Olivia
Online
Space
@SpaceEllis
American Woman (XX) {my markers}; Favorite Political Button: Blondes Prefer Reagan; Music Loving Deadhead; Highly Educated Suburban Republican; Pet Mommy
Portland, TN
Joined March 2013
150 Following
102 Followers
4.9K Posts
Hear, hear!
Republicans finally have the votes to pass election integrity legislation and what stops them?
Not Democrats. Not the media. Not activists.
Republicans.
The American people didn’t hand Republicans control of the Senate so they could hide behind procedural excuses and parliamentary gymnastics. They were elected to govern.
We voters are tired of hearing, “We would have done it, but…”
You have the majority.
Use it. Don’t be filthy like those lying democrats.
Democrats never seem to have this problem. When they want something, they fight for it. @Republicans Republicans spend half their time explaining why they can’t do the very things they campaigned on.
At some point voters stop asking whether Republicans can win elections and start asking whether they have the courage to use the victories they already have.
A majority that refuses to govern isn’t leadership.
It’s a spectator sport.
#AStoneGroove #SilentMajoritySpeaks
Il faut avoir l'honnêteté de reconnaître le coup de génie de la gauche, parce que c'en est un. Le plus grand hold-up rhétorique du siècle tient en un seul mot : raciste.
Voici le mécanisme.
Après 1945, après les droits civiques, l'Occident a fait du racisme le mal absolu. À juste titre : c'est une de ses plus grandes conquêtes morales. « Raciste » est devenu le mot le plus radioactif de la langue, l'excommunication moderne, la mort sociale instantanée.
Le coup de génie a été de détourner ce capital moral. Pas pour protéger des personnes : pour protéger une idéologie.
L'égalitarisme des résultats ne gagne jamais un débat sur les faits. Il produit l'inverse de ce qu'il promet, partout, à chaque fois. Alors plutôt que de gagner le débat, on a rendu le débat impayable. Tu questionnes les résultats de l'immigration sans assimilation ? Raciste. Tu défends le mérite ? Raciste. Les maths avancées ? Racistes. Les frontières ? Racistes. Le mot a cessé de décrire un comportement pour décrire une position sur l'échiquier.
Et regardez la beauté technique du dispositif. Pas besoin d'arguments : l'accusation suffit. Pas besoin de procès : la dénégation aggrave le cas (votre défensivité prouve votre culpabilité). Pas besoin de police : la peur fait le travail, chacun se surveille lui-même et surveille son voisin gratuitement. Il suffit d'exécuter publiquement quelques exemples par an pour tenir des millions de gens. Une idéologie irréfutable, protégée par un mot imprononçable. Les deux pare-feux du même système : la French Theory avait aboli la vérité, l'accusation a aboli le débat.
Est-ce qu'un comité s'est réuni pour concevoir ça ? Pas besoin. Les idées subissent une sélection darwinienne : celles qui survivent sont celles qui se défendent le mieux. Marcuse avait quand même déposé le brevet dès 1965, noir sur blanc : tolérance pour les mouvements de gauche, intolérance pour ceux de droite. Le reste a évolué tout seul. Il faut l'avouer : c'était génial.
Mais ce dispositif génial avait un coût, et le coût a un bilan. À Rotherham, le rapport officiel Jay a établi que des fonctionnaires britanniques ont laissé plus de 1 400 gamines se faire exploiter pendant seize ans, en partie par peur d'être traités de racistes s'ils nommaient les faits. Relisez cette phrase. Des enfants ont été sacrifiées à un mot. Voilà ce que veut dire idéologie mortifère : pas une métaphore, un bilan.
Et maintenant, regardez ce qui s'effondre sous nos yeux.
Une insulte ne fonctionne que si elle fait peur, et une monnaie ne fonctionne que si elle est rare. Ils ont imprimé le mot comme Weimar imprimait le mark. Quand tout est raciste, plus rien ne l'est. Résultat : des tweets qui commencent par « traitez-moi de raciste si vous voulez » récoltent des dizaines de milliers de likes et l'approbation de l'homme le plus riche du monde. Il y a dix ans, cette phrase était un suicide professionnel. Aujourd'hui, c'est un haussement d'épaules. L'hyperinflation a tué la monnaie.
