me out of thine hand, o king.
@RenStatesman@jeffhunt Why do you think Lopez left? The party is an absolute dumpster fire.
They are good for one thing: getting a candidate on the ballot.
Then they throw you to the wolves.
Lopez clearly saw that and said if I’m not going to have their support why should I carry around their trash?
For people like @pweiser claiming that initiative 134 needs to go through legislative review; let me explain that it already did.
The original language is below.
I then took that language and turned it into a citizen’s initiative. That power is found in the state constitution before the power of the legislature.
It was presented to the Office of
Legislative Legal Services who review it and type it up into statute by style language.
It then goes before the title board where it is dissected and scrutinized and determine if it meets single-subject requirements.
Only then will title be given. Anyone can appeal those decisions.
They did. Repeatedly.
It went all the way to the Colorado Supreme Court where I won.
I then was able to circulate petitions to place it onto the ballot.
We succeeded.
We then put it before the voters, and even in a majority blue state, the voters said yes to this measure.
https://t.co/5U6NYrEf47
HR asked us to build an internal AI chatbot that could answer employee questions about company policies.
We connected it to the employee handbook, benefits documents, and twelve years of internal company announcements.
Named it AskHR.
It worked beautifully.
Employees could ask about PTO, health insurance, parental leave, whatever.
Then someone asked:
"Why haven't we received raises in two years?"
The chatbot responded:
"According to the CFO's March 2025 announcement, the company is experiencing financial constraints."
Then it helpfully added:
"However, the company approved $340,000 in executive bonuses during the same period."
HR called me immediately.
"WHY IS IT SAYING THAT?"
I explained that both announcements were in its knowledge base.
They asked me to remove the bonus information.
I asked if it was inaccurate.
"No, but it's inappropriate."
Then someone asked AskHR why the company stopped providing free lunches.
It explained the decision was made to reduce operating expenses.
Then cited a leadership announcement celebrating our new $180,000 executive retreat.
Employees started asking questions we'd never anticipated.
"Why does the CEO have a company car?"
"Who approved the private jet expense?"
"Why was the employee wellness budget cut?"
AskHR answered every single one.
With sources.
By Thursday, HR had received 200 complaints.
Not about the chatbot.
About the company.
The CEO demanded we shut it down.
Said the system was spreading negativity.
I explained that it was literally repeating information leadership had published themselves.
He said we needed to make it more aligned with company values.
I asked which values.
He said he'd get back to me.
We spent $140,000 building an AI that could accurately explain company policies.
It lasted four days.
Turns out the one thing leadership didn't want employees having access to was leadership's own decisions.
@TheAdvocateMag The irony that she’s cornered she doesn’t understand the voters, and the polling consistently show a majority of even democrats don’t support the trans agenda.
She is the master of spin.
Today, while attending a great Veterans Day event and flag retreat at @Disneyland, I got to meet Jill Estorino. I look forward to cresting magic with her at the happiest place on earth!
For people like @pweiser claiming that initiative 134 needs to go through legislative review; let me explain that it already did.
The original language is below.
I then took that language and turned it into a citizen’s initiative. That power is found in the state constitution before the power of the legislature.
It was presented to the Office of
Legislative Legal Services who review it and type it up into statute by style language.
It then goes before the title board where it is dissected and scrutinized and determine if it meets single-subject requirements.
Only then will title be given. Anyone can appeal those decisions.
They did. Repeatedly.
It went all the way to the Colorado Supreme Court where I won.
I then was able to circulate petitions to place it onto the ballot.
We succeeded.
We then put it before the voters, and even in a majority blue state, the voters said yes to this measure.
https://t.co/5U6NYrEf47