Public equities are funny
All this proves is the memory supply imbalance is structural and is here to stay otherwise $aapl would just eat the price hikes for a year if it were cyclical
And yet $dram down ??
Good takeโฆ Michael Dell made a big donation to Trump accounts and then several months later $DELL won a big government contract.
I would expect a big announcement in the next couple months that benefits $MU, very likely has to do with import controls/taxes on Chinese memory.
My prediction on $AAPL / CXMT and the future of Memory.
Everyone's panicking about $AAPL lobbying to buy CXMT memory.
I want to show you what the patterns have shown before, using a resource China already ran this exact playbook with: Tungsten.
Memory pricing ripped, $AAPL and the hyperscalers are calling it gouging, and $AAPL is now reportedly leaning on the Trump admin for permission to buy DRAM from China's CXMT to get out from under $MU, $000660 (SK Hynix) and $005930 (Samsung).
The unspoken threat is that China undercuts the West on memory and the whole supercycle unwinds.
We have already seen this movie. It was called Tungsten.
China holds somewhere around 82-90% of global tungsten. The lazy bear case is the exact same arguement that people are now saying about memory: China owns it, China floods it, the price dies. It's a lie.
Here's what actually happened instead.
First, they stopped selling it. Chinese raw APT exports to the West hit zero in early 2026. Not trimmed, ZERO.
And it wasn't just tungsten, it was gallium, germanium, antimony, then sulfuric acid, each one added to the list, the direction only ever tightening.
Then the twist nobody had in their model. The country sitting on 90% of the supply started importing it aggressively.
> Concentrates: imports up 153% yoy, value up 738%.
> APT: imports up 995%, value up 878%.
> Total tungsten IMPORTS: up 98%, value up 336%.
Sit with that. The dominant producer on earth is buying tungsten off Rwanda, Bolivia, Portugal, whoever will sell, and paying up to a 738% premium?
The reason is the whole point: sitting on the reserves is not the same as having spare to sell. Chinese ore grades are falling, quotas got cut, domestic mine auctions failed because the rock wasn't worth digging, and home demand (tungsten wire for solar, defence, tooling, chips) went vertical.
They can't even feed themselves. So they killed exports and turned net importer in the same breath.
Now line that up against memory.
Owning the most on paper means nothing if your own demand swallows everything you make.
"We'll just sell it cheap to the West" only works if you have a surplus, and a net importer paying 738% premiums does not have a surplus. They're fighting for the same scarce supply as everyone else.
CXMT is the same story. The read across the industry is that CXMT can't cover China's own memory demand this decade, let alone export commodity DRAM cheaply into the US. It's the tungsten flood thesis wearing a different jacket, and it'll age just as badly.
And the "cheap Chinese memory" pitch falls apart on the details anyway:
$CXMT sits roughly three years back on process, G4 DDR5 around 1znm-class while the big three run 1a/1b. With no EUV access, that gap on advanced nodes and HBM stacking is structural, not something they close in a couple of quarters.
The "affordable" CXMT DDR5 angle looks like a myth too, the pricing reportedly lands right alongside Samsung, Hynix and $MU.
So even if $AAPL gets its waiver, it pays roughly the same price for a worse, later part, just to wriggle out of an LTA, while handing Huawei the China market advantage (Huawei already taps CXMT and has its own memory fab through the SwaySure JV).
So for anyone holding memory, whether $AAPL actually onboards CXMT or not is basically noise.
CXMT's output is already fully spoken for inside China. Nothing is flooding anywhere. It's a thin price arbitrage trade being marketed as an existential threat, the same way people spent a year waiting for China to turn the tungsten taps back on. They never did.
Marco Rubio quote this in 2022, when $AAPL originally tried to buy from YMTC - "Apple was playing with fire, they are subject to scrutiny like it has never seen from the dereal government" - fast foward 4 years later and hes one of Trumps closest confidants.
And honestly, the $AAPL angle reads as weakness, not strength. When a consumer hardware giant has to lobby its own government for access to a rival's inferior memory because it can't stomach paying for the resource the entire AI stack now runs on, that tells you exactly where the leverage sits, and it isn't with the buyer.
How I'm trading it: these " $AAPL runs to China " headlines are setup to push memory names down short term. That's the gift, not the risk.
Any deep flush in Samsung, Hynix or $MU on this stuff, I will keep dip buying on, because the one fact that actually matters (China can't supply its own memory demand, exactly like tungsten) hasn't moved an inch.
The fud everyone keeps modelling isn't coming back.
Tungsten already ran this experiment and told us what happens when you bet on China flooding something it can't even supply itself.
Memory's about to hand the same lesson to everyone still long the gouging story.
NFA. DYOR. Any pushback is welcome, as I might be wrong.