Respectfully?
The line *opinions may be subjective and state OP’s likes/dislikes.
This assigns horrific designations to the rest, adding an element of fear if you disagree, lest you be labelled those bad things.
Can we go at people causing the harm, vs art some think is icky?
You can dislike someone's kink, art style, or fursona without inventing a criminal accusation to justify disliking them. Jesus Christ it’s been 30 years of the same arguments with no consensus but people like to pretend there is.
Respectfully?
The line *opinions may be subjective and state OP’s likes/dislikes.
This assigns horrific designations to the rest, adding an element of fear if you disagree, lest you be labelled those bad things.
Can we go at people causing the harm, vs art some think is icky?
The lysine attachment and needing first pass metabolism to work does not fool the marquis regent test for Vyvanse. Comes up as a strong amphetamine. Keep that stuff in your prescription bottles at all times!
@RhapsodyBarks *pushes up against a post* hello ms. Coyote… *presses noses* Aren’t you the cutest little thing ! I’m Spazz by the way *wag*
Like this??
@soshi42018 Yes! But sadly we take anything in a docx format as evidence now. Stuff a court or even an evidentiary panel that accepts corroborated heresy would laugh at what some here accept as evidence.
You can dislike someone's kink, art style, or fursona without inventing a criminal accusation to justify disliking them. Jesus Christ it’s been 30 years of the same arguments with no consensus but people like to pretend there is.
@LoloFennec The topic itself isn’t even the real issue. If the OP landed squarely where I do on opinion, they are still wrong.
The real issue is the silence of their peers (or even later generations) who have their own thoughts and opinions too, but no longer participate because of fear.
@LoloFennec Oh and I agree. There’s no way she doesn’t know she hit SOMETHING at minimum. And if you don’t know what that was (like a pylon), you freaking stop to check.
Imagine advocating evidence-based public safety then dismissing the concerns of professionals responsible for implementing the policy. Canadian Association of Chiefs of Police raised valid questions about workload, priorities and implementation. But those concerns don’t matter?
[EDITORIAL @globeandmail re #TumblerRidge investigation]: "This is a problem that goes beyond the police. Too often in Canada, the default assumption among officials is that the public has no right to know. .. Because of the importance of law enforcement and the justice system – which are crucial both to public safety and to the public’s perception of safety – secrecy from them has a particularly corrosive effect. .. The person charged in the US reported that Rootselaar claimed to have stolen firearms from the family gun safe, convinced someone to buy ammunition for them and possessed a device that US police believed would convert a rifle into a machine gun. 𝗪𝗵𝘆 𝗱𝗼𝗲𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗺𝗮𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿? 𝗔𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗺𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝗯𝗮𝘀𝗶𝗰, 𝗶𝘁 𝗺𝗮𝘆 𝗿𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗮𝗹 𝗴𝗮𝗽𝘀 𝗶𝗻 𝗖𝗮𝗻𝗮𝗱𝗮’𝘀 𝗴𝘂𝗻-𝘀𝗮𝗳𝗲𝘁𝘆 𝗿𝗲𝗴𝗶𝗺𝗲. .. The principle of 'need to know' is common in security and intelligence jobs. This limits information to those who require it. But officials must remember that the public is not party to any such policy. The public has a default right to know – that’s fundamental to a free and open society."
https://t.co/a6JUqGstpM
Step 1: tell Canadians public safety is the priority
Step 2: spend hundreds of millions on a firearms compensation program
Step 3: have police leadership question the operational priority
Step 4: insist questioning the program means opposing public safety
Did I miss a step?
[EDITORIAL @globeandmail re #TumblerRidge investigation]: "This is a problem that goes beyond the police. Too often in Canada, the default assumption among officials is that the public has no right to know. .. Because of the importance of law enforcement and the justice system – which are crucial both to public safety and to the public’s perception of safety – secrecy from them has a particularly corrosive effect. .. The person charged in the US reported that Rootselaar claimed to have stolen firearms from the family gun safe, convinced someone to buy ammunition for them and possessed a device that US police believed would convert a rifle into a machine gun. 𝗪𝗵𝘆 𝗱𝗼𝗲𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗺𝗮𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿? 𝗔𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗺𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝗯𝗮𝘀𝗶𝗰, 𝗶𝘁 𝗺𝗮𝘆 𝗿𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗮𝗹 𝗴𝗮𝗽𝘀 𝗶𝗻 𝗖𝗮𝗻𝗮𝗱𝗮’𝘀 𝗴𝘂𝗻-𝘀𝗮𝗳𝗲𝘁𝘆 𝗿𝗲𝗴𝗶𝗺𝗲. .. The principle of 'need to know' is common in security and intelligence jobs. This limits information to those who require it. But officials must remember that the public is not party to any such policy. The public has a default right to know – that’s fundamental to a free and open society."
https://t.co/a6JUqGstpM