Don't want any followers in virtual world any more than I do in physical, if you follow me I will delete you.
I'm just browsing life & keeping up with events...
@Keir_Starmer@EmmanuelMacron These are the filth you've continued flooding our country with, destroy everything.
You're a traitor to Britain, your allegiance is to the Islamification of the west & your family should be ashamed of you.
Another crusade is needed now to fight the dangers of Islam back!
@WarriorSpeech28 Yet if it wasn't for @RupertLowe10 actually getting the Pakistani Rape Gang Enquiry done, no gov would've ever done the enquiry.
They've all known & been complicit for decades yet all stayed silent.
All cities across the UK have had enough of the failed multicultural experiment.
@Keir_Starmer@UKLabour Are we allowed to say we don't want all these small dick pedophile Muslims in our country yet without being called racist?
Other countries can say out loud they don't want immigrants but is western people can't.
https://t.co/ZdYmYrdf2d
@WarriorSpeech28 With the tensions rising, power of the internet & social media, people are seeing the corruption & evil around the world in near real time.
Makes you wonder how word spread all those years ago for them to get the numbers for the crusades, but feels like we need them again.
@grok@BarkingToad@AndrewPorter663@politicalmath If cure for cancer found "again" big pharma companies will just threaten/bribe & commit nefarious "actions" to ensure it doesn't come out
AI will be censored to lie about any cure, just like it's been censored & controlled as to what it says about COVID vax's or climate scam
@TRobinsonNewEra Advice.
As you know they may want to seize phones off you etc, DON'T travel with phone. Let friends take your phones through airports, do not carry them on your person & say you've lost them or had them stolen, just like all MPs phones magically stolen when text investigations!
@narindertweets You are so thick it really does beggar belief sometimes, your deluded posts are sometimes funny to confirm how brainwashed you are, but no critical thinking or common sense over observed in anything you say.
https://t.co/ez6f0GF5kx
"Online safety" laws and age verification mandates have absolutely NOTHING to do with protecting children.
You cannot stop under-16s from accessing a website without checking the age of everyone who visits it. And you cannot check everyone's age without forcing them to prove who they are.
"Child safety" is the cheese in the mousetrap.
Laws sold under the banner of "child protection" constitute a Trojan horse for a system requiring every adult to verify their identity before they can speak, read, or post online. The child is merely an emotional shield. The adult is the real target.
And once that infrastructure exists, the pretext can be swapped out at will.
Today it is pornography, social media and "harmful content". Tomorrow it is messaging apps and online banking. Soon after it is your ability to access the internet at all—each incremental step gated behind a digital ID you are required to keep in good standing.
It's no accident that the exact same "online safety" agenda is being rolled out across the entire Western world simultaneously, with each national government reaching for a slightly different pretext to justify the same outcome—a verified digital identity standing between you and the open internet.
Different countries. Different pretexts. Same infrastructure.
They are not building a system to keep children safe. They are building the identity layer for a permission-based internet—orchestrated from the supranational level by people you never elected—where access to information itself becomes conditional on obedience.
The point is not to make the internet safer. The point is to make anonymous access impossible.
Because a person who can read, speak, organise and dissent anonymously is difficult to control. A person whose most intimate online activity is anchored to a state-monitored digital ID is not.
Once every account, search, post, payment, message and website visit is tied to a verified identity, the internet stops being a public square and becomes a monitored enclosure.
But the gate only closes if people accept "online safety" laws at face value.
"Online safety" laws and age verification mandates have absolutely NOTHING to do with protecting children.
You cannot stop under-16s from accessing a website without checking the age of everyone who visits it. And you cannot check everyone's age without forcing them to prove who they are.
"Child safety" is the cheese in the mousetrap.
Laws sold under the banner of "child protection" constitute a Trojan horse for a system requiring every adult to verify their identity before they can speak, read, or post online. The child is merely an emotional shield. The adult is the real target.
And once that infrastructure exists, the pretext can be swapped out at will.
Today it is pornography, social media and "harmful content". Tomorrow it is messaging apps and online banking. Soon after it is your ability to access the internet at all—each incremental step gated behind a digital ID you are required to keep in good standing.
It's no accident that the exact same "online safety" agenda is being rolled out across the entire Western world simultaneously, with each national government reaching for a slightly different pretext to justify the same outcome—a verified digital identity standing between you and the open internet.
Different countries. Different pretexts. Same infrastructure.
They are not building a system to keep children safe. They are building the identity layer for a permission-based internet—orchestrated from the supranational level by people you never elected—where access to information itself becomes conditional on obedience.
The point is not to make the internet safer. The point is to make anonymous access impossible.
Because a person who can read, speak, organise and dissent anonymously is difficult to control. A person whose most intimate online activity is anchored to a state-monitored digital ID is not.
Once every account, search, post, payment, message and website visit is tied to a verified identity, the internet stops being a public square and becomes a monitored enclosure.
But the gate only closes if people accept "online safety" laws at face value.
@RebeccaHindle_C@ForeverScept VPNs are a legitimate business use for companies needing to connect sites & users across multiple disparate locations for data access.
@LozzaFox Big mouth but little bollocks.
All Muslims have tiny cocks & balls, should go over the road with him & knock him out, or just head butt him in the nose right there!
That's a legitimate threat of violence on camera to your face in your personal space, I'd take the threat out!
@ZackPolanski Fuck off!
You would let us get invaded FASTER than Starmer! by the mentally sick perverted CULT that is Islam!
ILLEGAL INVADERS! Hundreds of thousands of MEN a year come on boats to rape & stab. They want to CONQUER not assimilate.
https://t.co/ZoqTaBsDFN
@AmericaRecharge Fuck off!
He's letting us get invaded FASTER by the mentally sick perverted CULT that is Islam!
ILLEGAL INVADERS! Hundreds of thousands of MEN a year come on boats to rape & stab. They want to CONQUER not assimilate.
https://t.co/ZoqTaBsDFN
@PhilMyers53 Everyone who has been behind Starmer are responsible for the damage he's done & still doing to the UK.
Free speech gone.
Communist direction arresting people for words.
2 tier policing.
Protection of Islam, a fucking religion!
Muslims are issue, but brands Brits as "far right"