Et voilà la vraie tragédie, que les faussaires devront porter : en imprimant le mot sans limite, ils l'ont brûlé pour tout le monde. Y compris pour nommer le vrai racisme quand il existe, car il existe. Les faux-monnayeurs ne détruisent pas que leur arme. Ils détruisent le mot dont une société honnête a besoin.
Privée de son mot magique, l'idéologie va maintenant devoir faire ce qu'elle n'a jamais su faire : gagner un débat sur les faits.
Elle ne le gagnera pas. Au travail.
@m_stevenson78 Congratulations! What an accomplishment!
Good luck in your electrical apprenticeship!
WOW! Dr. Alveda King just delivered a powerful message on Capitol Hill:
“I still have a dream… that we move beyond black power and white power and embrace GOD’S power and human dignity!”
She rejected treating traditional Christians as threats or terrorists, called for seeing each other as neighbors, and reminded us we are one blood, one human race from womb to tomb.
Who to follow
@ByronDonalds Thank you for sharing your story - it was what I needed to hear right now in my life 🙏
51 votes for the SAVE America Act during tonight’s budget reconciliation vote-a-rama
That means that but for the Zombie Filibuster, the House-passed SAVE America Act would now be on its way to the White House for President Trump’s signature
💥 KABOOM 💥🚨
Marco Rubio just said something that’s blowing up online.
He pointed to Americans who worked their entire lives, only to retire on $800–$1,000 a month in Social Security.
Then compared it to claims that some new arrivals receive higher monthly benefits.
Read that again.
Worked your whole life…
Less support.
Just arrived…
More support?
🇺🇸🔥
This is why the debate over benefits, fairness, and government priorities is EXPLODING right now.
People are asking:
Who comes first?
America First — that’s the message.
Watch closely.
💯
I need you to picture something for me.
It is New Year's Eve. The year is 2011. Blanchard, Oklahoma.
There is an 18-year-old girl alone in a mobile home. Her husband — 40 years her senior, her best friend, her protector — died of lung cancer six days ago. On Christmas Day. She buried him, came home, and now it is New Year's Eve and she is holding a three-month-old baby boy.
Her name is Sarah McKinley.
She hears a knock at the door. She looks through the peephole. A man she does not know — a man named Justin Martin who had showed up at her husband's funeral under the pretense of offering condolences — is standing on her porch. He says he is a neighbor who needs help. Her gut says something else entirely. She tells him to leave.
He doesn't leave.
He goes to the back door and tries to force his way in. He is not alone. There are two of them. And through the door, he tells her: "Let me in or I'll kill you."
Think about that for one second. Her husband is six days in the ground. She has a baby in her arms. She is 18 years old. And a man is threatening to kill her while trying to break down her door.
What Sarah McKinley did next is the part the gun control crowd does not want to talk about.
She put the bottle in the baby's mouth. She grabbed her 12-gauge shotgun. She grabbed her pistol. She pushed a couch against one door, went to the bedroom, and called 911. She had two guns in her hands and an infant in her lap, and she stayed on the phone with dispatcher Diane Graham for 21 minutes while those men worked to get through her door.
At one point she asked the dispatcher a question that should be on the wall of every legislature in America: "I've got two guns in my hand. Is it OK to shoot him if he comes in this door?"
Dispatcher Diane Graham said: "I can't tell you that you can do that, but you have to do what you have to do to protect your baby."
Twenty-one minutes. She held the line for twenty-one minutes.
When Justin Martin finally kicked through that door and came toward her with a 12-inch hunting knife, Sarah McKinley pulled the trigger.
He was pronounced dead at the scene. His accomplice was charged with first-degree murder under Oklahoma law — which holds that when you commit a crime and a death results, you are responsible for that death. No charges were filed against Sarah. Oklahoma law was perfectly clear on why.
No charges. Because the law recognized something that the gun control lobby cannot bring itself to acknowledge: she had every right to be alive.
The media gave this story exactly the coverage you would expect for a story that destroys the narrative. A few days. Some local coverage. A brief appearance on a cable talk show. And then it disappeared. No Everytown fundraiser. No congressional testimony. No orange awareness ribbon for Sarah McKinley. Because she survived. And the gun control campaign has no use for survivors.
Now let me give you the data behind what you just read.
