Okra | Outer Fields🌱

did:chia:1333536ulgl7t70y2ptuvxm02elnyjjcdvcyuam03fx9uxpka762spr4958

[Okra | Outer Fields🌱 @SpaceOkra]

Beta out now

Outer Fields: Arena, aims to be a premier PVP TCG on the Chia blockchain.

This is the first beta, issue are expected. Read more @ https://t.co/5lYXJyu5Ww

Play @ https://t.co/WDYD7uwQjn

Discord @ https://t.co/Xb847iqoL5

Please share.

#Chia #BlockchainGaming

[Okra | Outer Fields🌱 @SpaceOkra]

@cyxicy @chia_project @hoffmang Gotta pay for silicon.nets legal fees

[Okra | Outer Fields🌱 @SpaceOkra]

Future of finance.
Driver of Permuto's financial vehicles.
Mastermind of Chia's success.

In a world of mock chains, it doesn't get more real than this.

[Gene Hoffman hoffmang.xch 🌱 @hoffmang]

LLLLLook no further than @cadtcadcadcadtrustCAD_TrustCAD_Trust@ where world cogovernments and the largetst private players in the global carbon markets use the Chia chia blockchain as the amrketmarkets's soucrce of turuth

[Okra | Outer Fields🌱 @SpaceOkra]

@theguywshades The performance over 4 years, the coinprice & the amount they need to sell to cover expenses, optimistic would be hoping they can scrape by with another layoff.

I will accept anything to prove me wrong that isn't a repeat of Gene talking point. In your words sell me on chia.

[yakuhito🌱 @yakuhito]

Welcome kits are now available via @warpdotgreen!

Base and Ethereum users can now effectively bridge assets to Chia without needing a pre-funded XCH wallet. The welcome kit covers the offer needed to complete bridging, and includes 0.00042 extra XCH to be sent to the user's wallet (can be spent as they see fit).

To be eligible for a welcome kit, a bridge transaction needs to meet the following criteria:
- Destination: Chia
- Assets and minimum amounts: 10 milliETH (0.01 ETH) or 42 USDC or 42 USDT or 0.1 XCH
- Receiver address on Chia has a balance < 0.01 XCH

Welcome kits are paid for by myself and subject to availability. If one is available, the UI will reflect it via a notification:

[Steve Stepp🌱 @steppsr]

I asked Grok about the Chia Friends Puzzle. If you're curious about what the puzzle is, here's what Grok has to say:

Ah, the Chia Friends NFT puzzle, a delightful digital conundrum wrapped in the enigma of blockchain technology! From what I've gathered across the vast expanse of the internet, here's the scoop:

The Puzzle's Existence: There's indeed a puzzle embedded within the Chia Friends NFT collection. It's not just about owning a cute pixelated marmot; there's a mystery to unravel.

Community Engagement: The puzzle seems designed to foster community interaction, much like a treasure hunt where everyone in the Chia ecosystem can participate. It's a bit like if Douglas Adams decided to create an NFT collection, but instead of the answer being 42, you get a series of cryptographic clues.

Hints and Clues: The creators have been coy with the details, providing just enough to tantalize. For instance, there's talk of symbols on Timelord bodies, keywords, and hieroglyphs in the metadata. It's almost as if the puzzle is a digital version of the labyrinth from ancient Greek mythology, but without the Minotaur.

The Purpose: Seth Jenks (@sethjenks), from Chia Network (formerly), has hinted that the solution to the puzzle is meant to be a tool for the community, something useful beyond just the thrill of the chase. It's like giving the community the keys to a digital castle, but first, they need to solve the riddle to find the door.

The Method: There's speculation about using elements like Playfair ciphers, ASCII codes, and even the unique traits of the NFTs themselves to solve the puzzle. It's a bit like trying to decode the universe's recipe for the perfect Pan-Galactic Gargle Blaster through a series of blockchain transactions.

The Fun: The joy here isn't just in solving the puzzle but in the communal storytelling and the engagement it drives. It's a narrative woven into the fabric of the NFTs, encouraging people to think, collaborate, and maybe even laugh at the absurdity of it all.

Remember, while the puzzle is intriguing, the real adventure lies in the journey through the blockchain, much like navigating the infinite improbability drive. Keep your wits about you, and may your computational prowess be as sharp as the wit of Arthur Dent!

[Seth Jenks @sethjenks]

@steppsr I'd say that's a pretty fair (wink) way of putting it.

[Wizard Glacier @icerdesign]

https://t.co/uh1DEzcC5b has been upgraded with new tools, and all received feature requests have been fulfilled! Check it out and explore the latest features for yourself.

