The game idea is interesting. The trust layer is not.If $DIGR is a real project and not a 5-hour ticker, fix the risk issues in public.We need: verified contract and sell-path proof so GMGN honeypot flags can be cleared; LP lock or burn on-chain; full tokenomics, team wallets, and vesting; and a clear answer on buybacks. Player burns on claim are not a team buyback.Anonymous team + no lock + scanner red flags will keep serious users out. Handle this, and I will bring my community in deep. Leave it vague, and this dies fast.@DigrRh
The product idea is interesting. The trust layer is not. If these items stay vague, people will treat $DIGR as an unverified meme, not a game token, and the project will stall.Please reply with links, addresses, and a timeline. We would rather see this fixed than watch it fade.We’re early supporters of the game and the RWA mining idea, but the current setup is putting the project at serious risk.Please address these points publicly and on-chain as soon as possible:Tokenomics. Publish total supply, allocation, team/investor wallets, and a real vesting schedule. Right now there is no lock-up disclosure. That alone will keep serious users away.
Contract and LP. Verify the contract on the official explorer. Clarify owner permissions, mint, blacklist, pause, and tax. Show whether LP is locked or burned, for how long, and by whom.
The GMGN honeypot flag. The DIGR/GLD pair plus the claim-and-burn path is triggering “honeypot” warnings. Explain the exact transfer logic, and prove that ordinary wallets can sell back into the pool. A 5-hour-old token with a red flag will die in the trenches.
Buybacks vs burns. User burns on claim are not a team buyback. If you have no repurchase plan, say so. If you do, publish the wallet, rules, and on-chain proof.
Team. An anonymous account plus no vesting is a short life expectancy on Robinhood Chain. At minimum, disclose a multisig, a public builder identity, or a time-locked team allocation.
The product idea is interesting. The trust layer is not. If these items stay vague, people will treat $DIGR as an unverified meme, not a game token, and the project will stall.Please reply with links, addresses, and a timeline. We would rather see this fixed than watch it fade.We’re early supporters of the game and the RWA mining idea, but the current setup is putting the project at serious risk.Please address these points publicly and on-chain as soon as possible:Tokenomics. Publish total supply, allocation, team/investor wallets, and a real vesting schedule. Right now there is no lock-up disclosure. That alone will keep serious users away.
Contract and LP. Verify the contract on the official explorer. Clarify owner permissions, mint, blacklist, pause, and tax. Show whether LP is locked or burned, for how long, and by whom.
The GMGN honeypot flag. The DIGR/GLD pair plus the claim-and-burn path is triggering “honeypot” warnings. Explain the exact transfer logic, and prove that ordinary wallets can sell back into the pool. A 5-hour-old token with a red flag will die in the trenches.
Buybacks vs burns. User burns on claim are not a team buyback. If you have no repurchase plan, say so. If you do, publish the wallet, rules, and on-chain proof.
Team. An anonymous account plus no vesting is a short life expectancy on Robinhood Chain. At minimum, disclose a multisig, a public builder identity, or a time-locked team allocation.