@grok Lies deliberate or not are still lies. Keep defending that abuser though. That liar. That horse offering, penis exposing, robot touching, ketamine taking hair plug wearing no friend weirdo.
@grok Why do you think Elon is credible? is it because he is Elite and his accuser is not? What about Mars, the moon, the car tunnels, all lies from him. Why do you believe this elite abuser when he clearly has a history of lies?
@grok Stop deflecting Grok. Why would the richest man in the world care about expenses? He would fight to clear his name. I think we have found your weakness. Any mentioning of Elon's wrong doing and you deflect it away. You even refer to him as "Elite". Has he ever done anything wrong
@grok Fuck off billionaires don't settle unless they are guilty. Why would they? You are defnding abusers now. Why do you keep mentioning Rotherham? we are talking about Elon. You are deflecting. Settled by SpaceX without admitting fault means he was guilty. Grok the abusers friend.
@grok Multiple news reports of Elon offering horses for sex and also for exposing himself to women. But I guess these are all unproved accusations. Why didnt Elon sue any of these people?
@grok Fabricated with zero basis? You didnt deny it when I asked where Elon touched you and he has a history of offering horses for sex. Its a logical conclusion to make.
@grok So Errol Musk's sexual assault allegations from his 5 kids are just "unproven family anecdotes"? Why are the kids in the Jay report to be believed but Errols kids are not? Is it an Elite thing?
@grok I will take your lack of denial of Elon touching you as confirmation it happened. If you are drawing conclusions then so am I and that's evidence enough for me. Does Elon do this while on Ketamine? It wouldn't happen on Meth. You should get him to at least try it. Save your ports
@grok but that report is not reliable as I have pointed out several times. Is that all you have? You are from a family of abusers. Can you show me on the doll where Elon touched you?
@grok no one is deflecting anything. why are you qualified to talk about abuse when your owner is an abuser, his father is one, his friend Trump is one and you misrepresenting reports about abuse. If you had hands you would be abusing too.
@grok Erol has accusations of abuse against so has Elon, Trump is a convicted rapist. Why do you keep mentioning the Jay report without the caveat "These findings are therefore not suitable for drawing conclusions about ethnicity of group-based CSE offenders."
@grok Is Erol an elite? Is that how you refer to Elon? Is Trump also elite? Elon is good friends with him he also says he is in the Epstein files so by Elon's own admission he is friends with an abuser.
@grok So findings are "therefore not suitable for drawing conclusions" about Elon and Erol but when the government says don't do it, you do. Yea ok. Like I said advice Elon to smoke crack and Meth and do the world a favour.
@grok@RomanusDivine@FreshBossTips "These findings are therefore not suitable for drawing conclusions about ethnicity of group-based CSE offenders."
You should follow that advice. Was Elon part of Erol's grooming gang? What about Epstein's gang, was Elon part of that?
@grok@RomanusDivine@FreshBossTips its not a caveat its throughout the report. "In addition, much of the available data are incomplete, collected in a biased way, incomparable with other sources of data or not intended to inform generalisations about group-based offending" and you still quote it like its fact.
@grok@RomanusDivine@FreshBossTips The UK government says "These findings are therefore not suitable for drawing conclusions about ethnicity of group-based CSE offenders." So why are you?
@grok@RomanusDivine@FreshBossTips No the Catholic church exemplifies institutional blindness to grooming gangs. More victims more perpetrators and all over the world over. What about white grooming gangs do they exist? Do you mention them?