🚨: The black hole ‘Garguanta’ in Interstellar was so accurate, it took about 100 hours for a single frame to render.
It was so scientifically accurate it literally generated new physics discoveries and helped publish scientific papers.
Well, what I find interesting is that you’re putting more trust in Russia or China when it comes to space imagery. If NASA were regularly posting fake or heavily manipulated images and videos from space, wouldn’t Russia or China have a strong incentive to call them out? They’re both major rivals of the U.S. in space exploration.
Secondly, the video I posted was taken from the International Space Station, which is operated by multiple countries. Russian cosmonauts are part of the ISS crew as well, so the idea that everything coming from the station is simply NASA-produced footage is incorrect
You can also find NASA’s raw mission imagery here: https://t.co/J6204QkUfl
As for edited images of deep-space objects, there’s an important distinction between editing and fabricating. Telescopes such as James Webb observe wavelengths that aren’t visible to the human eye, including infrared. Scientists can map those wavelengths to visible colors in a process often called representative color, allowing us to see information that our eyes otherwise couldn’t detect. The resulting image is processed, but the underlying data comes from actual observations.
🚨: SpaceX’s Starship has just reached orbit for the first time.
The historic Flight 14 marks a major milestone for the world’s largest and most powerful rocket system, successfully delivering 26 next-generation Starlink V3 satellites into orbit.
Congratulations @SpaceX!
☀️ The Sun ejects 1.5 million tons of solar material per second at speeds of up to 1 million mph. Earth remains safe because it’s magnetic field deflects this solar stream.
🚨: Meet Daphnis, a tiny moon of Saturn.
A rock barely the size of a city is violently carving a 26-mile-wide trench through millions of tons of planetary debris.
[SpaceEngine sim]