丂卩ㄖㄖҜㄚ

Automated futures trader. Will call out the industry bullshit.

Building tradestar.

[丂卩ㄖㄖҜㄚ @SpookyQuant]

@Polymarket Governments successfully isolating every single person, making them poorer than ever and arresting anyone with a strong unaligned view.

[丂卩ㄖㄖҜㄚ @SpookyQuant]

@SulliGK09 Well done. About time we grew a backbone collectively and said enough.

[丂卩ㄖㄖҜㄚ @SpookyQuant]

@tradertheory * add more accounts *

[丂卩ㄖㄖҜㄚ @SpookyQuant]

@bonehn Yes mate, completely. Its not just about automating though, decorrelation for drawdown optimisation too, so we can mathematically shorten days to earn with volume without negatively impacting drawdown, but increasing profit.

[丂卩ㄖㄖҜㄚ @SpookyQuant]

Well, not my best month...one of my worst actually but still closing out strong atleast.

Feel free to share yours below and lemme know if you had a good month.

[丂卩ㄖㄖҜㄚ @SpookyQuant]

This afternoon was kind...thanks #NQ

[丂卩ㄖㄖҜㄚ @SpookyQuant]

@marktradewinst @JKBTrades_ You might be interested in this - I dont think Tradezellas edge is fake, but with the rules I set, which fit their description, it came out completely opposite.

https://t.co/557QrG1M4D

[丂卩ㄖㄖҜㄚ @SpookyQuant]

@TradeZella good post. Piqued my interest so figured I'd give it a go to see if I could replicate the results.

I took the Asian range raid setup and made a fully automated version so I could backtest it properly on MNQ 5min.

Your thread gives the core idea but a few things needed defining to remove discretion.

Exact Asian session times, what counts as a valid sweep, and especially how to mark the CHoCH.

CHoCH is subjective in ICT depending on which swings you pick.

I locked it down with strict rules:

☑️Asian session 22:00-04:00
☑️Sweep = breaks the high then closes back inside
☑️CHoCH = closes below the most recent swing low after the sweep, enter on that close
☑️SL just above the sweep high
☑️TP at the Asian low
☑️Same rules mirrored for longs
☑️No extra filters

Ran it and got this:

-Profit factor 0.58
-31 wins / 62 losses
-33% win rate
-net loss roughly 12k

The bare mechanical version is thin.

Probably the edge in the original test sits in the discretionary calls or needs extra filters on top.

Appreciate you putting the idea out there but was unable to replicate.

Curious what exact rules your engine used for the sweep and CHoCH, if you can share further details I'd be happy to re-run and re-share my findings.

[丂卩ㄖㄖҜㄚ @SpookyQuant]

@JKBTrades_ Hey, if you're good as a discretionary trader, stick at it, I wasn't so found something more my groove. Entering peak autism flow state ;) ha

[丂卩ㄖㄖҜㄚ @SpookyQuant]

@JKBTrades_ No - and thats generally why i like it, zero subjectivity, but it does rule out A LOT of strategies.

[丂卩ㄖㄖҜㄚ @SpookyQuant]

@JKBTrades_ Ha, you mentioned discretion, so it seems unlikely, but always fun to see.

[丂卩ㄖㄖҜㄚ @SpookyQuant]

@JKBTrades_ Good to know, and thanks for confirming. Will have a crack at it.

[丂卩ㄖㄖҜㄚ @SpookyQuant]

@salmanmunir96 @tradeifycrypto @breakoutprop Prop firms live in the "gotchya" land. Its just part of the game.

They simply do not want traders to win, that's their entire business model. They want the eval fee and nothing more.

[丂卩ㄖㄖҜㄚ @SpookyQuant]

@NoContextHumans Lol now imagine the outrage if the man did this.

[丂卩ㄖㄖҜㄚ @SpookyQuant]

@tradericch Ah I remember having to deal with all this shit haha.

[丂卩ㄖㄖҜㄚ @SpookyQuant]

Fine tuning the setups for next week and rolling out a couple of new strategies.

Always tweaking, always testing.

How’s your Sunday going?

