I’ve been hearing this more and more:
High school students and early careerists are struggling to see real career options.
College costs are at an all-time high, and many are questioning whether a traditional degree is always the best ROI.
I’ll be sharing career pathways, stats, and alternatives worth considering early on—
many with strong lifetime earnings at a fraction of the credentialing cost.
If you want a streamlined source for real career options, hit follow.
I think there's a broader shift happening here.
The question used to be "Should I go to college?". Today, the more important question is "What am I studying, what career opportunities does it create, and does that justify the investment?"
Part of this is rising tuition, but part of it is also the labor market itself. Competition for desirable jobs has increased, employers have access to deeper talent pools, and career paths have become more specialized. The old model of earning a degree, getting hired somewhere regardless of what you studied, and gradually figuring things out over the next 20 years is becoming less common.
Students can no longer assume that simply obtaining a degree will create economic opportunity. They need a clearer understanding of how a field of study connects to actual careers, skill development, internships, and long-term demand in the labor market.
The challenge is that we're asking 17- and 18-year-olds to make increasingly consequential decisions in a world that has become far more complex and competitive.
Very interesting. I think the challenge students face in choosing an institution is only part of the story. As tuition continues to rise, students and families are becoming much more focused on outcomes and ROI. The question is no longer just "Which college should I attend?" but also "What am I studying, and what career opportunities does it create?"
I'd be interested to see Syracuse's enrollment trends by school and major. If demand is shifting toward programs with stronger labor market outcomes, and Syracuse doesn't have as many highly sought-after programs relative to peer institutions, that could explain part of the enrollment challenge beyond demographics alone.
It also feels like there's a disconnect between higher education's enrollment concerns and what many high school students are experiencing. Admission to many top institutions remains incredibly competitive, while students are simultaneously becoming more selective about the degrees they're willing to invest in.
The emphasis should be on "degree that won't get you a job." A degree that aligns with a student's interests and leads to strong career outcomes can completely change the trajectory of their life. The challenge is helping students identify those paths before making the investment.
College IS great. College SHOULD be even better. The problem is that we ask students to make one of the biggest financial decisions of their lives before they fully understand what different degrees, trades, certifications, and careers actually lead to.
Better guidance earlier on would help students find paths that fit their interests, improve career outcomes, and get a faster return on a very large investment.
$300k is insane, but calling higher education the greatest misallocation of capital in recent history is a stretch. The question isn't whether college has value. The question is whether students understand what they're buying and where it leads before taking on the debt.
A degree that leads to a career with strong demand, earnings potential, and advancement opportunities can still be an incredible investment. The problem is that too many students are expected to make that decision with limited exposure to the actual careers on the other side.
AI may change how people learn, but it isn't replacing credentialing, licensing, clinical training, internships, or employer hiring requirements (4 year degrees from accredited universities) anytime soon.
The pressure on higher ed isn't proving college matters. It's proving why this degree at this price is worth the investment. That's a very different argument.
This is why understanding what a degree actually unlocks career-wise is so important before taking on the debt. The issue isn't that college doesn't provide value. It's that many students don't fully understand the alignment between their major, the job market, expected earnings, and the financial commitment they're making.
A better understanding of those pathways upfront doesn't guarantee success, but it gives students a much better chance of pursuing something they're genuinely interested in while also putting themselves in a position to pay back that investment far sooner than 20 years.
As costs continue to rise, the burden of proof shifts from "go to college" to "why this college, why this major, and what does it lead to?" Families are asking these questions more aggressively as higher education comes under increasing scrutiny. With these schools pushing $100k per year and many graduates entering one of the toughest entry-level job markets in years, people want more than vague promises.
The value of a degree isn't disappearing entirely. But blindly enrolling and hoping it all works out is becoming a much riskier bet. Students and families want to know what careers a degree unlocks, what outcomes graduates achieve, and whether the investment makes sense before committing hundreds of thousands of dollars.
@LizAnnSonders@StrategasRP The no degree at all category is a bit misleading. Many of these CEOs still enrolled in college, built networks, developed skills, identified an opportunity, and then left to pursue it. That is different from never attending college at all and is crucial to note
Debt for education is only worthwhile if the path to your ultimate career requires it. A major with no clear return on that investment can leave students stuck in debt purgatory. The issue isn't college. The issue is entering college without a plan for how your degree translates into actual careers, compensation, and opportunities.
More clarity on the front end would reduce a lot of these numbers
Higher education is a huge investment. Knowing what path your degree actually leads to instead of blindly navigating four years of school is the key.
If high schoolers don't know what careers, opportunities, and outcomes their degree unlocks, then yeah, you're right, the degree can end up feeling pretty worthless.
There's a lot of pressure on higher ed right now with the rising costs and what many see as a depreciation in the value of a degree. Students and parents are starting to ask tougher questions about ROI, and honestly, they should.
@KevinSzabo14 Are there specific sectors you think will see more of a boom than others? Curious which areas AI ends up augmenting the most versus areas where it has more of a negative effect to people's labor
Feels like Moore’s law strikes again. Lower cost → more output → more demand. It sounds counterintuitive, but AI likely will expand the total amount of work rather than shrinking it in certain markets ( as seen here with Software Engineers). The real question is which roles expand vs get compressed. That’s what should drive how students think about majors and careers
It should though, right? Maybe if we actually prepared students for the careers and opportunities their majors can lead to, there would be better alignment between the two. A lot of this stems from students picking majors at 18 without fully understanding the career paths attached to them, then either switching majors multiple times or sticking it out and ending up unfulfilled.
When you mix AI uncertainty, students not knowing what careers actually exist or where majors lead, a changing economy, and technology slowly replacing real-world networking, this checks out. We ask 18-year-olds to make some of the biggest decisions of their lives with surprisingly little exposure to what the workforce actually looks like
Universities are sending students to tech-based job boards to find career opportunities, even though 60-80% of hires come through networking and
personal relationships