@ALeftyLawy@MrHarryCole A lot of competition, but you get the award for Wednesday, as I’ve limited myself to one retweet of this per day.
The prize is I get to mute you.
https://t.co/yZYuOV6P29
I verified this and it’s true
“Germany can no longer raise an army, simply because of how many Muslims are now German citizens”
“Now, allegedly, and I will say allegedly here, Germany's Chancellor Friedrich Merz has privately admitted that he's worried about the country's ability to raise an army, simply because Germany doesn't want to put weapons in the hands of hundreds of thousands of Muslim Germans.
And he'd be right in worrying, because a recent study of young Muslim Germans showed that nearly half expressed latent Islamist attitudes, which are, you know, the kind of attitudes that turn Muslims into terrorists, and more than half said that their religious commandments were more important to them than even German democracy.
And if you ask me, these don't sound like the attitudes of Germans. These sound like the attitudes of Germany's enemies”
Let’s get into the facts
A 2025–2026 German government-backed study by MOTRA, Radicalization Monitoring System, involving the Federal Criminal Police Office, found that 45.1% of Muslims under 40 in Germany hold either “manifest” (11.5%) or “latent” (33.6%) Islamist attitudes.
This includes preferences for Sharia over the constitution, antisemitic views, and Islamist leanings
Tucker Carlson also reported on this
When you have a significant population of Muslims who hold a pro-Sharia Law mindset, you can’t trust them in your military
I haven’t commuted into central London for a few weeks so managed to somewhat forget how radicalising an experience it can be. On both trains this AM I was the only Briton - it was not like this pre-2020.
A man was smoking a spliff in the carriage and another decided to serenade us with his Bluetooth speaker (his music taste was poor). Multiple fare evaders (reflecting London’s wonderful diversity) at the barriers.
When boarding the Underground, we had to listen to this announcement on a loop. ‘Phone theft is common at this station’ every 30 seconds. I’ve never heard the CT/61016 or no smoking announcements that often.
This is what I expect in a third world country (although, in fairness, I’ve travelled to some and even they don’t have to warn people not to have their phones out on public transport).
We are in living in a first world, highly developed country. It should be safe to stand on a platform inside a transport station *in the capital city* of this advanced economy without being barked at to not have your phone out because it’s so unsafe.
Here’s a novel idea: instead of stopping people from having their phones out, how about we robustly deal with phone theft, get BTP onto platforms to rugby tackle the thieves, and lock the scum up for considerable periods as a deterrent to others?
Stop dealing with things downstream and making life miserable for the law-abiding country. Tackle problems at source.
Tourists hearing this shit must think they’ve accidentally ended up in a failed state.
Reminder: the rape gang trial transcripts that went viral in January 2025 were posted in response to Fraser Nelson's tone-deaf Christmas column in the Telegraph, insisting Britain was an "integration miracle".
Nelson knows what Muslims have done to thousands of British children, and yet he lies to run cover for multiculturalism anyway.
One of the most despicable people in public life.
Clueless Policing Minister Sarah Jones completely falls apart under Nick Ferrari’s questioning 🤦♂️
In a painful LBC interview, Sarah Jones was asked a straightforward question about the Hampshire officers who handcuffed dying 18-year-old Henry Nowak as he bled out from multiple stab wounds, after wrongly treating the stabbed student as the aggressor.
Nick Ferrari: “It’s reported the officers involved won’t be referred for misconduct. Why is that?”
Jones immediately stammers and hides behind the IOPC investigation.
Ferrari presses: “As of now they haven’t been referred for misconduct? Are they still serving on frontline duties?”
Again, nothing. Just more IOPC deflection.
Ferrari: “Why can’t you tell me whether they’re still on the frontline? Don’t the people of Southampton have a right to know?”
Jones keeps parroting the same line about the IOPC “looking at footage, talking to officers, talking to the family…”
Ferrari, clearly fed up: “Minister, I asked whether they’re still serving frontline duties. Do you know whether they are or not?”
Jones starts the IOPC script again. Ferrari cuts her off:
“But do you know whether they’re still on the frontline, Minister?!”
Flustered and stuttering, she mumbles something about speaking to the chief constable.
Ferrari: “Have you asked the chief constable? It’s causing concern. You don’t know, do you?”
Then comes the most ridiculous line of all: Jones admits she does know the answer… but she won’t tell the public because “an investigation is ongoing.”
What the actual f*ck?
This has nothing to do with prejudicing an investigation. It’s a basic yes or no: Are these officers still out on the streets policing the public right now? The people of Hampshire and Southampton deserve to know.
This is what we get from this government, a Policing Minister who either doesn’t know what’s happening in her own brief or is too scared to say it. Pathetic.
Bei Henry Novak denke ich unwillkürlich auch an George Floyd u damit an den verstörendsten Lehrerzimmer-Moment während meiner gesamten Dienstzeit. Es war im Juni 2020, kurz vor den Sommerferien: Ich öffne die Tür zum Lehrerzimmer u sehe alle 72 Lehrerkollegen, wie sie still am Boden knien. Für einen drogensüchtigen Verbrecher. Noch heute überkommt mich Fremdscham, wenn ich an diese Szene denke
@babybeginner@EdithHiom Have you found his account yet?
“@bruiser
Great morning.
