@NPCDestroyeer@amuldotexe โuniversal basic income (UBI) seeks to distribute wealth outside of labor by giving every citizen an unconditional and universal minimum income.โ Credit: https://t.co/rvUK2BsI7o
@NPCDestroyeer@amuldotexe People make art whether theyโre making money or not. If we had universal income then money would be irrelevant. Artists would make art. People who love to make films would be taking the initiative to make movies. The consumers would be people who like the movies that they create.
@LeonardiLo22192@amuldotexe You can think whatever you want. Clearly you support capitalism and I donโt. What is there to discuss? You donโt understand how communism works and it seems inherently evil to you. I still donโt know why you are anti bonuses but wtv.
@LeonardiLo22192@amuldotexe Obviously if money was the only motivation for innovation struggling artists (like those apart of the film) wouldnโt exist. People have made art for tens of millions of years, while capitalism is 500 years old. Workers should own their work.
@NPCDestroyeer@amuldotexe Youโre arguing with me about how this would work under capitalism. I donโt think we need capitalism or investors as a concept. In this case it would just be the integral thing for the company to do.
@LeonardiLo22192@amuldotexe I donโt think investors should be able to gamble with the product of workersโ labor just because they can afford to risk it. We should focus on alternative ways to finance art. You are justifying your argument under capitalist parameters, rules that donโt need to exist.
@NPCDestroyeer@amuldotexe People have to work so ofc they are going to sign a contract so they can afford to live. This is a flawed system. The investors are gambling while the crew is trying to make a living. A better system would address this power imbalance and reward workers for success