@Nihilusion I always shower after suiting and wash the currently used underarmour at the same time. I'm blown away how washing underarmour at the con isn't more common
@JakeTrafalgar@POPUFUR If you only wear a pet suit you are visually just naked. He just wore shorts and a chest harness with his petsuit. If he replaced the chest harness with a shirt it wouldn't have been an issue but looking at all the shit he has done the following days he's a huge walking redflag
@Eclipse_Warnock@fonsthebun These have proper fur and are not just printed lycra, two very differently looking types.
The owner of this suit is @be1o4ka
@POPUFUR The petsuit isnt the issue. Its the combination of only shorts, chestharness and petsuit. If he had a shirt on with the shorts and none of the harness stuff it would have been fine
@KyTheDeer@fonsthebun He is wearing a petsuit with only shorts and a chestharness. Visually almost naked. If he was wearing a shirt and no harness it wouldnt have been an issue. Petsuits with no clothing are seen as naked, they need extra clothing to be sfw
@Iudicium86@fonsthebun Petsuits are like a second skin. Just wear a shirt to the shorts and it would have been fine.
Its like wearing a kigurumi zentai suit without clothing
@Eclipse_Warnock@fonsthebun Hes wearing a thin skintight suit with only shorts and a harness xD Basically almost naked. Petsuits are not like fullsuits and need regular clothing to not be seen as "naked". Even the chestharness would already be an issue