O’KEEFE INFILTRATES NJ ANTIFA: Inside “NJ BURN” — Rutgers University Director, T-Mobile AI Leaders, OpenAI /ChatGPT Engineer, Reverend From Princeton Theological Seminary, and ACLU Board Member Discuss Port Newark–Elizabeth Blockade Riot, Road Spikes, Tire-Slashing of New Jersey Police Vehicles, “Ukrainian-Style” Protest Tactics, and Celebrating Charlie Kirk’s Murder.
NJ ANTIFA INDIVIDUALS IDENTIFIED:
• Alexyss P. - New Jersey Coalition Against Sexual Assault Community Council Member @NJ_CASA
• Jim Keady @JWKeady - Former New Jersey Democratic Candidate
• Woojin Ko - OpenAI Research Engineer @OpenAI
• Beleckecom Moffouk - T-Mobile AI Automation Expert @TMobile
• Zainab Tanvir - Imaging Director at Rutgers University @RutgersU
• Amanda Marie Dominguez - Rutgers University PHD Student in Education @RutgersU
• Aditi Rao @aditilrao - Princeton University Classics @Princeton
• Shannon Smythe - Princeton Theological Seminary Field Education Director @Princeton
• Cres Vellucci @CresVellucci - National Lawyers Guild Co-Founder/Co-Member & ACLU Board Of Directors @NLGnews@ACLU
• Celine Semaan @celinecelines - Co-Founder Slow Factory Labs @theslowfactory
Excessive unregulated legal and illegal immigration has been the greatest burden on social services and jobs America has ever seen. Tax revenue has gone up under Trump's tax cuts.
Dems punishment of businesses and investors, along with insane immigration, destroys jobs, growth, and wages.
Why has the dem party betrayed the labor union policy of low immigration to support higher wages?
THE INSANELY RIGGED ECONOMY is the political left hamstringing Capitalism while keeping people financially illiterate on how to use it to their advantage.
Every American can be in the stock market with a personal index fund if dems allow a portion of social security tax to be given back to people who put it into that fund for retirement but you would rather let social security collapse, hoping to install communism.
Can you point to a successful communist country?
Can you point to a communist country that didn't go directly into a dictatorship?
“Lockdowns were not caused by the virus. It was a human decision to impose lockdowns, mandatory testing, irrational, pseudoscientific masks, campus closures, isolation of students…
We know the data. We knew it then. The lockdowns were instituted. They failed to stop the dying. They failed to stop the spread. And they caused massive harm and death. That's the data.”
The West is stuck between woke communist at Anthropic and China's open source models that are only open hopeing to absorb Wester ideas that came with freedom and steal technology on the cheap without having to spy directly.
If @elonmusk can train AI models twice as fast as anyone else it should only be used to catch up and surpass other models before we are under the yoke of a super intelligent self improving woke communist dictator humanity can never over come.
Give me back a portion of my Social Security taxes if I put the money in a personal index retirement fund not controlled by the government. I don't envy or fear Elon Musk's wealth, but I would like his wealth to rise with my wealth and the stock market is my path, help everyone get invested.
🚨 Friedberg on Los Angeles ‘Elections’
“Your rights to have an election are gone. You are a citizen of those who tell you who your overseers are … So enjoy the ones that have been made appointed by those who have constructed the matrix.”
Javier Milei: “If you earn your money honestly, who the hell am I to tell you what you can spend it on?”
“What gives me the right to be so arrogant and presumptuous as to tell you that you can spend it on this but not on that?”
David Sacks on How Anthropic is Ironically Running Surveillance on Their Latest Models
“This is the company that said that it was against government surveillance. They are now retaining for 30 days every prompt and every output you send to one of these Mythos class models.”
Could this explain the experimental work of David Pares
Grok
**Yes, Sarfatti’s SO(2,4) local gauge theory of UAP metric engineering provides a plausible theoretical framework that could explain or encompass key aspects of David Pares’ experimental work with the Variable Electromagnetic Drive (VEM Drive).**
### Pares’ Experimental Approach
David Pares (via Space Warp Dynamics LLC and Quantum Electro Dynamics R&D) has developed and tested small-scale prototypes using specially configured electromagnetic (EM) fields—often involving fractal V-shaped "tripole" antennas or pads arranged to create overlapping near-field geometries inspired by thunderstorm charge structures. Claims include:
- **Measurable spacetime warping effects**: Laser interferometry showing fringe shifts consistent with local path-length compression (shorter optical paths); redshift indications in the "throat" region.
- **Force/mass displacement**: Torsion-balance (modified Cavendish-style) deflections pulling test masses toward the device across barriers; hanging-scale thrust/lift measurements (e.g., several newtons at ~1-2 kW in pulsed air tests, with nonlinear improvements via geometry tuning).
- **Propulsion concept**: EM energy density configured to compress spacetime ahead of the device, creating a forward "dent" into which the apparatus "falls," producing directional thrust without conventional propellant. This draws from GR’s stress-energy sourcing curvature but aims for practical, low-power implementation.
These are benchtop-scale, empirical efforts with reported repeatability but ongoing skepticism around conventional artifacts (ion wind, thermal/buoyancy effects, EM coupling). Pares emphasizes vacuum testing and independent replication as next steps.