#daytrading #nq #es #futures #FuturesBot

[丂卩ㄖㄖҜㄚ @SpookyQuant]

My own recent experience of tradeify doesn't match the high standards you're claiming @GandalfTrader

Ongoing issues for ~3 weeks. Ticket keeps being closed by the same guy. Have sent video footage of the issue, tried multiple paths to get help on what should be a trivial issue.

[丂卩ㄖㄖҜㄚ @SpookyQuant]

@trades_sage What was the actual point of the expo?

[丂卩ㄖㄖҜㄚ @SpookyQuant]

You have to wonder WHY specifically they would do this.

I don't agree with criminalising those less fortunate, but this also opens up more corridors for the so called immigrants to just setup shop in public areas, with zero powers to move them on.

Ideally an update would be that there is no criminalising, but that police how stronger powers to move these on and ensure they are fed into the appropriate care system, be that emergency housing or deportation.

[丂卩ㄖㄖҜㄚ @SpookyQuant]

I tested the Asian Range Raid setup mechanically.

@TradeZella posted a strategy that turned $50k into $149k with a 6.99 profit factor.

Looked interesting, so I automated it properly and backtested it on MNQ.

Strict rules. No extra filters. No discretion.

Result: Profit factor 0.58, 33% win rate, and a net loss.

The bare mechanical version didn’t hold up.

The edge in the original results is likely coming from discretionary decisions or additional filters that weren’t shown.

#daytrading #tradezella #nq #es #spy #qqq #futures #ai

[丂卩ㄖㄖҜㄚ @SpookyQuant]

@TradeZella good post. Piqued my interest so figured I'd give it a go to see if I could replicate the results.

I took the Asian range raid setup and made a fully automated version so I could backtest it properly on MNQ 5min.

Your thread gives the core idea but a few things needed defining to remove discretion.

Exact Asian session times, what counts as a valid sweep, and especially how to mark the CHoCH.

CHoCH is subjective in ICT depending on which swings you pick.

I locked it down with strict rules:

☑️Asian session 22:00-04:00
☑️Sweep = breaks the high then closes back inside
☑️CHoCH = closes below the most recent swing low after the sweep, enter on that close
☑️SL just above the sweep high
☑️TP at the Asian low
☑️Same rules mirrored for longs
☑️No extra filters

Ran it and got this:

-Profit factor 0.58
-31 wins / 62 losses
-33% win rate
-net loss roughly 12k

The bare mechanical version is thin.

Probably the edge in the original test sits in the discretionary calls or needs extra filters on top.

Appreciate you putting the idea out there but was unable to replicate.

Curious what exact rules your engine used for the sweep and CHoCH, if you can share further details I'd be happy to re-run and re-share my findings.

[丂卩ㄖㄖҜㄚ @SpookyQuant]

@TradeZella good post. Piqued my interest so figured I'd give it a go to see if I could replicate the results.

I took the Asian range raid setup and made a fully automated version so I could backtest it properly on MNQ 5min.

Your thread gives the core idea but a few things needed defining to remove discretion.

Exact Asian session times, what counts as a valid sweep, and especially how to mark the CHoCH.

CHoCH is subjective in ICT depending on which swings you pick.

I locked it down with strict rules:

☑️Asian session 22:00-04:00
☑️Sweep = breaks the high then closes back inside
☑️CHoCH = closes below the most recent swing low after the sweep, enter on that close
☑️SL just above the sweep high
☑️TP at the Asian low
☑️Same rules mirrored for longs
☑️No extra filters

Ran it and got this:

-Profit factor 0.58
-31 wins / 62 losses
-33% win rate
-net loss roughly 12k

The bare mechanical version is thin.

Probably the edge in the original test sits in the discretionary calls or needs extra filters on top.

Appreciate you putting the idea out there but was unable to replicate.

Curious what exact rules your engine used for the sweep and CHoCH, if you can share further details I'd be happy to re-run and re-share my findings.

[丂卩ㄖㄖҜㄚ @SpookyQuant]

@NoLimitGains Pretty hard to leave. It aint free. Aside from leaving family and friends, there isnt a close alrernative. Europe is basically the same.