Zeek Hektor

Not unified, just more defined.

[Zeek Hektor @Son_Zeek]

Fg without G. Real data. No dimensions, just phase changes.

[Sabine Hossenfelder @skdh]

I can't believe this shit is still going on. By now there must be ten thousands of these nonsense "theories".

[Zeek Hektor @Son_Zeek]

@skdh Interesting! I think the biggest issue of quantum gravity, is that the constant is probably a scalar.

[Zeek Hektor @Son_Zeek]

@kekius9 He always was. He is eternal, outside of time, he doesn't and can't change.

[Zeek Hektor @Son_Zeek]

#calculating #Fg #Forceofgravity without the #constant G #gravitationalconstant through #phase changes in a #rotatinguniverse

[Zeek Hektor @Son_Zeek]

@skdh a rotating universe would "look" like it's expanding from the center, aka us.

[Zeek Hektor @Son_Zeek]

@skdh Do they still think G is a constant and not a scalar?

[Zeek Hektor @Son_Zeek]

@skdh No dimensions, phases.

[Zeek Hektor @Son_Zeek]

@its_The_Dr P!nk wanted more!

[Zeek Hektor @Son_Zeek]

@zyvuzz @grok what song is this?

[Zeek Hektor @Son_Zeek]

@gin_bianconi wtb one more phase change in the demo of T5, 11/11 canceling string theories dimensions accounting for 7 orbital shells, nucleus, collapse, plasma and mass energy conversion.

[Zeek Hektor @Son_Zeek]

@gin_bianconi Fg without G. Gravity as the emergent property of orbital bodies.

[Zeek Hektor @Son_Zeek]

@Andercot he likes crabs too

[Zeek Hektor @Son_Zeek]

@TOEwithCurt orbital bodies only

[Zeek Hektor @Son_Zeek]

@TOEwithCurt You can derive gravity with this, without the scalar constant. Results and variables included. One more phase shift?

[Zeek Hektor @Son_Zeek]

@Samuel_Gregson You just gotta do something crazy, like solve for Fg without that scalar constant for orbital bodies :D

[Zeek Hektor @Son_Zeek]

@PhysicsNirmal @ManishTamta10 what if you solve Fg without G, and the possibility of a rotating universe?

[Zeek Hektor @Son_Zeek]

@mathemetica UPDATED UPDATED

[Zeek Hektor @Son_Zeek]

@mathemetica unless you pull a Erwin Schrödinger and introduce phase shifting!!! off by less than a factor for Fg without G! but i'm missing a phase shift for theta and e!! help! small difference go a long way!

[Zeek Hektor @Son_Zeek]

@skdh What if its random, or deterministic?

[Zeek Hektor @Son_Zeek]

What if its deterministic if it has to be? If light travels in both directions, it can just phase change.

[Sabine Hossenfelder @skdh]

1) Objects in a video game are not truly randomly generated, because they run on conventional computers using non-quantum processes, and non-quantum processes are never truly random. Video game algorithms are pseudo-random. If it were the case that particles in a double slit experiment were indeed generated like in video games (that is, following a deterministic algorithm) that would contradict the current standard interpretation of quantum mechanics.

2) It's not true that measuring an object gives it positional certainty, depends on what you measure. If you measure momentum, then it’s the momentum that obtains certainty, not the position. (Also, you cannot strictly speaking measure anything with certainty.)

3) Regarding the simulation hypothesis. Well, the problem is that absent a proper definition everything is compatible with it. Personally I don't think that's a particularly compelling argument.

https://t.co/GM29O5ulB0

[Zeek Hektor @Son_Zeek]

@martinmbauer how else would you get Fg without the constant? In orbital mechanics to be pacific =P