@w1ndAster@JackysCornField I feel that its poor to support someone when all the evidence from both sides are terribly unreliable. Both sides exclude information that the other side mentions, and when a case that holds serious weight is brought to question, jumping the gun only leads to more harm than good.
@shlumver@FlowerOfFuji@JackysCornField I totally understand this view and get how lack of action can indeed make things worse. However, both narrators are unreliable, excluding information from their documents, and support bases are only blurring the issue even more, making a concrete decision difficult to make.
@FlowerOfFuji@JackysCornField I'm not saying that anyones NOT a victim, or that I don't believe her. However, I do believe that it's important to verify all claims from all sides before making an educated decision on who to support though, and this comes with time. The blind should not lead the blind.
@FlowerOfFuji@JackysCornField Im not exactly sure why targeting people who don't want to choose a side or are waiting for more information seems like a good idea to you. It's all too often that cases are brought up like their where either which side could be lying, and I believe that waiting helps to clarify.