John Lott — University of Chicago economist, researcher of 13,312 statistically controlled regressions across every county in America — found that approximately 95 percent of the time a gun is used defensively, it is NEVER EVEN FIRED. A woman opens a curtain and points a gun at a man kicking down her door, and he runs — straight into a wall in one documented case — and no shot is ever fired. No dead body. No 911 call. No news story. And no awareness campaign.
Between 760,000 and 3.6 million defensive gun uses occur in America every year, depending on which survey you use. The Department of Justice's own floor estimate is 65,000. A JAMA study from March 2025 put the number of DGUs where a firearm was actually discharged at 489,000 annually. That is almost HALF A MILLION times in a single year that a law-abiding person used a firearm to stop a crime being committed against them or someone they loved.
You do not hear about them because nobody died. And nobody died because the gun was there.
The Supreme Court has already settled the question of whether the government is required to protect you. DeShaney v. Winnebago County, 1989. Town of Castle Rock v. Gonzales, 2005. The answer is no. No legal obligation. None. You are your own first responder. That is not a political argument. That is settled constitutional law from the highest court in the United States.
So the political class that just told you the government is not required to protect you... is also the political class trying to disarm the Sarah McKinleys of this country.
Think about what that actually means. An 18-year-old widow with a baby and a 12-gauge is the reason a three-month-old boy grew up with a mother. Take the gun out of that story and tell me how it ends differently.
I will wait.
Quinn's Law Number One. Liberalism produces the opposite of its stated intent. They say they want to protect women. They want to disarm the tool that kept one alive on New Year's Eve while she sat on a bedroom floor with a baby in her lap and a man threatening to kill her on the other side of the door.
I am DONE with the performance. I am done with the orange shirts and the awareness months that suppress the data that would actually SAVE the people they claim to be fighting for. The research is not ambiguous. The story is not ambiguous. The law is not ambiguous.
The gun does not make you violent. It makes you hard to kill. And for people who want to hurt you, that distinction is everything.
But what do I know — I am only a combat medic who has spent his entire adult life trying to keep people alive, a father of four daughters who sleep safely in their house, and a science teacher who believes the data matters more than the fundraising cycle.
IF you agree:
LIKE this post so the algorithm shows it to people who need to read it.
SHARE this — someone on your feed right now needs to hear Sarah McKinley's name.
COMMENT below. Did you know this story? Tell me.
And if you want MORE of this -- the data, the history, the science, the stories -- JOIN Bski's Classroom community on X or YouTube.
#MAGA #Veterans #Trump
@JoJoFromJerz @atrupar @GuntherEagleman
I used to believe that Donald Trump was simply an exceptional president.
But then, I watched in real time as the Mainstream Media (mainstream media), the FBI, intelligence agencies, the CIA, Big Tech, and the entire Washington establishment joined forces in an unprecedented campaign to destroy a single man.
The numerous lawsuits, the two impeachments, the endless hoaxes including the Russia one, the Mar-a-Lago raid, the gag orders, the efforts to remove him from the ballot, the attempts to bankrupt him and throw him in prison... all of that was aimed at preventing him from returning to power. Two attempts on his life followed.
With 92% of media coverage being negative toward him while 78% of that for Kamala was positive, he managed to secure a convincing victory in the last election. How do you explain that?
That's when it became undeniable for me: no one faces this level of coordinated and hysterical opposition unless they represent a true existential threat to the system... The system we all know is corrupt and broken. Ordinary politicians don't trigger this kind of coordinated panic.
At that moment, I stopped thinking of him as a great president.
He is the greatest of all time.
Dear @WhiteHouse, my name is Rodney Smith Jr., founder of Raising Men & Women Lawn Care Service in Huntsville, Alabama. Through our 50 Yard Challenge, over 6,000 kids across the country have signed up to mow free lawns for the elderly, disabled, veterans, active-duty military, first responders, and single parents. With America celebrating its 250th birthday this year and me also being born on July 4th, I wanted to humbly ask if a few kids from our program and myself could travel to Washington, D.C. to help mow the White House lawn for this historic celebration.
