@UK_Daniel_Card The guy's response after she dismissed him is cringe but he was talking about zero trust architecture. So pretty cringe interaction from both.
@dman4835@JameelJaffer Unions very much do have the same ability. A company cannot prevent union related messages on company property like messages boards (physical and digital).
@dman4835@JameelJaffer There have been first amendment challenges to NLRA/NLRB. Forcing an employer to allow unions or union workers is compelling speech in the same way as stopping a social media company from banning users. More so social media companies operate like privately owned public spaces.
@JameelJaffer Honest question what's the difference here and with NLRA/NLRB? Both seem to uphold an individual's right to free speech over an organization's right to limit it.
@kurtopsahl Which right is greater an individuals right to free speech or an organization's rights to limit speech? Under the same principle is NRLB not compelling speech?
@troyhunt WeChat has been doing that with foreign accounts for years. If I need WeChat I basically have to make a new account each time. Which itself becomes a hassle each time.
@JaumeTeixi@robertgraham Just want to point out the paradox doesn't mean society must censor. It only means people should voice their intolerance. In the case of using censorship it actually fuels the persecuted mentality and can actually make things worse.
@DoorDash_Help No thanks, I tried via in app support and got nothing but the standard missing order treatment. If you don't care enough to take care of it via your official support channel there is no point to trying outside that channel.
@Zovanget@TheFeeneyFactor@litcapital Maybe not, I've seen SaaS companies outsource their website and all it's non-SaaS related pages to small companies.
Applications are open for FIREโs 2022 Free Inquiry Grant program.
The program will offer ๐ฅ $150,000 ๐ฅ to support research on free speech!
For more information on the program and eligibility please visit:
https://t.co/wUw8fpwk19