IT'S SO NICE TO SEE EVERYONE COMPROMISING THEIR MENTAL AND PHYSICAL HEALTH IN THE MIDDLE OF A GLOBAL PANDEMIC TO SUBMIT FOR A CONFERENCE THAT WON'T HAPPEN TO COMPETE FOR JOBS THAT WON'T EXIST.
KEEP UP THE GREAT WORK EVERYONE! #CHI2021
IN ADDITION TO THE POSH EARPIECE, I SUGGEST #CHI2019 VOLUNTEER IPAD JOCKEYS BE SUPPLIED A CAMELBACK OF ARDBEG AND A LONG STRAW; IT WILL MAKE CHI ACADEMY MEMBERS TALKING AT YOUR BELLY LESS DEHUMANIZING.
I HATE THE EARLY DEADLINE. AS IF YOUR PAPERS DIDN'T HAVE ENOUGH TO WORRY ABOUT WHAT WITH WONDERING IF THEY'RE IN THE RIGHT TEMPLATE, AND BEING TERRIBLE… NOW THEY HAVE TO FEEL BAD ABOUT THEIR DAY DRINKING IN THE AFTERNOON.
RANK 103? WTF. EVERYONE WHO DOESN'T FOLLOW ME BEFORE #CHI2019 HAS ALL THEIR PAPERS AND THEIR FAMILY'S PAPERS REJECTED FOREVER MORE. https://t.co/GkoRLZxbOJ
Here is the list of people that the #chi2018 community think you should be following. https://t.co/Obemcxkee2 Computed by finding the most followed accounts by people tweeting #chi2018. Updated for 2018
WITH #CHI2018 JUST AROUND THE CORNER, CAN SOMEONE REMIND ME IF THE PEOPLE WHOSE PAPERS I REJECTED ARE STILL ALLOWED TO PAY THE $1000 FEE TO SEE BETTER RESEARCHERS PRESENT THEIR WORK?
The lowest scoring #chi2018 paper with a conditional accept had an average score of 2.25. (There’s always hope, Luke Skywalker!) -
LN #chi2018#starwars
I WOULD LIKE TO EXPRESS MY STRONG SUPPORT FOR A REAL REVISE & RESUBMIT PROCESS AT @SIGCHI LIKE REAL JOURNALS THAT REAL SCIENTISTS SUBMIT TO. TOO OFTEN MY FUN IS CUT SHORT, AND VERY RARELY AM I ABLE TO FORCE AUTHORS TO SATISFY MY EVERY WHIM. #CHI2018
DOES ANYONE HAVE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR QUEBEC CIDER I SHOULD DRINK AT THE #CHI2018 PC MEETING?
I'LL BE THIRSTY AFTER LONG ARGUMENTS ABOUT HOW WE NEED AN ACADEMIC FIELD DEDICATED TO UNDERSTANDING AND CRITIQUING THE ROLE OF TECHNOLOGY IN OUR LIVES.
WHAT IF I TOLD YOU THE MEDIAN #CHI2018 SCORE WAS 4.5 AND YOUR PAPER WAS JUST THAT BAD? OR I REVIEWED IT AFTER CONSUMING A BOTTLE OF SCOTCH, WHICH WAS GIFTED TO ME UPON MY 17TH CHI BEST PAPER AWARD.