@carstendog I think she (potentially) has a genuine disability. I have tried to explain many things to her before. I started to feel bad for calling her a retard.
The spin just got shredded.
RBA Governor Michele Bullock hiked rates to 4.6%, a 15 year high, and then refused to play Albanese and Chalmers’ blame game.
She said it straight:
“Inflation is too high and has been driven by domestic capacity pressures, the inflation impulse from the Middle East conflict is in addition to this, domestic spending and investment have been stronger than expected”
Then the killer line:
“The bottom line is that productivity is doing nothing”
Labor’s entire script collapsed in one press conference.
Albanese spent the morning blaming Morrison, Frydenberg, Putin and Trump.
Chalmers said “Middle East” ten times in 20 minutes and claimed the RBA statement made it “abundantly clear” that international factors were the driver.
Bullock said the opposite.
Domestic demand is too hot, supply isn’t growing, productivity is dead and extra government spending is making it worse.
Handouts, tax cuts, free TAFE and bulk billing announcements are not an economic strategy.
They are demand stimulus in an economy that already has excess demand. That is why mortgage holders are copping another hike and why more could still come.
The time for talking points is over.
Cut the spending. Fix productivity.
Stop pretending wars overseas explain a homegrown mess.
TRANSLATION:
Today, I had a productive call with Japanese Finance Minister Satsuki Katayama.
Our partnership remains strongest when Japan is stable, cooperative, and understands that some assets are technically theirs and strategically ours
We discussed not getting any fucking ideas about selling anything important.
No, I'm not Jimmy. But you have never studied logic so you literally do not know what you're talking about. I can help, though.
Logic is propositional and works through inferential force.
For example, if we take a classic syllogism such as:
If it is cloudy outside, it will rain
It is cloudy outside,
Therefore, it will rain.
This is an argument that completes using modus ponens as the inferential principle. We call it deductive reasoning (the conclusion is logically entailed within the premises).
Do you see how this doesn't apply to a description of an ethnic group?
Illogical means logic that doesnt follow.
I have not laid out a syllogism and am not using inferential principles to arrive at a conclusion.
I am describing something about reality. I am making an empirical descriptive claim.
The appropriate question is whether the claim is true, well-defined, and supported by evidence, rather than whether it constitutes a valid deductive inference.
I know you won't understand the difference here. Maybe get whoever writes your videos to explain it to you, retard.