Still shocked how many people create content with Claude and dont even take a moment to reset the design to get away from the Anthropic serif headlines and background color. Comic Sans used to be the tell about bad "taste" this is the new red flag.
πͺ Grok 4.6 joins the Pantheon of our benchmark, together with Opus/Fable 5 and Kimi K3. πͺ
A good and fast model, and my new daily driver.
Check out the video for more details, an explanation of how our benchmark works, and how you can make your own!
An example of what gets AI past the innovator echo chamber or parlor tricks. Real work happening the way people do their day to day jobs and delivering a real result. No drama, no glitz, just a tangible result.
You can now just forward an email to an agent and get an email back when done.
Here I have GPT 5.6 redline a contract, which it emails me back when done.
Hard to go back from this workflow!
In just a few days working with @Superconductor , features like this Slack app have disrupted my sense of the possible at a foundational level. AI collaboration/review/critique/awareness in real time with the whole team and amazing fidelity a game changes. Multi player FTW
Same app, now officially approved and available in the @SlackHQ Marketplace.
Summon Superconductor from Slack to work on a task, and give your agents the entire thread as context for their work.
https://t.co/Vk9cViGcAx
AI transparency rules are going to be annoying and also directionally correct
The thing is, "was this made by AI?" is now less important than "who reviewed it?"
I don't care if the PR was written by Claude, Codex, Gemini, or a dog
I care who looked at it and what they verified
Every big AI lab is going to have a coding agent
The hard part is not "can the model edit files"
The hard part is:
β’ did it understand the actual team context
β’ can everyone inspect the running app
β’ can we review what happened
β’ do we trust the workflow enough to ship it