More than anything, I want these kids to see how a simple act of service something as ordinary as mowing a lawn for someone in need can lead to extraordinary places. What better lesson in community service than showing them that helping others can take them all the way to our nation’s capital? I’d also love to bring my American flag-themed mower in hopes that the President might sign it, so I can later auction it off and donate 100% of the proceeds to a nonprofit supporting veterans. It would be a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to highlight the importance of service, patriotism, and the impact young people can have when they choose to make a difference. 🇺🇸
@IV_Musketeer The study & classifying the protocol is false but the radial artery cooling is based in science.
You can also warm yourself quickly by running your wrists under hot (not scalding) water for a few minutes.
It’s based on the physiology of blood flow & quickly warming/cooling it
I came across a story today that unexpectedly hit me right in the chest.
A woman went to visit the father of her second child and noticed something strange. This was a man who loved televisions. The bigger, the better. Yet hanging on his wall was a tiny 32-inch TV.
She asked what happened to his big television.
He told her it had broken months ago.
Naturally, she asked why he hadn’t replaced it.
His answer changed everything.
He said he wanted to make sure her oldest son had the clothes, shoes, and everything else he needed. The oldest boy wasn’t even biologically his. The child’s father had been absent for years, but this man quietly stepped into the gap and never complained about it.
While everyone else saw an ordinary television on a wall, she suddenly saw years of sacrifice. Every pair of shoes. Every shirt. Every expense. Every time he put that child ahead of himself.
So she spent a month secretly saving money and bought him an 85-inch television.
When the installers finished mounting it, the man stood there confused. Then the reality of what she had done hit him. He wrapped his arms around her and cried.
Not because of the television.
Because someone finally noticed.
Someone finally saw the sacrifices he had made when nobody was looking.
We hear a lot about toxic men, absent men, and irresponsible men. What we don’t hear enough about are the men quietly carrying burdens that aren’t even theirs to carry. Men who step into a child’s life without obligation. Men who spend their own money, sacrifice their own comforts, and ask for nothing in return.
The television wasn’t the gift.
Being seen was.
And for a lot of good men, that may be the rarest gift of all.
#SilentMajoritySpeaks #AStoneGroove
#ShanlavellJames Facebook
Cops are doing what British officials have and what public sentiment have been directing them towards over the last 20 years: illegals & criminals are victims, whites are evil oppressors who must be stopped. This tragedy was only a matter of time…
https://t.co/s66h7fEJe4
@AlBuffalo2nite I’ll take it one step further: ancestry lineage should not determine who I should and shouldn’t care for - I can care for whomever I wish for any reason I wish: anyone judging me by my race, creed, nationality, birthplace, family structure, income bracket etc…is blatantly wrong
@BskiMike22802 I heard about it at the time but I don’t remember where I heard about it, Fox, Daily Wire, or X. What I do know is that the story disappeared quickly.
It is June. National Gun Violence Awareness Month.
And I have a story the media buried the moment it happened — exactly one year ago this month.
June 22, 2025. CrossPointe Community Church. Wayne, Michigan. Sunday morning service. About 150 people inside, including CHILDREN attending Vacation Bible School.
Brian Browning, 31, pulled into that parking lot wearing camouflage and a tactical vest. He got out of his silver SUV. He had an AR-15-style rifle, a semi-automatic handgun with an extended magazine, MORE THAN A DOZEN fully loaded magazines, and HUNDREDS of rounds of ammunition.
Let me let that sink in. Hundreds of rounds. Children in that building.
He opened fire.
Here is where the story changes. Deacon Richard Pryor was running late and pulled into the parking lot. He saw Browning walking toward the entrance. He made a decision — and he drove his truck directly into the shooter, stopping his advance and alerting the security team inside. Simultaneously, Jay Trombley — a volunteer. Not a cop. A VOLUNTEER — heard "AR-15" from a fleeing woman inside, and he moved TOWARD the sound instead of away from it. The security team locked the front doors, engaged Browning, and shot him dead.
One security guard took a non-fatal round to the leg. That is it. No children died. Nobody in that sanctuary died. 150 people went home to their families.
Wayne Police Chief Ryan Strong said it plainly: "We are grateful for the heroic actions of the church's staff members, who UNDOUBTEDLY SAVED MANY LIVES and prevented a LARGE-SCALE MASS SHOOTING."
Now. Where was CNN? Where was MSNBC? Where was the hand-wringing, breathless, 48-hour wall-to-wall coverage that we get every single time a gun is used to harm someone?