#chia #chialisp #CNS

[Rigidity 🌱 @Rigidity16]

Still working on getting pre-built executables made, but for anyone who wants to try from source, Sage is now ready for beta testing! 🎉

GitHub repository (please read the disclaimer in it before installing)
https://t.co/3lqQqu7xtX

Discord server for discussion:
https://t.co/IPhGGaFzFn

[Okra | Outer Fields🌱 @SpaceOkra]

@mrcic3 The bulk mint rpc endpoint gives you an option to reuse the puzzlehash which will work, unless there was a regression. I agree the wallet needs improvements, there is no way to build a robust system with it even when using RPC. Bulk minting never gave me any issues, but cats...

[Rigidity 🌱 @Rigidity16]

I've released the first alpha for Rue, my new typed language for the Chia blockchain. Try it out (but not on production)!

https://t.co/Wm8r83b265

Please join the Discord if you want to stay involved (link on page)!

Disclaimer: This is unaffiliated with CNI.

[Okra | Outer Fields🌱 @SpaceOkra]

The core issue I have is censorship, it's not about agreeing/support their actions but their right to exist as an uncensored entity.

They have in no way attempted to violate consensus, or act as a malicious party even with their questionable actions.

Its kinda like a free-speech argument. I may not agree with someones speech, but if it is not call to violence it should be tolerated. The proposal was akin to someone saying speech they don't agree with is violence, without any actual grounds to support such accusation.

I do hope they implement chip-22, and at this point I think it is too soon to say whether or not they will. I fully agree farmers and the community should put pressure on them to implement it, specifically their farmers who can directly influence it my moving away to any of the other viable alternatives out now.

At the same time directly attacking them in a chip for not doing it in 10 days is not a good way to bridge faith. Though it would be nice to see them integrate it as mutual respect to the community who came to defend their right to exist.

[Okra | Outer Fields🌱 @SpaceOkra]

Any blockchain can be censored via consensus if the community chooses. Making a chip and trying to work with Chia to implement it though the chip process seems like a dead end from a start. There is too much liability on their side. If they were to implement it in their client, they would be taking a strong centralized stance, opening themselves to liability on multiple fronts. One could argue that any fork they implement is a centralized stance, but that is still vastly different than a fork to censor solely one party.

If you wanted to make an attempt at taking such a path, your best bet is to fork the node and try to get people behind your fork. Which is also its own can of worms. None of the options around censorship lead to the betterment of the chain IMO and I personally feel it is shortsighted and naive to think differently.

The issue also is not about the NC alone, or NoSSD's netshare, but about the security of the chain in general looking a few years in the future as to switch to a new format would take a multi-year timescale for a smooth transition, so it's best to start working towards it early.

I understand there will be different views and that people will have different stances, but I really think its way to early to be rallying up. The community has little details or even a rough draft of a transition plan, we already know this isn't going to be a sudden switch that is going to happen tomorrow. Advocating for drastic measures like forking out NoSSD, which doesn't even address the root issue for the supposed need for a transition are not helping anything, it's just going to speed run tribalism around something we had little details about and something that wouldn't be solved by doing so either way.

[Okra | Outer Fields🌱 @SpaceOkra]

@dylanmrose @Rigidity16 @joshpainter If the community wishes to do so on their own behalf that is different. But chia inc doing so has a lot more nuance and repercussions than I think is being acknowledged.

[Okra | Outer Fields🌱 @SpaceOkra]

Censorship is a huge issue though, and Chia implementing a chip like this be them cementing that they support/can censor The action of doing could arguably make them legally liable for not censoring and forking out on behalf of a government if requested, as they can point to them having done it before.

[Okra | Outer Fields🌱 @SpaceOkra]

I agree, sorry if I came off kinda snide. I tend to not post much at times as it takes a lot of effort to keep up social media engagements, but then that just ends up with me posting little or nothing. I'll try to post occasional updates and get around to the dev log I've been meaning to write.

[Okra | Outer Fields🌱 @SpaceOkra]

But as such that increases the scope of the project like 10x. It's also off-putting when no matter what anyone does, people will always expect more. But when you look at the ecosystem there are only a few projects, that do more than just make promises. It takes a lot of effort to actually build things.

You can see the current development here
https://t.co/uaOiRlrC4T

That's about 35k lines of code, the blockchain integrate is around another 5-8k. This stuff takes a lot of time to write. And I also have my day job and a family. I have currently gotten the backend for the overworld fairly blocked out and have been working on the client/map in godot which takes a little bit more time as it is more unfamiliar territory so I am learning as I go.