Training paying off big time, she’s doing really well.
✅ lavish dinners
✅ cuddles
🔒 sofa (needs work, I’m sure she’ll work it out. Seems quite smart for a human)”
Bro, let’s stop pretending.
Muslims make up about 25% of the entire world’s population — over 2 billion people across 50+ countries.
Japanese people? About 1.4% of the world. One single country.
Shinto exists only in Japan.
So when people say “Japan should prioritize minorities and be more accommodating to Islam,” who exactly are we talking about?
The global majority is coming to one of the world’s smallest ethnic and religious groups and demanding that Japan change its culture, food, and traditions for them.
That’s not “protecting minorities.” That’s the majority trying to colonize a tiny minority.
Japan has every right to protect its own people and culture first.
If Muslims want to live under Islamic rules, they already have dozens of countries where they can do that. They don’t need to come to Japan and turn it into another one.
As if I wasn't already entirely pissed off with the police already, I had the most insane interaction with 2 bully-boy coppers this morning.
I dropped home an elderly little old lady, who was taking some time gathering her things and trying to get out of the car. I was on double yellows, but had my hazards on - as I am allowed to do as per the council rules. When a police car came up behind me, and then drove around me to be window level, to tell me that, despite clearly being able to pass me, as he literally was, I was illegally parked and causing an obstruction, and I needed to park on the kerb.
I told him I wasn't parked a) at all, as I was offloading an elderly lady and b) wasn'tstopped illegaly, and I wouldn't be moving on to the kerb because that *would* be illegal as I would then be obstructing the pathway, whereas, I was legally allowed to drop of and pick up, on double yellows. He told me he would arrest me. I told him to try it. He then drove off - proving I wasn't obstructing traffic.
I finished helping the old lady and drove off.
The officers were waiting for me around the corner, put on their lights, pulled me over and demanded to see my licence and insurance before lecturing me about my attitude and demanded I show them some respect.
They could have waited patiently like most people do, or they could have gone around me as they eventually did. Instead they threatened to arrest me for laws I wasn't breaking, simply because they didn't know the law, and then tried to intimidate me afterwards because they realised they were totally wrong about the law, and we're too immature to apologise. They were fully prepared to try and make me loose my job and my lifelong out of nothing but pure spite, ego and vengeance because they made themselves look stupid.
None of that had to happen. Luckily I filmed the entire thing. Utterly disgusting behaviour. This inherent arrogance in the police has to stop.
A man was raped in a park in St Austell last night and they havent put out a description.
If a man is able to over power and rape another man, he will be strong, violent and aggressive. This would have been a long and sustained attack, and I do not believe the victim wasn't able to provide basics like weight, height, skin colour and accent.
A man of this level of aggression and strength is now free in St Austell. Its a dereliction of duty to not out out any sort of description to make every effort to arrest this man as early as possibly before he harms someone else.
@Baroness_Nichol Yes, pretty much everyone is repelled by the behaviour of certain public office holders at the moment.
There’s a great deal of work needed to rebuild trust generally.
This is why I’ve been pushing so hard for a U.S. shield law for foreign censorship. America becoming an impenetrable fortress for free speech will buy us time to fight back in Europe.
@DavidBe31099196 Feels like things are accelerating rapidly now; less time between outrages, less effective containment methods, less establishment competence etc.
Why are political leaders talking as if this is an isolated incident that is being "exploited" by the "far-right" and "pointless rioting" instead of the final fucking straw of anti-white ideology causing the dehumanisation and death of British people?
> The security guard at the Manchester Arena didn't stop the suicide bomber because he was afraid of being called racist. The bomber killed 22 people and injured over 1,000.
> Valdo Calocane was released because authorities feared they would be called "racist" due to the overrepresentation of young black men in mental health detention. He went on to kill 3 people.
> A head teacher who raised concerns about Axel Rudakubana's "very high risk" to others was accused of "racial stereotyping" by authorities. Rudakubana went on to kill 3 young girls and wound 10 others.
> Pakistani Muslim child rape gangs were allowed to operate across Britain, targeting thousands of white and Sikh girls, partly because authorities were afraid of being called racist if they interfered.
Brits have a tremendous capacity to absorb horrors against their own people, but there are only so many times you can order us to "don't look back in anger".
By ignoring people's concerns every time they're expressed democratically and peacefully, the establishment has driven people to engage in direct action. It's dangerous and undemocratic of the government to have done this. And doubly dangerous to give people examples such as Ballymena to follow if people want their concerns to be dealt with.
Tragic scenes last night in Southampton. I condemn that behaviour.
Separately, I have a few points:
- Why are people blaming Farage for people’s rage? Are they really that thick or is it desperation to score political points? People are raging, not because of Farage, but because they have had ENOUGH of what is happening in and to this country.
- Why, when white working class people protest are they consistently met with batons, shields and provocative force? That doesn’t seem to happen as standard elsewhere (Harehills springs to mind)
- Why do the police, given people are already furious with their actions, think it’s a good idea to repeatedly strike a lone individual - who is already prone on the ground - while another officer then moves to try and block the camera view?
Please recall that UK authorities have a dedicated unit called RICU whose sole occupation is intimidating the families of politically-sensitive murder victims to shut up and put out prewritten stuff like this.
You simply cannot trust these sorts of statements.