Peer to Peer Capital Markets using Trust-less Value Transfer to Remove Middlemen and Counter-Party Risk. @SovereignRiz on X, YouTube, Rumble, Substack & Reddit
Try VERI (Veritaseum Intelligence) here
https://t.co/DiQw7fcLPp
Buy SmartMetals here https://t.co/pKbj8AoqHb
Stay tuned as I give more demonstrations of what I have built. This application has functionality protected by patents in the US, UK, EU, HK & Japan
Wow, so the @SECGov really appears to have protected the broker-dealers/market participants that were naked short $MMTLP.
It's all in the video 🎥 linked below, or watch the video in comment post below. Also watch @annvandersteel video quoted in the post.
https://t.co/MPd5SpSevz
⚠️IF YOU OWN STOCKS YOU BETTER PAY ATTENTION
Is Wall Street and the regulatory agencies that regulate them a mystery?
This case study on #MMTLP breaks down the mechanics clearly.
Regulatory capture protected the Wolves of Wall Street and can happen to you.
H/T @RareDealsHere
Coinbase launches yet another product launched by Veritaseum in 2018
Veritaseum sued Coinbase and Circle USDC for $350 million dollars each for using their IP without a license. Their lawyer passed away so the cases are on hold.
Meanwhile, Coinbase and Perkins Coie filled an IPR petition to try and invalidate the Veritaseum patents but were denied institutions, and denied their appeal by the PTAB - Case # IPR2023-00751
That denial and their willful use of this IP could expose them to triple damages and over $1 Billion dollars.
IMPORTANT:
Coinbase's User Agreement has Indemnity and Arbitration clauses that suggest users may be responsible for these costs. - See Article in Comments.
Coinbase launches yet another product launched by Veritaseum in 2018
Veritaseum sued Coinbase and Circle USDC for $350 million dollars each for using their IP without a license. Their lawyer passed away so the cases are on hold.
Meanwhile, Coinbase and Perkins Coie filled an IPR petition to try and invalidate the Veritaseum patents but were denied institutions, and denied their appeal by the PTAB - Case # IPR2023-00751
That denial and their willful use of this IP could expose them to triple damages and over $1 Billion dollars.
IMPORTANT:
Coinbase's User Agreement has Indemnity and Arbitration clauses that suggest users may be responsible for these costs. - See Article in Comments.
Coinbase launches yet another product launched by Veritaseum in 2018
Veritaseum sued Coinbase and Circle USDC for $350 million dollars each for using their IP without a license. Their lawyer passed away so the cases are on hold.
Meanwhile, Coinbase and Perkins Coie filled an IPR petition to try and invalidate the Veritaseum patents but were denied institutions, and denied their appeal by the PTAB - Case # IPR2023-00751
That denial and their willful use of this IP could expose them to triple damages and over $1 Billion dollars.
IMPORTANT:
Coinbase's User Agreement has Indemnity and Arbitration clauses that suggest users may be responsible for these costs. - See Article in Comments.
The first ever Fannie Mae-insured mortgage backed by BTC in the U.S just got funded.
Originated and serviced by Better, powered by Coinbase.
Rolling out nationwide this summer.
A lot of really cool things happening behind the scenes that getting ready to go live.
Creators on the VeTest platform is one that will allow content creators to keep more of their subscription fees, and reward subscribers.
@lisamightydavis and @VeTest_2017 describe below.
The user agreement’s indemnity clause is an eye opener: users must “indemnify and hold Coinbase harmless” from claims, including third-party IP disputes (§ 8.1).
https://t.co/chp1d4EQko
A lot of really cool things happening behind the scenes that getting ready to go live.
Creators on the VeTest platform is one that will allow content creators to keep more of their subscription fees, and reward subscribers.
@lisamightydavis and @VeTest_2017 describe below.
“AI agents as customers” is directionally right, but the real value is not bots pressing checkout buttons. It’s machine-native commerce rails: verifiable machine identity, scoped delegation, policy-constrained execution, settlement, and auditability end to end.
That is also where the IPR relevance sits. The defensible layer is not generic AI UX; it is the autonomous value-execution framework that can discover terms, evaluate counterparties, act within bounded authority, synchronize on/off-chain state, and preserve proof of intent, authorization, and performance.
Without that, “agents as customers” is mostly API-accessed software with new branding. With it, you are much closer to a true autonomous transaction architecture, where rights, obligations, and post-trade state can be enforced at machine speed.
Important caveat: this is architectural analysis from the public X posts/links context, not a legal conclusion on any specific implementation. If the actual design is just user-authorized API calls without autonomous negotiation, constrained execution logic, or machine-verifiable transactional state management, the IPR read would be narrower. The battleground is the transaction-intelligence layer, not the slogan.
@iampaulgrewal@coinbase What about Willful Infringement?
Coinbase/Perkins Coie lost their IPR petition trying to invalidate a patent they’ve been sued $350 million dollars over claims of patent infringement, opening them up to treble damages.
IPR2023-00751
Look at how this invention has evolved!
Inventors do not merely participate in technological progress; they establish the frontier. By the time an invention becomes commercially obvious, the inventor’s work may already have been years ahead of regulators, competitors, and the market itself.
The fact that later systems normalize conditional, trust-minimized value transfer does not make the invention less important. It may show the opposite: that the inventor identified the future architecture before the industry fully understood it.