Hyper Calvinist Reformed Baptist, Jesus only awaits the repentant, not the prideful, Gender is biologically determined, "he" is also linguistically neutral.
It's strange being a brown woman in the VTubing community who values free speech. People expect me to think, act, and speak a certain way, and if I don't fit that expectation, they assume I'm lying about being brown. Then they demand I "prove" it by showing my face, as if that doesn't completely defeat the point of being a VTuber in the first place.
The @UnitedChurch of Christ blocked LifeNews after we exposed how it supports abortion.
You can't be a faithful Christian and support killing babies in abortions.
"Thou shalt not murder."
I recently spoke to a woman who works in marketing at a big five publishing house. She told me that her imprint represents zero conservative fiction authors.
Zero.
But a healthy literary culture should feature novels written by conservatives, liberals, Christians, atheists, feminists, socialists, traditionalists—and everyone in between.
Instead, we're getting an ideological monoculture.
@not__vee I think you confused evolutionary disgust and morality. The question was "why is it immoral" not "why does it gross you out". The gross out is actually central to the point.
@SilverHawk1997@not__vee I would diverge with the premise that kings didn't have a divine right, for Scripture says they were instituted by God as in Romans 13, but that they are not without reproach as ministers and servants of God, and thus can be challenged in violation. But yeah, unlike the pagans.
For starters. Celsus was an early Roman Philosopher and attacker of Christianity who mocked it by calling it a Religion for Women, Slaves and Children because it had a More Egalitarian view that effectively the Emperor was no greater than a Peasent under God.
Such statements were considered absurdities back then.
Even when the Church and Kings agreed to a divine right of kings.
This too was eventually overturned with the same logic. What divine right did kings have when all were equal under God?
@DanteB35353@not__vee This is a midwit take on the definition of objective morality, which you're wrong by the way, objective morality means you have an appeal to a higher authority which is not subjected to the whims of time.
@Rain_Rans@not__vee The foundation of Japanese behavior is religious, they're still a Shinto people, and they behave like it, they act out the theological premise of Shinto animism to this day, that's one of the reasons they are such a well respected people.
@not__vee Buddhism and Hinduism absolutely believe in an afterlife, often myriad numbers of them. Confuscionism still believes in a concept of divinity.
Atheism has no compelling answer to why inherent biological morality is important beyond its utility.
Which is a weak answer.
@TyTalks2020@not__vee That's not a justification for morality, that's an imposition of personal preference. "Terrible outcomes" is a subjectivist and relativist standard, its not wrong, just personally disliked by you.
@not__vee@MasterEnvi@jsnino2003@gurauki "However shiting on the streets is not written in the bible nad yet most cultures dont do it."
Wrong, see Deuteronomy 23:12-14.
@not__vee Atheism can only exist as consequence of robbing form the Christians, their morality, and their worldview, atheism is an inherently Christian robbery, it cannot exist in Buddhism, Hinduism, Islam, or Pagan origin, aside from the fact they explicitly kill those who reject the gods
@not__vee "There is no society on earth that considered what it was doing 300 years ago to be immoral."
When you lack a foundation for morality, sure, that doesn't refute objective morality, that just refutes subjective morality like you have.
@not__vee "Just because I can trace where the morality comes from and what triggers it doesnt make the imoral act less imoral."
Without an authority to define that morality, there is nothing immoral.