I will tell you where it was. It was nowhere. Because nobody died — outside of the attacker who chose that outcome for himself. And a story where an armed citizen STOPS a massacre does not fit the June narrative. It never does.
This is Quinn's Law Number One in neon lights: LIBERALISM PRODUCES THE OPPOSITE OF ITS STATED INTENT. They say they want to stop gun violence. They suppress the single most important data point — that armed, prepared, TRAINED citizens stop gun violence MORE OFTEN than they create it.
The Gun Violence Archive tracked over 18,000 documented defensive gun uses between 2014 and 2025. A JAMA Network Open study published in March 2025 estimated 489,000 defensive gun uses annually in which a firearm was DISCHARGED. Not brandished. Discharged. The National Crime Victimization Survey puts the floor at 65,000 per year on the conservative end. But the media covers approximately zero of them with any consistency, because zero dead bodies at a Sunday service does not generate the donations and the outrage clicks that their editorial model depends on.
74% of convicted felons in a National Institute of Justice survey said they AVOIDED homes they believed were occupied by armed residents. SEVENTY-FOUR PERCENT. The deterrence is real and the data is not ambiguous. But they need you not to know that.
I want to be clear about something. I am not some glib armchair observer making abstract policy arguments. I am a medically retired Army combat medic. I have seen what happens when the people who need protection have none. I have packed wounds that should have been fatal. I have held men together with my hands. I have put consequences of violence into black bags. And I am telling you with every ounce of authority that experience gives me: DISARMING THE LAW-ABIDING DOES NOT PROTECT ANYONE. It only changes who holds the power in the moment that power matters most.
CrossPointe Community Church had a trained, armed security team because they took responsibility for the people in their care. They went to training THREE DAYS before the shooting. Three days.
The Supreme Court has ruled — twice — that the government has NO legal obligation to protect you. DeShaney v. Winnebago County (1989). Town of Castle Rock v. Gonzales (2005). You are your own first responder. Jay Trombley said those exact words after he survived.
You want to do something meaningful this June? Share this story. The one they will not tell you. Then go get your carry permit and your training, because the police will do their absolute best — and they will still arrive after. That is not a criticism. That is physics.
But what do I know — I am only a combat medic, a science teacher, a published textbook author, and a father of four who has spent his entire adult life trying to reduce human suffering, and who read the actual data instead of watching the June fundraising cycle.
IF you agree:
LIKE this post so the algorithm shows it to people who need to read it.
SHARE this.
COMMENT below with your take. Did you hear about CrossPointe Church? Or did the media hide it from you? Tell me.
And if you want MORE of this -- the data, the history, the science, the stories -- JOIN Bski's Classroom community on X or YouTube.
#MAGA #Veterans #Trump
@JoJoFromJerz @atrupar @catturd2
𝐓𝐇𝐎𝐌𝐀𝐒 𝐒𝐎𝐖𝐄𝐋𝐋 𝐎𝐍 𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐎𝐍𝐄 𝐋𝐈𝐍𝐄 𝐓𝐇𝐀𝐓 𝐄𝐗𝐏𝐋𝐀𝐈𝐍𝐒 𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐂𝐎𝐋𝐋𝐀𝐏𝐒𝐄 𝐎𝐅 𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐁𝐋𝐀𝐂𝐊 𝐀𝐌𝐄𝐑𝐈𝐂𝐀𝐍 𝐅𝐀𝐌𝐈𝐋𝐘
Congressman Burgess Owens just resurfaced a Thomas Sowell interview that condenses sixty years of American social policy into 𝐧𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐭𝐲 𝐬𝐞𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐝𝐬:
“𝘞𝘩𝘦𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘺 𝘵𝘢𝘭𝘬 𝘢𝘣𝘰𝘶𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨𝘴 𝘭𝘪𝘬𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴, 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘺 𝘵𝘢𝘭𝘬 𝘢𝘣𝘰𝘶𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘭𝘦𝘨𝘢𝘤𝘺 𝘰𝘧 𝘴𝘭𝘢𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘺. 𝘈𝘯𝘥 𝘐 𝘢𝘳𝘨𝘶𝘦, 𝘸𝘦𝘭𝘭, 𝘦𝘮𝘱𝘪𝘳𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘺, 𝘪𝘵’𝘴 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵. 𝘐𝘵’𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘭𝘦𝘨𝘢𝘤𝘺 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘸𝘦𝘭𝘧𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘵𝘦. 𝘉𝘦𝘤𝘢𝘶𝘴𝘦 𝘢𝘴 𝘰𝘧 1960, 𝘸𝘩𝘪𝘤𝘩 𝘪𝘴 𝘢𝘭𝘮𝘰𝘴𝘵 100 𝘺𝘦𝘢𝘳𝘴 𝘢𝘧𝘵𝘦𝘳 𝘴𝘭𝘢𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘺 𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘥, 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘮𝘢𝘫𝘰𝘳𝘪𝘵𝘺 𝘰𝘧 𝘣𝘭𝘢𝘤𝘬 𝘬𝘪𝘥𝘴 𝘸𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘣𝘦𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘳𝘢𝘪𝘴𝘦𝘥 𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘸𝘰-𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘩𝘰𝘶𝘴𝘦𝘩𝘰𝘭𝘥𝘴. 𝘉𝘶𝘵 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯 𝘰𝘯𝘦 𝘨𝘦𝘯𝘦𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘢𝘧𝘵𝘦𝘳 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘸𝘦𝘭𝘧𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘵𝘦, 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘩𝘢𝘥 𝘥𝘳𝘰𝘱𝘱𝘦𝘥 𝘥𝘰𝘸𝘯 𝘵𝘰 𝘢 𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘰𝘳𝘪𝘵𝘺. 𝘈𝘯𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘮𝘢𝘫𝘰𝘳𝘪𝘵𝘺 𝘰𝘧 𝘣𝘭𝘢𝘤𝘬 𝘬𝘪𝘥𝘴 𝘵𝘰𝘥𝘢𝘺 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘳𝘢𝘪𝘴𝘦𝘥 𝘪𝘯 𝘰𝘯𝘦-𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘩𝘰𝘶𝘴𝘦𝘩𝘰𝘭𝘥𝘴.”
Sowell’s closing line on the historical record: “𝘊𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘪𝘦𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘴𝘭𝘢𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘺, 𝘨𝘦𝘯𝘦𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘑𝘪𝘮 𝘊𝘳𝘰𝘸 𝘥𝘪𝘥 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘥𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘰𝘺 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘣𝘭𝘢𝘤𝘬 𝘧𝘢𝘮𝘪𝘭𝘺. 𝘉𝘶𝘵 𝘰𝘯𝘦 𝘨𝘦𝘯𝘦𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘸𝘦𝘭𝘧𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘵𝘦 𝘥𝘪𝘥.”
Read the receipts behind the claim. In 1960, the Black two-parent household share was approximately 𝟕𝟖 𝐩𝐞𝐫𝐜𝐞𝐧𝐭. By 1996, after a single generation of Great Society welfare incentives that paid more to single mothers than to married ones, that figure had collapsed to about 𝟑𝟔 𝐩𝐞𝐫𝐜𝐞𝐧𝐭. The data is from the U.S. Census itself, not a think tank.
On the policy mechanism that did it. The original 1965 Aid to Families with Dependent Children formula 𝐬𝐮𝐛𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐜𝐭𝐞𝐝 𝐛𝐞𝐧𝐞𝐟𝐢𝐭𝐬 𝐝𝐨𝐥𝐥𝐚𝐫-𝐟𝐨𝐫-𝐝𝐨𝐥𝐥𝐚𝐫 𝐰𝐡𝐞𝐧 𝐚 𝐦𝐚𝐧 𝐰𝐚𝐬 𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐡𝐨𝐦𝐞. The federal government, in writing, 𝐩𝐚𝐢𝐝 𝐁𝐥𝐚𝐜𝐤 𝐦𝐨𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐬 𝐭𝐨 𝐞𝐯𝐢𝐜𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐟𝐚𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐢𝐫 𝐜𝐡𝐢𝐥𝐝𝐫𝐞𝐧.
On who benefits from pretending the legacy of slavery did this. 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐬𝐚𝐦𝐞 𝐩𝐨𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐥 𝐜𝐥𝐚𝐬𝐬 that wrote those welfare formulas, 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐬𝐚𝐦𝐞 𝐩𝐨𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐥 𝐜𝐥𝐚𝐬𝐬 that has now run every major Black-majority American city for the last fifty years, 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐬𝐚𝐦𝐞 𝐩𝐨𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐥 𝐜𝐥𝐚𝐬𝐬 whose entire electoral coalition depends on the broken household it created.