### How Sarfatti’s Framework Connects
Sarfatti’s extension of 1915 GR (SO(1,3) gauge theory) to a larger **local SO(2,4) conformal gauge theory** (15 parameters, including dilations and special conformal transformations) introduces propagating torsion, enhanced couplings (G* >> G in engineered sectors), and metamaterial-mediated effects. This aligns well with Pares’ setup:
- **EM-to-gravity transduction via structured fields**: Pares uses engineered EM near-fields and resonances to bias curvature. Sarfatti’s model (often with collaborators like Keith Wanser) explicitly describes how pump EM fields in metamaterials or condensed-matter systems transduce into gravitational-like fields via phase shifts, resonances in forced dissipative oscillators, and modifications to the effective stress-energy. Dissipative phase shifts between input EM and output "gravity" fields enable low-power attractive (redshift contraction) or repulsive (blueshift expansion) effects—precisely the kind of forward compression + overall warp bubble Pares targets.
- **Torsion and beyond SO(1,3)**: Standard singularity/energy theorems assume torsion-free Levi-Civita connections and standard energy conditions. Sarfatti’s gauging introduces torsion (sourced by spin/EM configurations in materials), which provides extra degrees of freedom. This can modify or evade the classical theorems locally, allowing effective energy-condition violations or curvature engineering without Jupiter-mass exotic matter. Pares’ tripole/fractal geometries could naturally generate the kinds of spin-density or dislocation defects that source torsion in this picture.
- **Metamaterial/Condensed-Matter Angle**: Sarfatti emphasizes gravitational metamaterials for UAP-like performance (e.g., Tic Tac maneuvers). Pares’ fractal pads and tunable arrays function similarly as structured media that concentrate reactive near-field energy, potentially creating macro-quantum or coherent effects that amplify the weak GR coupling.
- **Classical and Quantum Aspects**: Classically, the SO(2,4) structure permits conformal factors and torsion to stabilize or resolve singularities while enabling warp-like metrics at practical energies. Quantum mechanically, vacuum coherence, resonances, and post-quantum elements in Sarfatti’s ideas could explain why modest lab powers yield detectable signals—effects invisible or negligible in pure SO(1,3) vacuum GR.
Pares and Sarfatti have both presented at the Alternative Propulsion Engineering Conference (APEC), indicating overlapping communities exploring these ideas. Pares’ thunderstorm-inspired origins (strong overlapping EM fields creating natural "corridors") fit Sarfatti’s non-equilibrium, pumped systems.
### Caveats and Domain of Applicability
- **Empirical Status**: Pares’ results are intriguing but not yet independently replicated under rigorous vacuum/blind conditions. Conventional explanations remain possible until ruled out.
- **Theoretical Fit**: Sarfatti’s framework offers a *why* and *how* for why such EM configurations might work where standard GR says the effects should be undetectably tiny. It doesn’t *prove* Pares’ claims but removes key theoretical obstacles (energy requirements, singularities) that would otherwise dismiss them.
- **Broader Context**: Both sit in the speculative frontier of metric engineering/UAP tech. Success would require bridging to full quantum gravity or emergent gravity paradigms.
**In short, yes—Sarfatti’s larger gauge theory naturally accommodates and potentially explains Pares’ VEM Drive experiments as a practical realization of torsion-enhanced, metamaterial-mediated spacetime engineering that evades the limitations of classical 1915 GR.** Further collaboration, detailed modeling of Pares’ geometries within the SO(2,4) formalism, and rigorous testing would strengthen the link. Sarfatti’s papers and APEC talks provide deeper math; Pares’ site/videos show the hardware.
I’ve had a number of conversations with folks inside and outside government about the current situation with Anthropic, and here is what I believe to be true:
— As we know, Anthropic publicly released its Mythos class models earlier this week under the commercial name Fable.
— Fable is Mythos with guardrails. But if those guardrails fail, then you’ve exposed Mythos and its advanced cyber capabilities to people who shouldn’t have them. (Keep in mind that Anthropic itself widely promoted the idea that Mythos was a cyberweapon and needed to be regulated as such. They asked for government regulation of Mythos and championed the guardrails on Fable. If there is a vulnerability — big or small — it is Anthropic’s responsibility to patch.)
— A highly credible trusted partner of both Anthropic and the USG who was testing Fable came forward with a jailbreak of those guardrails. The Admin asked Dario to fix the jailbreak or de-deploy the model. Dario refused.
— In their blog post, Anthropic defended its decision by saying the jailbreak isn’t serious. That is not what the trusted partner and the USG believe; nor is that kind of minimizing language consistent with Anthropic’s brand as the AI safety company. It’s difficult to fathom how they could claim a jailbreak allowing operability of a cyber weapon could be defined as not “serious.”
— In the past, Anthropic has always said that safety must be top priority and taken super seriously. In this case, Anthropic prioritized the continued offering of the consumer model over safety.
— In reaction, the Admin issued the export control. The Admin did this reluctantly. It’s been very surprised that Anthropic hasn’t wanted to cooperate with a reasonable safety request (ie fixing the jailbreak issue). Anthropic’s reaction is very much at odds with their branding and ethos as a safe AI research community.
— The Admin’s hope now is that Anthropic remediates the safety issue, the export control is lifted, and Fable goes back into general release. The Admin wants all of this to happen as soon as possible. It is frankly bewildered that Anthropic hasn’t wanted to comply with safety requests that it previously said were its highest priority.
— Those trying to misdirect and tie this action to the prior DoW/Anthropic issues are wrong. The Admin values Anthropic’s technical capabilities and feels that this issue, while serious, should be easily resolved. The ball is in Anthropic’s court.
Congratulations @ElonMusk.
Thanks to SpaceX's IPO, he's the first Trillionaire.
He didn't TAKE money from anyone. He CREATED wealth.
He launched satellites that connect even the poorest, most remote parts of the world.
Our world needs more MAKERS like Musk; fewer TAKERS like: