Stan

founder @runapi23 Helping companies and individuals access united ai api service

[Stan @Stanwxbi]

最近把市面上的 API 平台挨个试了一遍，总结下：

OpenRouter：快是真快，贵也是真贵，国内还老封 IP，统一key统一格式的概念挺好，就是对国内不友好。

ZenMux：概念挺好，但额度黑箱、订阅缩水，实际体验和宣传差距不小。

各类中转站：主要体感就是分组太多，而且有些分组货不对板，比如标的CC纯，其实就是逆向来的。还有就是没有兜底，大多数分组下午就炸，体验感比较差。

所以我在认真研究一个方向：
做一个干净的聚合平台，上游渠道提前筛过，不搞花里胡哨的分组，每个模型几层 fallback 兜底。像个正经的 SLA 服务，但比 OR 便宜一大半。

有同感的朋友吗？

[Stan @Stanwxbi]

说实话cc体感还是强过codex的，但一天成本差10倍，这谁顶得住。跑个龙虾跑个简单任务，codex绰绰有余

[外汇交易员 @fxtrader]

#观察 对中文用户，一边是Anthropic Claude Code的疯狂封号，一边是OpenAI Codex的量大管饱，而二者的水平已经相差无几，你为什么还要用Claude？@AnthropicAI @OpenAI

[Stan @Stanwxbi]

Claude Opus 4.6 和 Sonnet 4.6 的 1M 上下文窗口正式 GA 了，同时取消了之前超过 200K token 的长上下文溢价（输入 2x、输出 1.5x）。

现在全窗口统一标准价：
- Opus 4.6: $5/$25 per MTok
- Sonnet 4.6: $3/$15 per MTok

不需要 beta header，不需要改代码，直接可用。单张请求的媒体上限也从 100 提到了 600 张图片/PDF。

对比 GPT-5.4 超过 272K 仍收 2x，Gemini 3 Pro 超过 200K 也翻倍，Anthropic 是目前唯一全窗口平价的。

[Stan @Stanwxbi]

@LeighMeng 是中转api，https://t.co/g2HvcE1gbo
还蛮靠谱的

[Stan @Stanwxbi]

@Canmi21 200U还是太贵了感觉，我装一个cc-switch，api全用中转的，一个都不到20U

[Stan @Stanwxbi]

@Canmi21 现在中转的codex api跟不要钱一样

[Stan @Stanwxbi]

@xxx111god gpt-5.3-codex会好很多，常规系列agent能力还是不行

[Stan @Stanwxbi]

@jobmeta_intern claude code,because I can plugin api 30% cost
of official price

[Stan @Stanwxbi]

@nivekxft 看来还是codex性价比高

[Stan @Stanwxbi]

好奇大家现在 OpenClaw 里都配的什么 API？
我们目前主推 Claude 的 3折coding 分组，如果 Codex 用的人也多的话我们也安排上，毕竟 Codex API 是越来越便宜了

[Jason Young @Jason_Young1231]

OpenClaw 之所以这么火我觉得有个重要的原因，这几年来开发者是从 chat -> IDE -> agent -> multi agent -> Claude Code / OpenClaw 这么过来的，而圈外人是直接从 chat -> OpenClaw，被震撼也是情理之中，大部分开发者第一次用 Claude Code 的时候也是感到震撼的

[RunAPI @runapi23]

Opus 4.6 surprised me in a 4 model agent build test.

Compared to Gemini 3 Flash and DeepSeek, it streams fast and keeps going without losing structure. Long outputs stay coherent, actionable, and actually implementable.

I’m running these comparisons on https://t.co/ywdDBbWWAK: OpenAI compatible endpoint, up to 70% off, plus $10 free credits on signup.

[RunAPI @runapi23]

Claude Opus 4.6 hasn’t even officially launched yet ,but we’re already preparing the pipeline.

When it drops, three things happen immediately:

• Benchmark it properly. No hype, just numbers.
• Opus 4.5 already runs ~70 tokens/s on our routing , let’s see if 4.6 resets the ceiling.
• And the one that matters most: how much cost can we cut for developers?

Speed is expected.
Cost reduction is intentional.

We’ll handle the optimization.

[RunAPI @runapi23]

Kimi-K2.5 and Qwen3-Max are now live on RunAPI.

Both models are production-ready with high throughput, strong stability, and seamless integration through our unified API.

To celebrate the launch, we are offering a limited-time price at 50% of the official rate.

No migration needed. Switch the model and start building.

[RunAPI @runapi23]

We currently offer three routing modes on RunAPI:

Default gives you access to all vendors at around 50% below typical market pricing. It’s built for everyday use and a strong cost to performance balance.

Plus costs about 1.5× Default, and is tuned for consistently high speed and stability. Best for production workloads and anything latency sensitive.

Auto uses smart routing to send each request to the fastest available upstream in real time. It’s available to paid users who want top performance without having to think about vendor selection.

Pick the mode that matches your workload, and let the platform handle the rest.

[RunAPI @runapi23]

Right now on https://t.co/ywdDBbWoLc
claude 4.5 opus : 42% lower cost
gemini 3 pro preview : 52% lower cost
gpt 5.2 : 55% lower

Same models, same behavior.
Just smarter routing and fewer unnecessary markups.

If you’re shipping with these models every day, the difference shows up on the bill pretty quickly.

[Stan @Stanwxbi]

Quick question for builders here.
Right now RunAPI is simple pay as you go with all models at ~50% price.

I’m considering a $50/month subscription for 10k calls across any model (Claude,Gemini,gpt,kimi…).

Would that actually be useful, or does pay as you go feel safer?
https://t.co/cdsM2ecL2h

[Stan @Stanwxbi]

Honest question building in public what hits harder getting criticized or hearing nothing at all

[Stan @Stanwxbi]

No magic here. We do the boring founder work: find great providers, filter hard, and route every request to whoever is fastest and most reliable right now. You shouldn’t have to overpay for the same model.

[RunAPI @runapi23]

A lot of people still don’t understand what we’re building, or how our API prices can stay at roughly 50% of the “market” rate.

We’re not hosting the models ourselves and reselling them.

For every model on RunAPI, we do the unsexy work: we hunt down multiple strong providers, vet them hard, and only list the ones that can consistently deliver real quality. The goal is simple. Same model behavior you’d expect, but without paying the premium just because one provider is the default.

Then we add the part that actually makes it feel good to use: routing. Every request gets sent to the best provider at that moment, based on real time speed and reliability signals, not just a static rule. If one provider slows down or gets flaky, traffic shifts automatically. You keep the same model, but you’re always hitting the fastest lane.

So the “why” is this: competition plus selection plus routing. We keep multiple providers in the pool, we don’t compromise on performance, and we let the system continuously choose the best option.

You pay half, but you still get the best available provider experience. That’s the whole point.