Our 2026 midterms model is out and will be hosted at @TheArgumentMag.
Projections as of 6/19:
House: 🟦 85% (229D-206R)
Senate: 🟥 57% (50R-50D)
https://t.co/cm3ZZ9Is6q
The final @SplitTicket_/@TheArgumentMag model update, run with today's polls.
Senate: 53D-47R (77% 🟦)
House: 239D-196R (92% 🟦)
The data unambiguously says something. It's just that nobody seems to actually believe it. We'll see if that's warranted.
https://t.co/w6EmyZoWmu
As we've previously written, candidate quality and national environment can have substantial impacts on any given candidate's performance.
This year, with two states bidding farewell to incumbents, it's time to consider how incumbent party fatigue can help the "out" party.
Deconstructing our Wins Above Replacement model and explaining how it works, for all curious. (And why progressives don’t do as well in it)
https://t.co/sgFd3ZWlNl
With the House up for grabs in 2026, candidate quality could be decisive. Both parties face challenges, but strong recruits may tip the balance in key races:
https://t.co/6dybDB8IMf
For our last piece with @PostOpinions, we take a look at how the Democratic Party’s base has changed since 2016 — and in area after area, the party’s voters have become more liberal across the board, even though its leadership has not always agreed. https://t.co/vdOrhLbNzL
The Texas GOP is set to use an old trick: redrawing Democratic-held congressional districts mid-decade. With Trump urging action, legislators could redraw 2–5 seats—echoing the 2003 playbook and potentially changing the 2026 House calculus. Read more here: https://t.co/JrIe9L6urv
Six House Democrats in New England significantly outperformed Kamala Harris with low-propensity voters. Their edge? Moderate, bipartisan profiles—centrist voting records that resonated in crossover districts in an age of brutal polarization. https://t.co/ablALmrWmI
The real reason Democrats can't compete for 60 Senate seats isn't just the "structural bias of the Senate". It's because ticket splitting collapsed over the last decade. Using our WAR models, we can show how the impact of candidate quality has plummeted.
https://t.co/o88kiOYrt0
Today, Split Ticket is releasing a brand new set of Wins Above Replacement models, this time for the 2016 cycle. Our hope is that political observers can benefit from this new dataset to better understand candidate quality.
We'll have a more detailed analysis up soon.
Finally, a full, downloadable candidate quality database can be found here. This contains five cycles of data, from 2016-2024. To download it, click "Get The Data" on desktop. https://t.co/HzxgkGOOvR