𝐒𝐨𝐰𝐞𝐥𝐥 𝐰𝐚𝐬 𝐫𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭 𝐚𝐛𝐨𝐮𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐢𝐧 𝟏𝟗𝟖𝟎. 𝐇𝐞 𝐰𝐚𝐬 𝐫𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭 𝐚𝐛𝐨𝐮𝐭 𝐢𝐭 𝐢𝐧 𝟐𝟎𝟎𝟎. 𝐇𝐞 𝐢𝐬 𝐫𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭 𝐚𝐛𝐨𝐮𝐭 𝐢𝐭 𝐭𝐨𝐝𝐚𝐲. 𝐀𝐧𝐲𝐨𝐧𝐞 𝐬𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐨𝐮𝐬 𝐚𝐛𝐨𝐮𝐭 𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐁𝐥𝐚𝐜𝐤 𝐟𝐚𝐦𝐢𝐥𝐲 𝐚𝐥𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐝𝐲 𝐤𝐧𝐨𝐰𝐬 𝐰𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐞 𝐭𝐨 𝐥𝐨𝐨𝐤.
@BurgessOwens
Circa 2010, inside a Yale Law School discussion group focused on social decline in working-class America, a 24-year-old son of Appalachian poverty named JD Vance sat down next to a 24-year-old daughter of Telugu Hindu immigrants from San Diego named Usha Chilukuri, and what unfolded between them over the following months became one of the most quietly compelling personal stories in American political history. JD had arrived at Yale carrying the full weight of a childhood defined by chaos, his mother's struggles with addiction, multiple unstable living situations, a family history of poverty stretching back through the Kentucky hills, and the specific kind of social anxiety that grips a person who has clawed their way into a room where everyone else seems to know the rules by instinct. Usha had taken a different path to the same building, graduating from Yale as an undergraduate, earning a master's degree from Cambridge as a Gates Scholar, and arriving at Yale Law as someone who already understood how elite institutions functioned because she had grown up around parents who valued education as the central organizing principle of their immigrant lives. Their law professor Amy Chua, who would later become a mutual mentor to both, described meeting them as love at first sight on JD's end, noting she had never seen anyone so immediately and completely captivated. JD himself wrote in his bestselling 2016 memoir Hillbilly Elegy that he thought about Usha constantly after their first date and that one friend described him as heartsick, a word that belongs to a completely different emotional register than the combative political persona he would later build in public. What made their dynamic so remarkable from the beginning was its inversion of every expected dynamic, Usha, the immigrant daughter, was the one who knew how to navigate the formal dinner silverware, which fork for which course, how to dress for certain rooms, how to carry yourself in settings designed to exclude people like JD by making them feel permanently out of place. JD called her his Yale spirit guide openly and without embarrassment, and classmates who knew them both described Usha as his guide throughout the entire process of learning to move in a world that had never been designed with someone like him in mind. That partnership, built on genuine need and genuine respect, became the foundation of a marriage that would eventually carry both of them to the second-highest office in the United States.
Last Seen Users on Sotwe
Trends for you
Most Popular Users
Elon Musk 
@elonmusk
240.2M followers
Barack Obama
@barackobama
119.3M followers
Donald J. Trump
@realdonaldtrump
111.6M followers
Cristiano Ronaldo
@cristiano
109.2M followers
Narendra Modi
@narendramodi
106.9M followers
Rihanna
@rihanna
97.3M followers
NASA
@nasa
92.1M followers
Justin Bieber
@justinbieber
90.6M followers
KATY PERRY
@katyperry
87M followers
Taylor Swift
@taylorswift13
80.8M followers
Lady Gaga
@ladygaga
72.3M followers
Kim Kardashian
@kimkardashian
69.5M followers
Virat Kohli
@imvkohli
68.8M followers
YouTube
@youtube
68.6M followers
Bill Gates
@billgates
63.5M followers
The Ellen Show
@theellenshow
62.5M followers
CNN
@cnn
61.9M followers
Neymar Jr
@neymarjr
61.4M followers
X
@x
60.9M followers
Selena Gomez
@selenagomez
60.1M followers