Thank you, sir for once again defending your precious island. We will never surrender as we fight the enemies foreign and domestic within our midst. God bless you. 🙏🏻❤️🇬🇧🌺
PC Nicky Vernon suffered a fractured spine and punctured lung after BLM protesters directed flares at her horse. No one was ever charged – and now we know why. A leaked memo confirms that two-tier policing was in play, says Hugo Timms
https://t.co/orBPECEZt1
A man in Marseille, France’s second largest city, shows the situation in his neighborhood after North Africans started moving in.
“They throw all their garbage out of their windows. We are living in literal shit. We never asked for this.”
No one should have to live like this.
In an increasingly multicultural society, declining trust and demographic competition drive people to organize into ethnos blocs that outcoordinate atomized individuals and turn politics into a struggle over resources and state power. As those blocs harden, the state increasingly governs the resulting instability through authoritarian, technocratic means, making the future ethnos below and technocracy above.
Blank-slate universalism was never a durable operating system. It was an ideological luxury sustained by states already bound by a dominant historical ethnos, inherited norms, and deep reserves of common trust. Multiculturalism consumes that inheritance while denying it was ever necessary. As ethnic heterogeneity rises, generalized trust erodes, civic solidarity thins, and people sort into blocs that supply identity, protection, and reciprocal obligation. As universal institutions lose credibility, obligation retreats to groups whose members can reward loyalty and punish defection. The common society recedes; the in-group becomes the decisive political unit.
Ethnos blocs possess dense networks, internal discipline, and the power to coordinate turnout, institutional pressure, and social sanctions. Atomized individuals cannot match that unity. They are fragmented, cross-pressured, and easily outorganized. Public choice accelerates the process. Each bloc captures concentrated benefits while dispersing costs across everyone else. The state adapts by distributing appointments, exemptions, selective enforcement, and legitimacy through recognized groups. Appear as a bloc or forfeit the seat.
Heterogeneity reorganizes political life around group competition. Elections become demographic contests. Appointments become ethnic allocations. Policy transfers status and resources among blocs. Political defeat becomes collective dispossession; institutional control becomes group security. Ethnicity becomes the currency of collective power. Individualists must accept political irrelevance or become a counter-bloc. Once every population must form a bloc to survive politically, the creedal order has died.
Lee Kuan Yew understood the regime consequence. A deeply plural society cannot be governed by sentimental assumptions of spontaneous cohesion and procedural neutrality. When communal blocs compete through the state, it must manage them from above through housing policy, administrative allocation, surveillance, and speech controls. In the contemporary West, this machinery is increasingly digital: data collection, algorithmic monitoring, platform control, and behavioral regulation.
Multiculturalism hardens ethnos below while building technocratic authoritarianism above. The less a population can govern itself through common trust, the more coercion the state needs to hold it together. In an increasingly multicultural society, the future is ethnos, and the government of ethnos is technocracy.
This is how the Christian majority in Lebanon came to an end.
“Lebanon was the only Christian country in the Middle East, and also the only one to accept Palestinian refugees.
Lebanon had an open border policy. We wanted to share our knowledge with our Muslim neighbors. But when they became the majority, they started slaughtering the Christians who welcomed them.”
Pay close attention!
We gave France hundreds of millions to "stop the boats" and video shows French police on the beach literally pointing them in the direction of where to wait for the boats.
X: @PrisonPlanet
Full video: https://t.co/DV7WjEH7d6
It should not, however, be a criminal offence.
Where would that end?
Lots of words can be very offensive to lots of people?
So is it only one word that we should criminalize?
Suppress and takeover village by village, town by town, City by City then Country by Country! Piddington. Defend yourselves at all costs. Community patrols with a zero tolerance approach! 💪🏼👊🏼🏴
While Andy Burhnham distracts you with Tiktoks about crisps, to a fawning media establishment, he is quietly briefing the Guardian that he will U-turn on the retrospective reforms to Indefinite Leave to Remain.
This will mean the WHOLE Boriswave of 4 million non-EU unskilled migrants will get to stay and get lifetime access to our welfare state in the next few years.
Do you understand what’s happening?
@SquawkCNBC@TheEconomist@zannymb@elonmusk She doesn’t seem to give a sh*t about multi-billionaire Soros and his massive interference in every election he can get his hands on.
Shame on YOU for being so stupid.
We’re talking about MASSIVE NUMBERS of illegal aliens that should never have been allowed to get close to the shores of Britain. Numbers that are being added to every day. Numbers so unprecedented that it will destroy the society that the British have built over centuries.
This is UNACCEPTABLE.
Do you really not understand the difference between controlled immigration (who, from where, and how many) and unwanted mass migration???
or are you just lying?
Hi,
I’m glad you have the honesty to admit your feelings on the neo-Economist. Although it’s much worse than mediocre.
If you’re not a fan of Elon Musk then I would hope that you don’t own a Starlink, a Tesla, or ever benefit in any way from the improvements to mankind brought about by the projects of Space X, The Boring Company, Nueralink, or any of the other many technologies his endeavours have given us.
Sincerely,
SpeakNow
It’s beyond the word “irresponsible” for a purported news magazine to downplay, dismiss or ignore the reality of what’s happening to the nation it supposedly serves.
People like Zanny Minton Beddoes are loathsome.
How does a country make itself safe and productive?
Great Britain did it with Christianity—and by executing or imprisoning the worst males in every generation for hundreds of years.
By the 1960s, the country was so civilized that policeman carried nothing but a nightstick, everybody queued without a second thought, and newspaper boxes were left unlocked on the high street.
Britain had become a so-called high trust society — less euphemistically, an honest society.
Something similar—without the Christianity—transpired in Japan.
What happens to such a country if it forgets how difficult that was to attain?
The Brits found out. And then denied it.
https://t.co/xbdCHNknd3
@HJB_News__ The Tories are finished. Nobody trusts them anymore, for good reason.
There’s no question that both Reform and Restore would also scrap this insane nonsense.
The power mad globalist governments AND the anti-British globalists who’ve taken over the legacy media and press.
They work in concert to ignore you or worse: to displace or replace you with foreigners who they think are better than you and who they believe will be eternally grateful to them (ha!).
Elon Musk just gave a tiny Oxfordshire village a global megaphone.
Thank you, @elonmusk.
Piddington may be little — but we will not be ignored.
When ordinary communities believe government has stopped listening, they have two choices: accept it or stand up and be heard.
We chose to ROAR. 🐻🇬🇧
From one small Plucky Little English Village to the world:
LISTEN TO PIDDINGTON.
#Piddington #VillageThatRoars
Yes we’ve watched it, and “Zanny’s” nauseating self-righteousness.
“People loathe you” she says in a disdainful tone. Only her girlfriends, their trans kids, and the emasculated men they feel able to keep under control perhaps loathe him.
Normal people with minds of their own and common sense admire him greatly.
But we can easily derive what The Economist thinks of normal people.
“Zanny” thinks that there’s nothing to worry about crime-wise in Britain. She uses the false comparison to “American cities” (which ones?) instead of comparing it in proper terms - with Britain itself 10, 20, 30 years ago.
How do you think it would square up then, Zanny?
Musk is correct, and the poll numbers prove, that we loathe you, the legacy media, your approval of censorship of the common man and your degradation of freedom of speech (especially when it comes to the greatest platform for free speech: X). But most of all for your utilization of leftist-globalist propaganda and the lies of omission that try to obfuscate what the common man and woman sees every day all around them.
All this while masquerading as “journalism”.